[–] [S] 2 points 7 hours ago

It turns out that there might be an elegant way around bloated context windows and slow inference speeds. Instead of stuffing thousands of text tokens into a prompt like standard retrieval setups do, Memorilla approach encodes an entire document collection into just 16 query dependent latent tokens. The system drops these soft memory tokens directly into the input embedding space of a frozen LLM. Doing so averages 394 times fewer document tokens than a full context baseline and 113 times fewer than a standard fifty document retrieval method. Aside from saving massive amounts of compute overhead, the system also beats full context inference on complex multi document reasoning tasks. It hit 84.33 percent accuracy on the FactKG dataset compared to 80.43 percent for full context while using 108 times fewer tokens to represent the source documents.

This approach also has implications for continuous learning and agentic workflows. Having persistent memory prevents the agent from getting stuck in stupid navigation loops between previously explored items. Because the initial document encoding is a one time shared cost, the decoder only processes a small number of memory tokens. You get continuous adaptation to new environments without overwriting prior knowledge or blowing up your active context limit. It's a really clever way to decouple persistent knowledge storage from the active context window.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago*

    Any project is a sum of its parts, and if you're talking about maintainability, then the parts you could easily point to would be things like high coupling, overly large file sizes, functions that are too big and should be broken up.

    Meanwhile, your own link shows that it's roughly within the ballpark of industry average. And if you look through issues for any large project on github you'll see similar types of issues. Given how new the project is, none of this is really surprising or out of the ordinary.

    As a note, nowhere did I suggest they do manual code reviews of everything at this speed. What I do think they have is a regression test suite which they build out as issues come up and they fix them.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    I keep hearing people talk about trust, and it's really doesn't make sense to me because we've never done software development based on trust. Humans make mistakes all the time, and I've seen plenty far worse human code than anything an LLM has crapped out over my career. The way we ensure quality is through having a process. It's done by having good specifications, testing, code reviews, planning, and so on. All these things equally apply to code written by hand and that's generated by an LLM, and trust has nothing to do with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    That's only true for the US though. Electricity costs in China are a third of what they are in the states, and open models are now becoming very competitive. We can also see here that DeepSeek is already close to breaking even. The other factor is that models continue to get more efficient, and even local models like Qwen 27b can do serious work. Especially, when combined with good tooling. A coding harness that uses Qwen with five different roles scores as well as Anthropic Fable on the benchmarks.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 14 hours ago

    The Trump administration did not rise, prima facie, like Venus on a half shell from the sea. Donald Trump is the result of a long process of political, cultural and social decay. He is a product of our failed democracy. The longer we perpetuate the fiction that we live in a functioning democracy, that Trump and the political mutations around him are somehow an aberrant deviation that can be vanquished in the next election, the more we will hurtle toward tyranny. The problem is not Trump. It is a political system, dominated by corporate power and the mandarins of the two major political parties, in which we don’t count.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago

    I had plenty of outlets. I would bet money that I did more things and went more places than any kid in the USSR did.

    sure buddy

    I’m still waiting for you to prove I was exploited.

    If you don't understand how child labor is exploitation what else is there to say

    No, tankie. I mean Soviet oppression

    I see I really hit a sore spot there. Always nice to see fash seething.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I just can’t with people like you. If school is mandatory for 18 and under, and those stats exclude students, then the remaining demographic out of the 15 to 24 yr olds are… drum roll… youths from 19 to 24!

    Then it would just say 19-24 wouldn't it genius? The stats obviously track 15-24 year olds across many countries because in many countries child labor is in fact prevalent.

    I don’t think you understand what “part-time” means. It literally means working a job for less than full time, and can even be a single hour per week.

    Nah, I understand what part-time means perfectly. And living in Canada I also know that it's very much not a single hour a week in practice.

    The point of a part-time job for youths is to give them an idea of what actually working is like.

    Weird how I didn't have to be subjected to this in USSR. I love how you're just justifying child labor here pretending like exploiting children is good for them actually. What a clown.

    I worked part-time during highschool, and I had more free time than I knew what to do with.

    Oh you mean your shitty society didn't provide you with any meaningful outlets, so you are thankful for having been exploited as a youth. You have Stockholm syndrome buddy.

    For the record, my parents grew up during the Iron Curtain under Soviet oppression.

    ah yes SoVieT OpPeRession of having guaranteed healthcare, jobs, education, and not having to worry whether you'd be able to retire in dignity. Not to mention kids actually getting to enjoy their childhood rather than being exploited like your dumb ass was.

    Go make a clown of yourself elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Again, as the link I provided explains, youth unemployment counts 15 through 24 year olds. And those stats can't exclude students because school education in China is mandatory, so anybody under 18 is in school by definition.

    It's perfectly normal to get a part time job for kids instead enjoying their youth under barbaric capitalist regimes. Obviously, Canadian teens are doing child labour instead of doing literally anything else. I grew up in USSR, and I didn't have to be exploited in my teens. Amazing how you see this as normal.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Youth unemployment in China is about the same as most of Europe, and much lower than say Sweden or Spain https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/youth_unemployment

    And that's perfectly healthy too because youth unemployment counts people between 15 and 24. So, that just means kids are in school instead of doing child labor, and young people have more options to go to university before joining the workforce. But I'm sure you thought this was some clever gotcha.

    I guess you think that them kids should be put to work as soon as they can walk so they can start making money for the pedo oligarchs am I right?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    I mostly use DeepSeek and Kimi. I find DeepSeek is good enough to do most coding tasks, and Kimi does a good job with planning. And I suspect most people shitting on the ArtCraft apps haven't actually used them. I've been using them for around two weeks now, and if anything, I'm impressed how well they work for being such new apps.

    PhotoCraft is better for me than GIMP and even PhotoGIMP because it's much snappier, the UI/UX is far better because it just apes Photoshop, and the tasks I typically do all work fine. If you're a professional doing complex things with layers and effects, it's obviously not a replacement, but for casual use it's great. And I can only assume it will continue getting better and features will be more fleshed out going forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 9 points 2 days ago (7 children)

    This is going to blow your mind, but use of robotics and automation in manufacturing is already a well established process. Now the idea is just being applied to a wider range of tasks because robots are becoming more versatile.

    Meanwhile, under capitalism, I would imagine employees would starve, but in a socialist system people can just have more free time to enjoy their lives having been freed from drudgery. It's kind of hilarious how everybody in the west was doing concern trolling about aging population in China, and now that China is automating manual labor at scale the concern trolling moved to these mythical unemployed people.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›