[–] 1 point 1 week ago

They're not. "They're named Trevors" is a correct but unbelievably clunky sentence no one would actually say. They are both named Trevor. So since there is two of them saying "They're named Trevors" is factually correct. As there are two people named Trevor there. Hence two named Trevors.

I was just being stupid and having fun with the English language. Did get doubly funny when I created Trevi as the plural and then there was some daft point about the plural of Liverpool.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    It's perfectly correct. There are two people named Trevor.

    So the plural is named Trevors.

    Are you trying to suggest the correct plural of named Trevors is Trevi?

    They're named Trevi is completely wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Are you confusing the land mass of England as being part of the European continent with the residents of England as being European?

    Suggest you reread the post title. This is about young Europeans. Which unfortunately young English people aren't anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -23 points 1 month ago* (15 children)

    Ah all those young European English people emigrating to Australia.

    We left. Please exclude us from this sort of European nonsense.

  • source
  •  

    Just thought this after the made of worms post.

    What are the worms full of? Bacteria. Our gut bacteria is vital so are we eating so they can process it for us or are we eating to feed them?

    Lots of these bacteria probably exist without us. We can't exist without them but we do make a very nice house where they can live. So they keep us around.

    Hopefully our bacterial overlords won't rise up against us any time soon.

    view more: next ›