The full text of section 107 says that the federal minister responsible for labour may “do such things as to the Minister seem likely to maintain or secure industrial peace and to promote conditions favourable to the settlement of industrial disputes or differences and to those ends the Minister may refer any question to the Board or direct the Board to do such things as the Minister deems necessary.”

Since June 2024, section 107 has been invoked eight times to interfere with bargaining or end strikes, including those by postal workers, flight attendants and railway workers.

“When big corporations complain, the government caves,” Gazan said while tabling the bill on Monday. “This is a direct violation of workers’ rights, the right to strike and the right to free collective bargaining. These rights were won through generations of struggle and sacrifice, yet government after government violates the rights of workers whenever it is politically convenient.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -28 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Before calling Canada Post's union corrupt, have you ever looked at what their demands are? Because pretty much everything they're asking for is super reasonable, and Canada Post refuses to budge because they know that they're considered an essential service and the government will eventually step in to force a return to work. They've gotten no concessions in last year's strike or since then.

    Never mind the fact that Canada Post is a service by definition and shouldn't be driven by profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "things that are human right" are not the only services the government should provide

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    People should have an option to get official government notices, and other important notices from companies through a service that is not owned by capitalism. Sounds like it isn't for free if everyone is paying for it lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Don't you love it when people just say stuff, like completely made up stuff that is the opposite of how things work in reality

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    So are you one of those people that want no taxes or government? Like, sure, mail delivery isn't a human right, but neither are things we all agree someone should care for, like a transportation network of any kind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Okay, it's just that the argument you wrote out there has implications far beyond the mail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Besides, it would be simple enough to just mandate that 'last-mile' delivery is the exclusive right of Canada Post, which would have the effect of:

    • not letting companies pick and choose the profitable routes while handing off deliveries that are money-losing to CanPost;
    • guaranteeing good wages, benefits, and working conditions for all delivery workers.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nice whataboutism......

    Says nothing about what's actually tabled here.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    First off, Canada Post is a service not a busisnes. Do we expect direct profits from the trans Canada highway?

    Also, bill C58 still isn't the topic at hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Unions have pretty limited purview, so I'm not sure I could ever describe them as "corrupt with power". At worst they become stuck in the old way of doing things, which this seems like an example of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    In practice, very little. People who are in unions tend to be a lot of other things first. Historically unions have endorsed the NDP, but the NDP never got close to actual federal power.

    They can stop work. That's close to the only thing they can do, and they usually don't want to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)