According to videogame patent lawyer Kirk Sigmon, the USPTO granting Nintendo these latest patents isn't just a moment of questionable legal theory. It's an indictment of American patent law.

"Broadly, I don't disagree with the many online complaints about these Nintendo patents," said Sigmon, whose opinions do not represent those of his firm and clients. "They have been an embarrassing failure of the US patent system."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I'm going to patent electrons passing through a xor gate

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can probably get away with it if you write it in a confusing enough fashion; but you need to make it really confusing - to the point even CPU architecture experts could miss it unless they pay very close attention; and remember that the claims - which are the only part of the patent that has any legal meaning - may be limited by law to a single sentence each, but there is no limit on how cumbersome each sentence is; additionally, semicolons are not sentence terminators; this means that this entire comment I just wrote is technically a only one sentence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Prior art exists of that though so you wouldn't be able to. I know you're making a joke though lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If Nintendo can patent MOUNTS in the year of our lord 2025, that lemming can patent logic gates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I thought this was about the ball throwing to capture monsters

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments