you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I mean... it also has to be linear too, but sure okay ☺️

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What has to be linear? Vector?matrix? Tensor? Neither makes sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    You lost me at vectors not having to be linear. You can apply nonlinear functions or operations to vectors, but doing so transforms them into a different, non-linear context, afaik. We might be using different definitions of some of these terms, especially "linear".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    "Linear" describes transformations, not numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Isn't a tensor a multilinear map taking as input a tensor and outputting another tensor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    You just used "tensor" to define "tensor," but also any list of number formulated as an n-dimensional matrix will satisfy this criterion. A tensor is both a linear transformation and an n-dimensional box-shaped list of numbers, but there's nothing such as a linear list of numbers.

  • source
  • parent