▲ 716 ▼ I dunno (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone) submitted 11 months ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/science_memes@mander.xyz locked 705 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 11 months ago (9 children) how should it have been written? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (8 children) Nope, you're right. I just read the words and assumed it was one of the terrible ones. This one is just...math. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (7 children) This one is just…math They ALL are permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (6 children) They're definitely not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (5 children) They’re definitely not Says person who definitely can't give a single example of any that aren't 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (8 children) Nope, you're right. I just read the words and assumed it was one of the terrible ones. This one is just...math. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (7 children) This one is just…math They ALL are permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (6 children) They're definitely not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (5 children) They’re definitely not Says person who definitely can't give a single example of any that aren't 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (7 children) This one is just…math They ALL are permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (6 children) They're definitely not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (5 children) They’re definitely not Says person who definitely can't give a single example of any that aren't 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (6 children) They're definitely not permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (5 children) They’re definitely not Says person who definitely can't give a single example of any that aren't 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (5 children) They’re definitely not Says person who definitely can't give a single example of any that aren't 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (4 children) I don't take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago* (3 children) I don’t take homework from insufferably smug jerks on the Internet Nor Maths teachers apparently, which would explain a lot. Hilarious that you say goodbye when you can't back up what you said with a single example permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Believe what you like. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently. But for your own growth as a person, I recommend you chew on this: the people who write these "questions" to put on Facebook are exploiting the exact same mindset that made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation, and using it to get a massive amount of rage-baity engagement. They're not teachers trying to educate. They're scammers trying to build up a following so that they can execute a scam. Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the "PEMDAS" (or "BEDMAS") acronyms because of the ambiguity inherent in them, and using "GEMS" (or "GEMA") instead. Partially because, if even smart people who know PEMDAS can get confused, the acronym must not be all that useful. Anyway. You're trying to make me mad, and for a minute it worked. But I'm over it. Again--have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (1 child) Believe what you like. Same as all Mathematicians, textbooks and proofs. Including that all mathematics communication and education is flawless and incapable of any ambiguity, apparently Yep made you decide that insulting my intelligence was the best way to have this conversation you were the one who decided to refuse to look in Maths textbooks 🙄 Actual math educators, on the other hand, are moving away from using the “PEMDAS” (or “BEDMAS”) acronyms No they aren't. because of the ambiguity inherent in them There isn't any ambiguity in them 🙄 using “GEMS” (or “GEMA”) instead Nope. No Maths textbooks are using that. the acronym must not be all that useful. And if that is true, then GEMA would be completely useless 🙄 You’re trying to make me mad, No I'm not. Again–have a good one Again, you still couldn't provide a shred of evidence to support your argument permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago Ok. permalink fedilink source parent
