all 76 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Well I for one think that dogs SHOULD have the right to vote.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    But is the dog republican?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 5 months ago (53 children)

    Fuck Gavin Newsom’s traitorous ass. Trans rights are human rights.

  • source
  • hideshow 53 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    i dont see how hes involved with election, hes not running anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -55 points 5 months ago (49 children)
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (17 children)

    Being able to access my medicine is absolutely at the forefront of my mind, thanks for letting me know I'm not helping.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    How does that help anyone but yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Sorry, what the fuck are you doing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Your part is throwing everyone else to the wolves until you are fighting alone? If you can't fight with us at least don't fight against us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Trans people are people, bud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    So "minorkeys not having access to things" is death but state violence to others is not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Now that we are at strawmen void of those pesky human emotions like "that person just needs to pee while out in public" and "maybe sacrificing an entire group of people because minorkeys can't walk and chew bubblegum is bad" we can get to the robot pragmatism. If you genuinely care about safety of workers, fair wages, decent working conditions and checks on corporate power workers unions are at worst the best stopgap. Trans people have had an outsized impact on unionization campaigns in recent history. If you say that we need to throw trans people under the bus to focus on the very issue they, broad brush as a group, excel at fixing I assume you are arguing in bad faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    "How does chemotherapy help anyone but the cancer patient?"

    That's what you sound like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    It doesn't have to, you fucking nitwit. Chemotherapy is for the benefit of the cancer patient.

    And guess what? Everyone benefits from living in a society where everyone is able to access the medical care that they need.

    Only someone truly insane, out-of-touch, malicious, misanthropic, cynical, selfish, and short-sighted would ever ask a question like "But how do I or anyone else benefit from you receiving medical treatment?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Wow you're so progressive for asking trans people to martyr themselves for the greater good /s. Would you call the LGBT community selfish for rejecting a Democrat who was willing to sacrifice gay marriage too or is this a unique view on trans rights for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    Not at all. Just reprioritize to focus on the fires that threaten everything, including trans acceptance and support. Anyone who focuses on lesser, personal threats, is themselves, a hazard to everyone else, and to themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    My most urgent issue is human rights. Ipso facto trans rights. If you think you can Munich Conference your way into "helping" fight the modern Nazis, you are the one who should reassess the value you are adding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Perhaps it should be the increasing reduction in resource access and the loss of the tangible value of labour within the market economy monopoly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    "I don't give a single damn about racial equality!" Yells the white Pullman employee. Division and dilution is how we dug this hole. Stop digging.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    good luck fighting those monopolies by your onsie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Pray tell, what is more urgent than respect for your fellow human beings right to exist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Food. Water. Shelter. Air. Freedom from bondage. Lots of shit is. Wtf are you talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Those are not mutually exclusive to trans rights. There’s actually considerable overlap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If rights are shared with non-trans, they aren't trans rights, they're just human rights

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    But if you decide trans people don’t qualify as human, their rights don’t matter anymore. If that becomes acceptable, all anyone has to do to deny you of your own human rights is to decide you are some lesser life form without legal protections.

    We help eachother swim or every damn one of us drowns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Existential threats kind of supercede anything else honestly. Just because the Republicans happen to be doing absolutely everything evil and destructive possible across the board, that doesn't mean any of the individual issues are less severe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Not getting a specific trans right isn't an existential threat and it is relatively less severe than the emergence of a technofacist surveillance state and the re-enslavement of humanity, imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -19 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Transwomen are women, and I will not have my womanhood robbed from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    ted cruz is the lightning rod for the gop senate, his terrible for the gop, but they need him in the senate because they have slim margin and cant afford to lose even 1 senator the dems, him and lindsey are reliable votes.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    ¡Ay! Rafaelito. How proud your mamacita must be.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    C'mon Ted. Show us your cool boots. That's your only legacy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    His name is Raphael, not Ted.

  • source