Alright, I read your article. All it says it that there is no study determining a threshold. That's your source?

Meanwhile, here is the ECHA page for ethanol, the alcohol most present in alcoholic beverages and the only one "safe" for consumption. You will there find various toxicity thresholds established by studies, although none on humans. But unless you are willing to argue that humans don't have thresholds for alcohol while mice, rats and monkeys do, that doesn't make a difference to the point.

No need to form a religion, it's just documented science.

Rather than hailing me, you could learn a bit about toxicology. Because the fact that everything has a threshold is pretty basic.

Most outdoor activities are avoidable. Avoiding those activities entirely is safer than wearing protection.

Can you quote the section of my comment that has gotten you so upset please?

I want to know exactly which bit of what I wrote instigated this response, so I know how to reply properly.

I take plenty of vitamin D every day

What deleterious health effects from not getting sun exposure?