TotK fixed some of those issues, but I'm not sure it would make it enjoyable in your eyes. It follows a similar pattern of getting all the runes in the tutorial area before opening up. Each boss fight now has a longer dungeon that does give more unique abilities (and some that sort of open new areas) but not in the way metroidvanias do. Also weapons last much much much longer in BotW.
My biggest gripe with BG3 was that a major point of praise for it was how polished it was, despite it still being quite buggy and the UI being very annoying very often. Love the voice acting, I think it's good, great even, I just don't think it was God's gift to humanity or that it deserved game if the year.
Also, if every AI company does this, then it's more books gone. If they cooperated they'd only need to do it once. Good scans of all books in the public domain would be so useful for us all as society.
Might be meant to be a horse or something?
I sort of get it because of you know you're only using the model when you have Internet and want it to search then just let it.
I think it's silly that they used the term as a term in a movie like that when it's a trope term, but we have billionaires naming surveillance companies Palantir and the tunneling companies Boring Company. It feels somewhat accurate in that sense. Someone sort of vaguely nerdy, out of touch, and giving something a name that's just way way way too on the nose.
Honestly I thought it was gonna be shaped like a Trojan
"This comment really shows you have a ZeroGravitas complex," They said in reply, their JackbyDev complex showing plain as day.
Almost certainly. They don't want people to be able to have a fun buzz with out consequences the next day legally.
Misread baddie as baddie 💅 and was confused.
Small point of order, there was an option to disable it, but it was extremely hidden and buried in the advanced settings area and called "enabling toxic mode". Also, this only disabled the runtime policy. There was no way for end users to disable the instance list that was in the source code itself.
I don't know what the difference between foo([0-9]+)? and foo[0-9]* is. Is this just an instance of wonky code or is there actually a reason to prefer the first?