The only viable path is ballot measures to amend state constitutions. Any other route is either reversible via the legislature or courts.
Absolutely. He's a compromised, AIPAC stooge. He's not going to lead the Democratic Party anywhere but a holding pattern to await the next loss of congressional majority.
I'm sure minimizing the concerns people have with the Democratic centrists by writing it off as the AIPAC-funded will-endorse-a-republican-if-a-Muslim-is-the-alternative ones just having "had a weird laugh" will totally make them see you as a worthwhile and trustworthy ally!
Even anti-capitalists have to survive in our capitalist hellscape, and if you can get paid to spread the message that capitalism is bad, all the better.

No, just no corporate-owned users-as-a-product site. Millions of people are willing (and already do) host downloaded files from AO3 on their phones and computers. That's redundancy.
My partner is planning to start using the Grimmory (ebook reader) instance I set up on our home network, when AO3 is back up. I suspect this has been a wake up call for a lot of fans that media is not safe in one centralized place.
Server Room != Data Center
sed 's/left/center/'
I mean it's sort of been over for Microsoft for a long time now, though to many non-IT folks it may not be so apparent.
I remember when 90% of web servers were IIS. And MS Exchange was every corporate email server, running on the 90% of servers that were Windows Server. And every laptop was a domain-joined Windows NT Toshiba or Dell.
Now even Microsoft runs their web services on Linux servers. No dev who is not forced to at gunpoint uses a Windows laptop. You'd be hard-pressed to find an SRE or DevOps hire who could confidently explain how to stand up and manage containers on a Windows Server host. And they'd probably walk out of the interview if you even mention Powershell or WMI.
The article is a bit late to the game, because Linux already won.
https://commandlinux.com/statistics/server-os-market-share-windows-vs-linux-vs-bsd/
I think the Expedition 33-style use of parry is more down to people wanting to appeal to the Souls-like demo. It was fine in E33, but it's massively overused.
I think you're thinking too extreme on this; we're not talking Mad Max desert planet survival, we're talking "can afford to buy oranges when they're $30 a dozen", "can afford gas at $20 per gallon". Or even $100. Taylor Swift spends more on aviation gas in a year than most people earn in their entire lifetimes in aggregate. She can afford to keep buying stuff when you or I plain can't anymore.
A lot of people will just break under the financial burden that dwindling supplies driving prices up will impose, waaaay before the supply chains themselves get close to collapsing, because the prices are trending upwards (in part) in order to maintain the supply chain.
The point is that the people rich enough to influence global climate trends aren't going to feel the pressure in their lifetimes (unless they're made to), because they have the money to handle the effects of it.
No one wants to sacrifice their lifestyles, and no one wants to be holding the bag, so they'll pretend it's not happening, and when it comes to their door they'll use their resources to be the last ones it affects.