you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (24 children)

Watt is not an energy unit.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

    Either way, the numbers in this meme are clearly made up. Most image generation uses fewer than 10 watt hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    People say this, but almost every time the time interval is left off it's hours.

    This is new for me. Must be some engineering thing. I'm a physicist and and I feel guilty if I leave out some units just because, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe it's comparing the total power rating of the brain to a data center dedicated to AI

    Which is also a stupid comparison because the data cenrer will be processing a lot of parallel requests. That's why you want the unit to be energy rather than power in this case

    Or maybe it's all made up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I think it's all made up. The most power hungry data center in the world consumes 150MW of power, and that's from a massive 11 million square foot facility in China that's significantly larger than any other data center.

    EDIT: an hour of heavy thinking does consume approximately 12 watt hours though, so that figure seems reasonable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Its continuous to keep the image active in your mind :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That'd need watt hours though. Meme is only showing the instantaneous power required to conjure the image for an infinitesimal amount of time - you cant do any useful 'work' with it unless the time is accounted for. Watt seconds maybe.

    What makes me skeptikal of this data though is that the correct sciencing term for a billion watts is the well established 'jiggawatt'. In this context I'd have also accepted the Canadian spelling 'jigglewatt'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • Yeah no. Imagine it like a computer and screen. To render an image it will momentarily consume a bit more power, but as soon as it has been rendered it will still continuosily consume a stable amount of x Watt to keep running and displaying the picture. For continuous stable operation of something with no specified time, Watt is the correct unit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    And the text dosnt specify a time interval, whats your point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Also, it literally is an energy unit used in measurements. It's meant as a continious power. Ie. Your active imagination consumes around 12 watts of power, not "rendering one image"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Power is energy per unit of time. Energy is power over a period of time. A lightning strike is about 1 GJ of energy. But it happens in a split second, so the power is far higher, say 100 GW. That is the output of 100 nuclear power plants. But only for 0.01 seconds.

    TNT is even more extreme. It can detonate in microseconds, so release its energy in a fraction of a millisecond. 1 kg contains about 4 MJ of energy, released in about 10 microseconds, a power of about 300 GW. That is about as much power as all of the USA combined needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments