no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
45 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 62 points 4 months ago (6 children)

If only there existed some coordinated organization on a national level that could create laws to ensure the safety of pedestrians.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    There does, and it does, but that doesn't really seem to be the point of the story to me. This is very much a "loud exhausts correlate to dark triad personality traits" kind of story. Or perhaps more like how everyone knows they participate in actual atrocity and torture against vulnerable individuals but just keep buying their corpses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    You do realise the government can just ban cars above a certain size anytime they want right? Like I can't buy a tank and drive it down the road, or a car that is wider than the size of a lane. All they have to do is adjust the limits to weed out the dangerous and inefficient models. Sometimes talking apes are far too stupid to allow their non-existent critical thought to self-regulate their actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    With how popular huge SUVs seem to be, that would be a very unpopular measure. Then you also have the car manufacturer lobbies squeezing your balls if you try to pass something like that.

    I'd like a middle ground where these cars have much higher insurance premiums and are heavily taxed in proportion to their space usage.

    Want to drive around in a car that weighs 3x my city car, then you need to pay 3x as more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Road damage caused by a vehicle is proportional to the fourth power of vehicle weight. That leaves out other externalities such as deaths and injuries caused to pedestrians, cyclists and people in other motor vehicles.

    But taxes should reflect externalities, so a bit part of vehicle tax should also rise as the fourth power of vehicle weight. Double the weight, sixteen times the tax. I'd make enforcement simpler by setting a zero-rate mimimum of 1000 kg.

    By the way, use of this formula also illustrates the imbecility of those demanding a tax on bicycles. If the base rate is, let's say, £100 per annum for an unladen 1-tonne vehicle, then that for a bike weighing 20kg would be £100/100**4. That is, 1/10,000 of a pound, or 1/100 of a penny. And other bicycle-caused externalities aren't much different in proportion to those caused by a motor vehicle.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago

    Cunts who purchase cunt cars don't care about others. More at 11.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The implication is that the buyer is a bad driver, which most people would think is someone else since they are actually a good driver. The Dunning-Kruger effect applies here.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (19 children)

    How is the financial penalty of them costing a shitload more to buy and run not enough, why do people want these?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Around 2020, manufacturers all but stopped making small cars since it's easier for them to make SUVs and trucks with weaker emissions standards. It's almost impossible to find any compact that was made after 2020, especially in the US. I'm sure it's only a bonus that they're typically more expensive than small cars.

    There's also the problem that the more SUVs and trucks dominate the streets, the more dangerous they become for everyone. Your average car weighs as much as a damn elephant nowadays. I own a compact but hate driving because it's like being in the middle of a drunken stampede.

    At the end of the day, fuck cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    I think a lot of people don't want them. But in my case there wasn't any normal car that had the features I wanted. I'd rather not need it but I really do if I'm gonna be able to work full time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    What features did you need that couldn't be offered in a sedan or small hatchback?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Any who lives in snowy conditions could want the additional ground clearance or weight for traction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Unnecessary; roads get salted or cleared by public organisations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Never lived in northern new england i take it? Maybe in your neck of the woods they get plowed early and often. In some parts of the country you won't get to work until noon if you wait for the plows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I wanted a car that was relatively quiet and a plug in hybrid. Not a big list of demands by far.

    But so many of the PHEVs are SUVs nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Why do you want a plug in hybrid? Haven’t they been shown to be useless for the climate?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Because the vast majority of my traveling can be done using electricity and not gasoline.

    It is way cheaper to charge it and I frankly like to drive it more, when it is using electricity. Sometimes I do longer trips and need to use gasoline and I do not have the option of charging it at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    SUV driver: "That is a sacrifice I am willing to make"

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago*

    The risk to pedestrians is a bonus to the average motorist.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Wait did someone think people buy cars with others in mind? (Noting that "impressing" others is for the self, not the others)

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    "Some of you may die. Shame it's not more."

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    A lot of people who are attracted to these so so through fear.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    When the market fails, regulation is needed.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago
    [–] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Why are all the studies nowadays doing nothing more than confirming common sense that almost everyone else can see?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments