[–] [S] 2 points 6 hours ago

It turns out that there might be an elegant way around bloated context windows and slow inference speeds. Instead of stuffing thousands of text tokens into a prompt like standard retrieval setups do, Memorilla approach encodes an entire document collection into just 16 query dependent latent tokens. The system drops these soft memory tokens directly into the input embedding space of a frozen LLM. Doing so averages 394 times fewer document tokens than a full context baseline and 113 times fewer than a standard fifty document retrieval method. Aside from saving massive amounts of compute overhead, the system also beats full context inference on complex multi document reasoning tasks. It hit 84.33 percent accuracy on the FactKG dataset compared to 80.43 percent for full context while using 108 times fewer tokens to represent the source documents.

This approach also has implications for continuous learning and agentic workflows. Having persistent memory prevents the agent from getting stuck in stupid navigation loops between previously explored items. Because the initial document encoding is a one time shared cost, the decoder only processes a small number of memory tokens. You get continuous adaptation to new environments without overwriting prior knowledge or blowing up your active context limit. It's a really clever way to decouple persistent knowledge storage from the active context window.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Before you know it, companies and consumers will have the necessary hardware to handle all their AI needs with edge hardware (e.g. right on their phones and desktops—no need to call out to any servers).

    i saw this too and it made me switch to graphene os because it and it makes me feel conflicted because i believe the anti-AI hysteria will fizzle out the same law the luddites did, but now i'm knee capping my own access wtih graphene. :P

    We could have the equivalent of PhD-level knowledge on zillions of topics built into our PCs and phones and these hardware models wouldn’t need to call out to the cloud at all except to receive patches/updates that get applied whenever they run.

    we've had access to this knowledge for the better part of the last 30 years and it's lead to bigger echo chambers with better propaganda -- the owners of these systems get to decided which pd-level knowledge they want you to have and all this asshattery will continue on as before as a result since it's the same people making the decisions for us right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    Why, because of their slavic names? Or because you get a Lithuanian IBAN?

    The company is headquartered in the UK and both founders have lived there for a long time, even if born elsewhere.

    The IBANs are Lithuanian because that's where it was easier to get registered. Similar to how Wise got registered as a bank in Belgium despite being an UK business with Estonian founders and an office in Tallinn.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Been saying this since 2020: AI is going to follow the same pendulum that beats in the heart of IT since its inception. Some new tech starts out centralized, then slowly shifts to a distributed model. Examples:

    • Mainframes to desktops.
    • Unix servers with (X11) thin clients to desktops.
    • Server-rendered web to client rendered (e.g. SPAs).
    • PBX to soft phones and on-device audio DSP.

    AI is moving even faster. Examples:

    • Apple and Google have already moved inference to their phones to save central compute resources (hybrid approach).
    • Companies are now moving from cloud AI providers to locally hosted options.

    Before you know it, companies and consumers will have the necessary hardware to handle all their AI needs with edge hardware (e.g. right on their phones and desktops—no need to call out to any servers).

    This week's news had researchers demonstrating that ChatGPT Astra could natively modify and improve a tiny Qwen model. How long before we have models that have had all their internal knowledge (fact) checked and embedded into chips via Cerebras Systems method?

    We could have the equivalent of PhD-level knowledge on zillions of topics built into our PCs and phones and these hardware models wouldn't need to call out to the cloud at all except to receive patches/updates that get applied whenever they run.

    They'd get refined and updated over time as flaws are found. People would regularly update these chips in their PCs or buy new phones so they'd have the latest knowledge and capabilities without having to wait for the software patches to do their thing.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I think we need a new phrase for mathematical neurons. It implies we have a greater understanding of actual living brain neurons than we actually do. Obfuscates more than it facilitates.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    NCM models generate an entire answer in parallel rather than sequentially by storing words in collections of layers. At the topmost layer, there is a very rough outline of a concept, which the researchers call codes. In each subsequent layer, the concept gets progressively refined, and only the refinements are stored in that layer as additional codes. So, every subsequent layer has more codes than the preceding one, continuing until the very last layer where every code represents an output token.

    To get an answer for a given prompt, the NCM model is inferenced once per layer with each one representing a parallel prediction of the entire output at a given level of fidelity. As the fidelity progressively increases from layer to layer, the final pass in the bottom layer gives you output text of the highest fidelity as the answer to the prompt. In this way, the model is inferenced the same number of times as the number of layers that the model contains, rather than once per output token.

    The trade-off is that evaluating those codes requires more processing power because there are more codes than there are output tokens at the bottom layer. So, NCM architecture makes a trade reducing the amount of memory bandwidth needed at the cost of more processing power.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    If you follow gaming, you've heard of the AI bubble.

    If you follow music production, you've heard of the AI bubble.

    If you follow the creative arts, you've heard of the AI bubble.

    If you follow technology, you've heard of the AI bubble, even if you drank the blue kool-aid.

    Etc.

    How in the fuck had nobody in the stock market not heard of this before. A cursory search would bring straight to an "explain it like I'm five" level video.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If that post matches your current situation, one OpenAI-compatible endpoint at https://api.getapiomni.com/ covers GLM / DeepSeek / Qwen / Kimi with a single key — top up from $1, real-time balance, card / Apple Pay / Google Pay / PayPal, no region locks. OpenRouter $30-50/mo plus venice $30-50/mo — consolidating the per-token spend on one balance does the same job for less. Happy to share current per-model pricing if useful.

  • source
  • view more: next ›