[–] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

I mean, good legislation is good legislation regardless of who signs it, but like you said I don't think he's actually going to do that

May as well pretend to offer a carrot

This will not build political capital, this will spend our political capital for absolutely nothing. Voters do not want us to be bipartisan and compromise right now, they want us to inflict some of the pain that's been inflicted on them into the people who have inflicted it

until it's too late for another Jan6 attempt, there's two full years to use the stick.

Hmm, OK, you might have a point in this very specific scenario. I still maintain that it will be a PR disaster with our voters, and I'm not sure the GOP has another Jan6 in them with how beaten down they seemed this week, but yeah ensuring a peaceful transfer of power is important and might require a different approach than governing will.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

    Literally what election result is this based on? As far as I can tell, "we tried to be nice but failed to get anything done" has lost every single election since like Carter. Like, Trump won general elections because he was an asshole to his opponents and people are that up because it made him seem genuine and like he'd be an effective fighter on behalf of the people who supported him. Promising to be nice to people you are simultaneously arguing (correctly) are corrupt fascists doesn't make you seem reasonable, it make you seem like you're full of shit and just don't believe anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    Oh absolutely not, especially if we take any kind of historical view of how we got here it's a ton of patriarchal rape culture bullshit that demanding we treat abusive monsters with politeness that led to this "bipartisanship over every other concern" idiocy we see all over the Democratic party

    Still, Annie Andrews is shaping up to be a completely perfect example of this crap and it's looking like we should start searching for somebody to primary her now. Call it internalized misogyny or a lack of class consciousness or whatever, but she's perpetuating the crap that's killing this country.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Not just awful men (arc), unfortunately

    KELLY: I saw Nikki Haley, the Republican former governor of your state. She said last night South Carolina didn't vote for you. They voted against Trump Republicans. What do you think? Do you think both can be true?

    ANDREWS: I think we worked really hard to build a campaign that was for everyone. And we brought together people from across the political spectrum. I was so proud to earn the endorsement of former Republican South Carolina Governor David Beasley, also proud to have the support of Ralph Norman's children, including his son, Warren Norman. And we built a campaign that was really laser-focused on the problems South Carolinians face, regardless of if you're a Republican, a Democrat or an independent.

    And that's what the story from last night was - that people are tired of the divisiveness. They're more concerned about what's happening in South Carolina than they are about the party politics in Washington, D.C. And they saw in me someone who will be a fighter for South Carolina, someone who's serious about solving these problems and, again, willing to work across the aisle. The only two senators I've talked to since I won my race last night are Senators Darline Graham and Senator Tim Scott. And Tim Scott and I are planning to get together next week because we're going to work together to solve...

    KELLY: Yeah.

    [Bolding added]

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    If we go down that path we'll get another Trump within 20 years and we may not come back from the next one. Trump is just a symptom, the real disease afflicting this country is the party of Goldwater, Nixon, Reagan, Bush, and countless other traitors. Until that organization is broken every victory we see is just the country getting lucky while playing Russian roulette.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Since Trump’s inauguration, ICE has arrested over 50,000 people in the agency’s Harlingen and San Antonio sectors, called an “Area of Responsibility” (AOR) by the agency, according to arrest data acquired by the Data Deportation Project. Around 20,000 of those people were in ICE’s Harlingen AOR, which covers most of the Rio Grande Valley.

    The people in South Texas have seen this as betrayal, whether by the GOP or by their neighbors who voted for them. This was an affront against the electorate that, for years, local, state, and national GOP factions have looked at as the greatest coalition to get—an untapped bastion of anti-establishment sentiment after years of disinvestment by the Democratic Party. That anger could fit somewhat inside of a playbook of the anti-government screeds from the Republican soapbox, and, briefly, it did work. Because the core of their messages over these last election cycles was simple: Democrats have abandoned you, but you now have a place to go.

    But for an electorate that votes based more on class and industry ties and, sometimes, solely for the personality–a legacy of the region’s boss rule politics and the strength of Blue Dog Democrat figures in the region–it is not so surprising to see what happened in South Texas on Tuesday night. Put another way, South Texans voted against policies that harmed them or their livelihoods, not necessarily for the Democratic Party, which campaigned on alleviating that pain.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261106130826/https://www.texasobserver.org/inundated-by-ice-and-rising-costs-of-living-south-texas-returns-home-to-democrats/

     

    The law, which went into effect on July 1, 2024, does not differentiate between those using and those selling the drug, and it doesn’t require prosecutors to find evidence of trafficking. Instead, prosecutors can charge people with fentanyl trafficking if they possess at least 4 grams or 100 pills that contain fentanyl. InvestigateWest reviewed court records for all fentanyl trafficking charges filed through June 30 of this year. Among the 90 cases that included arrest reports, one-third of them lacked evidence such as scales, ledgers and small bags, which when found together are commonly considered proof that someone sold or intended to sell drugs. But court records show those people were charged with trafficking and face the law’s mandatory minimum prison terms based on the amount of fentanyl police said they had.

    A sheriff deputy in western Idaho’s Nez Perce County arrested a man for drug possession after he dropped a bag of blue pills that the deputy identified as fentanyl on the floor of a casino, according to the police report. After counting 111 pills, “I changed the charge from possession, to trafficking Fentanyl,” the deputy wrote in the report.

    One county north, Isaac Berger was charged with fentanyl trafficking by the Latah County Prosecutor’s Office after an emergency room nurse who was treating him for an overdose reported Berger to police. Less than three months later, Berger died of fentanyl poisoning. The detective who investigated Berger's death said there was no evidence that he was planning to sell or distribute the drugs, which Berger’s mother brought to the hospital in an effort to help healthcare workers save her son.

    Prosecutors who supported the law during legislative debates continue to defend it, saying it deters drug dealers from bringing fentanyl into the state, though none provided evidence to support the claim.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261106130413/https://www.investigatewest.org/an-idaho-law-targeted-fentanyl-dealers-prosecutors-are-using-it-to-charge-users-too/

    [–] [S] 10 points 1 day ago

    In January 2015, Trannyshack was renamed "Mother" and started taking place at Oasis, a San Francisco gay club owned by Heklina. The reason for the name change was out of respect for the transgender community, who were critical of the use of the word "tranny" as being offensive.

    I think there's a generational difference on what words are or are not slurs. Like, at one point I ended up in a conversation with a friend's very chill but 70+ year old parents and they couldn't believe I used the word "queer" to describe somebody because that was a slur to them, but they also thought calling that person "fruity" was totally OK, which definitely made me feel uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Anti-LGBTQ+ Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) followed in the president’s footsteps on Monday when he used an anti-trans slur to describe cisgender Democratic South Carolina Senate candidate Annie Andrews.

    Scott said during an appearance on Real America’s Voice, “Annie Andrews, as President Donald Trump calls her, tr***y Annie, here’s a person who believes, as a pediatrician, for trans surgery, gender surgery for trans kids. That’s wrong. Period,” Scott said.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261105125550/https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/10/stop-embarrassing-our-state-gop-senator-slammed-for-using-slur-to-insult-democrat/

    [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Also, Senate filibuster hasn't gone anywhere yet. Everything gets better the fewer Republicans we have in Washington DC and the American people seem about as eager to get rid of them as I have ever seen them, so we should seize that momentum if we can.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Congressional Progressive Caucus chair Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), appearing with four progressives who won in swing seats in the midterms, called for Democrats to pass populist legislation “every week” in the next term focusing on corporate corruption, lower costs, and higher wages. The Progressive Caucus, which expects to welcome at least 25 new members, and will begin the upcoming 120th Congress with more than 100, is putting down an early marker on how Democrats should conduct themselves, with what is likely to be one of the biggest House majorities since the early 1990s.

    “We have won immense amounts of political power, and now is the most important time to deliver to keep that power,” said Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-FL), a vice chair of the caucus and co-chair of the CPC’s political action committee, which spent millions of dollars in swing seats this year. “The way we’re going to keep Democrats in office is by passing bold pieces of legislation that show you when you vote Democrats in office, your life will get better.”

    Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), a former CPC chair who still co-chairs the PAC, concurred. “We are not popular as a Democratic Party across the country right now,” Jayapal said. “We’ve got a shot to show that we can deliver on the bold populist change people ran on and won on.”

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261105130708/https://prospect.org/2026/11/04/progressive-caucus-wants-to-deliver-on-democratic-promises/

     

    “One of the things that we heard last night, resoundingly across the country, is that we are in ... a new movement in this country,” Flanagan said. “Many of us were elected who refused corporate PAC money, who are beholden only to the people who elected us and are ready to fight for bold change. And so I think it’s time for new leadership.”

    Archived at https://archive.ph/pvOKU

    [–] [S] 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

    Meanwhile, South Carolina's new Democratic Senator one day after the election (arc)

    KELLY: I saw Nikki Haley, the Republican former governor of your state. She said last night South Carolina didn't vote for you. They voted against Trump Republicans. What do you think? Do you think both can be true?

    ANDREWS: I think we worked really hard to build a campaign that was for everyone. And we brought together people from across the political spectrum. I was so proud to earn the endorsement of former Republican South Carolina Governor David Beasley, also proud to have the support of Ralph Norman's children, including his son, Warren Norman. And we built a campaign that was really laser-focused on the problems South Carolinians face, regardless of if you're a Republican, a Democrat or an independent.

    And that's what the story from last night was - that people are tired of the divisiveness. They're more concerned about what's happening in South Carolina than they are about the party politics in Washington, D.C. And they saw in me someone who will be a fighter for South Carolina, someone who's serious about solving these problems and, again, willing to work across the aisle. The only two senators I've talked to since I won my race last night are Senators Darline Graham and Senator Tim Scott. And Tim Scott and I are planning to get together next week because we're going to work together to solve...

    KELLY: Yeah.

    [Bolding added]

  • source
  •  

    Voters on Tuesday preferred the Winchester Model 1873 rifle in early returns as their favorite to become Idaho’s state gun.

    The Model 1873 had received 31.2% of the vote as of 1:10 a.m. Wednesday. The Winchester Model 1894 was next with 25.4%.

    The vote, which was on a nonbinding advisory question, pit six firearms against each other for the possible honorific. The state Legislature would have to take action to make the designation official.

    Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/SzcDE

     

    A measure that would ban transgender athletes from competing in gendered sports, from kindergarten through college, was too close to call Tuesday night.

    At midnight, 52.2% of the votes tallied were in favor of Proposition 134 and 47.8% were opposed. That was with 73% of the votes counted in Colorado. The measure needs 50% of the vote to pass and changes state law, not the state constitution, which means the legislature could rewrite or even eliminate it.

    Proposition 134 would affect transgender athletes playing sports from kindergarten through college at any school or sports association that receives state funding. It requires that students assigned male at birth play only on boys teams or co-ed teams and vice versa for females.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261104131327/https://coloradosun.com/2026/11/04/proposition-134-election-results-transgender-athletes/

     

    An effort to ban transgender girls from girls school sports in Washington was leading in election results released Tuesday night.

    According to the Secretary of State’s office, 54% of voters said yes on Initiative 638, one of three ballot measures backed by conservative political committee Let’s Go Washington. More votes will be counted in the coming days.

    Archived at https://archive.ph/2dosL

     

    Arizona voters appear all but certain excluding trans students from girls sports teams and the school bathrooms and locker rooms that reflect their gender identity.

    Dubbed the “Protect Girls Sports in Arizona Act,” Proposition 318 threatens schools and athletic associations with lawsuits if they allow trans girls to join the sports teams consistent with their gender identity or let someone use a locker room, shower facility or bathroom intended to be for a person of the opposite biological sex. It is already illegal under Arizona law to permit trans girls to play on school sports teams designated for girls, but the initiative would extend that prohibition to private athletic organizations, like Little League.

    Votes for Prop. 318 raced to a likely insurmountable lead of more than 200,000 votes when initial election results were released shortly after 8 p.m. Tuesday. Those votes came from early ballots that were returned prior to Election Day.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261104050210/https://azmirror.com/2026/11/03/arizona-voters-back-prop-318-banning-trans-students-from-bathrooms-matching-their-gender/

     

    This election will determine control of Congress. Rep. Pete Aguilar, who represents California's 33rd Congressional District, shares how Democratic Party leaders are feeling as results come in.

    ...

    CHANG: Well, let me just ask you, Congressman Aguilar, are there serious plans if you retake the House as Democrats to try to impeach President Trump again?

    AGUILAR: No. We are focused on delivering on the affordability agenda. Now, that doesn't mean that we are opposed to accountability and oversight. This administration needs that clearly. They are reckless and irresponsible at just about every level, including the most, you know, corrupt and inept Cabinet ever assembled. But I think we can start there. Keep in mind, it was a Republican who filed articles of impeachment on Pete Hegseth, and Speaker Johnson, who you just talked...

    CHANG: Right.

    AGUILAR: ...Who you just played there, actually sent us home, sent us back to our districts in September to avoid that vote because it was going to be bipartisan.

    CHANG: Well, when it comes to...

    AGUILAR: We believe (ph) strongly in accountability, and that's what we plan to do.

    CHANG: In the last minute and a half we have left - when it comes to oversight and accountability, if Democrats were in charge of the House, do you expect to be investigating the Trump administration, and if so, what will you be looking into first?

    AGUILAR: There will be a host of investigations, and Jamie Raskin with the Judiciary Committee and Robert Garcia with House Oversight will take leadership roles on those issues. And there is plenty to investigate, but I'll tell you what the American public wants us to investigate are the grift and the corruption, the self-dealing, the no-bid contracts, all of those things that are stealing taxpayers' money that otherwise could be going to deliver on the priorities that they care about, you know, delivering on healthcare.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261104125118/https://www.npr.org/2026/11/03/nx-s1-6026666/what-democrats-plan-to-prioritize-if-they-retake-the-house

     

    The US Supreme Court on Tuesday considers a challenge by Catholic groups to a Colorado law barring anti-LGBT discrimination at publicly funded preschools, as conservative religious interests seek to extend their winning streak before the justices.

    ...

    Colorado children in 2023 became ​eligible under state law for 15 hours per week of publicly funded preschool before entering kindergarten. Participating preschools may be public or private, secular or religious. But in each case, under the law, schools must give all children “equal opportunity” to enroll, regardless of the ⁠sexual orientation or gender identity of the students or parents.

    The Archdiocese of Denver ⁠along with other Catholic entities and a Colorado family sued as the state’s universal preschool initiative ​was ramping up. They argued that the program’s anti-discrimination mandate burdened their religious exercise.

    The archdiocese oversees 34 Catholic preschools, according to court papers. ​Its policy is to admit students only from families who support Catholic beliefs, including on same-sex relationships and ‌gender identity.

    Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261103124436/https://wifc.com/2026/11/03/us-supreme-court-to-weigh-catholic-preschools-challenge-to-lgbt-protections/

    view more: next ›