[–] 2 points 14 hours ago*

If your food is bland: season it. That's it, that's the solution.

Most recipes either write "season to taste" or leave even that out completely, because it's just such an automatic part for every experienced cook.

I don't know if there's a good guide to seasoning out there, probably.

But apart from that, it's not too hard to build your own knowledge. Just go to the grocery store spice section, and buy a bunch of the generic grocery store brand spices (those will be the spices most used in your region) and just start putting them on your food.

My personal suggestion:

Salt, salt, saaaaalt (/Soy sauce). Put some salt in the water that you cook your noodles with. Put some salt in your sauce. Put some salt over the final mix. Do all this slowly, only a bit of salt at a time, and mix and taste each time. Repeat until it tastes good. It's almost always salt missing if it's too bland. It matters, too, at which point you add the salt, if you put salt into the noodle water, the noodles will already absorb some of it. That's different than putting it on top of the noodles later.

Pepper(/chili). Almost all dishes want some of this, even if you don't like spicy food. Even if you only put a bit on it where the result doesn't register as "spicy", it still makes a lot of difference.

With all the other spices you'll just have to experiment with, see what you like.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    Because most people are overworked and incompetent. In short, yes, they are stupid.

    Most of the time, they're not doing it out of malice.

    When you're dealing with stupid people, you can't expect them to magically be non-stupid. You then have to be smart yourself.

    How far away is the neuropsych evaluation?

    Which country is this?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    Either be scared not to find a better job or scared by skill atrophy. Your choice. But if you find a better job, no need to worry for a while, while the skill atrophy worries will keep being around.

    I personally would choose to put all effort into looking for another job than putting in effort to get better at one I don't like.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (3 children)

    It's pretty much always materially possible. It'll likely severely reduce quality of life in the short term if you're in a bad situation materially, but it's almost always worth it. Obviously everyone has to make that kind of decision for themselves, but I know what I'd choose.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Sure, but what they're gonna do with that is the question. Like even if there is a profile on my Lemmy account, which ads are they going to send me? How? Where is that data going to be worth anything?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago* (5 children)

    You do know that until 2100, there is still very little effect of climate change?

    The actual timescale for most of the effects is in the span of hundreds of years. Because the catastrophic effects are so far in the future is why people do so little about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Basically I'm like 99% sure I'm trans. If I could just magically physically be a woman right now, I would immediately, and probably never present male again.

    However, I look male, I have a beard, broad shoulders, a penis, etc, and I don't really mind either. Transitioning would be annoying and since I lived so long as a man, I'll never pass, and I don't like a "mixed look" at all. And yeah, I really don't mind my body, I find men attractive, I find women attractive, I find myself attractive. I'm fine with what biology decided I should look like.

    Does anyone share this kind of view on themselves? I only have tangential contact with any trans communities, and I never really see this sentiment represented.

     

    I started out by having only Windows, and what I did was simply shrink the windows partitions and add some ext4 at the end for Arch.

    Now I want to get rid of all Windows and go Linux-only, and was wondering what would be the best setup for my use-case, which is mostly gaming, some programming.

    I have these disks:

    • one very fast m.2 1TB SSD that I want my current most-played games on
    • one slower SATA 1TB SSD that I would be fine with games I play less or whose loading times I don't care that much about
    • one newer 4TB HDD for all my music, photos, documents, torrents and shit
    • one old 1TB HDD for idk whatever

    The root volume is on the m.2 SSD and is LUKS encrypted. Would love for everything to be encrypted.

    The rest are all just separate mount points, and I either manually or use Steam's storage features to move games around.

    Since I'm still mostly a Linux noob, I was just wondering what more experienced Lemmy people would think to be best.

    I was thinking about some LVM setup (though I haven't looked at yet how that works) that via lvmcache automatically uses the faster drives for the most used data, but I'm not sure how well that works compared to just moving the games I care about to the fast SSD, because as far as I see it works by caching the most-used stuff, but I want a new game I install to be immediately fast, not some time later after it was determined that it's "most-used".

    view more: next ›