The rich will be fine. It is the rest of us who will be fucked.
post
Why couldn’t we spend it on better quality of life? It would have real-world benefits.
we spend
It's not our money. CEOs deserve it for working so hard. They are 10x productive. They work 80 hours a day when your lazy ass only do 8 hours.
... and 9 other hilarious jokes to share with family at the dinner table
They’re allegedly that productive because delegation, and I too would be delegating if I too were in their same position so they haven’t done much more than deliberate. And if I were in their position, I would do the same shit.
I also deliberate and delegate as much as I can so fuck ‘em.
And most of that “delegation” is already baked in by hierarchical work environments so again, fuck’em.
How does that help the owners of the western world continue to make exponential money, exactly?
The Goal at the very top is to wholly, or as much as they can, eliminate the lower classes and all they deem lesser and live in, ironically, fully automated luxury space communism. AI, theoretically, is a path to letting them do just that.
If AI doesn't work out their goal remains the same, and it's not improving your life if you turn out to be an essential 'lesser.'
AI doesn’t need to “work” in the sense that it does people’s jobs well. It just needs to work as an excuse to fire people and work as competition in the labour market. That way even if they can’t completely replace their workforce, they can at least pay them far less bc instead of paying an expert, they’re paying someone (with expert qualifications) minimum wage to be an “ai overseer.” Unless we elect leftist politicians that will actually pass worker protection laws then this will continue to happen and get worse and worse
It is like they watched all of the dystopian sci-fi from the last 40 years and decided "we should totally do that"
The companies involved in building out AI infrastructure, committed as they are to spending vast sums on capital expenditure, now face a not-too-dissimilar situation to the railroad companies of the early 1870s. In particular But in the last six months two things have changed dramatically over the last twelve months.
Wtf is this? Please tell me this article wasn't written by AI
I don't fucking know (probably)
I went to Walmart the other day, first time in years. AI art on everything. Went to several stores where AI music was playing on the radio. Searching on the internet feels like trudging through slop. My work colleagues send me AI photos and articles. I'm constantly getting AI slop pull requests.
I can't fucking take it anymore, it's like the whole planet got infected with slop.
I dunno, seems like an honest editing mistake that is actually more likely to be human than AI generated. Probably should read "In particular in the last six months, but two things have changed dramatically over the last twelve months."
With the "But" capitalized it looks like an editing or copy error.
The fear is that, if the past is anything to go by, the AI boom will follow a similar arc to these other technology-driven infrastructure booms: a flood of speculative capital will flow in, leading to massive overinvestment, asset price bubbles and ultimately a crash as euphoria collides with a disappointing reality.
Shocking.
I'm only shocked that the "euphoria" hasn't collided with the disappointing reality yet. At least not catastrophically.
It seems the more abstracted the financial systems are, the more the finance industry can bullshit its way through. And at this point, money is just whatever numbers they type into their computers. Just completely made up and detached from reality.
OpenAI and Anthropic's IPOs +2-4 weeks is my best guess for when the market starts sliding. Investor money is already drying up, but too many rich people haven't cashed out yet, helping themselves (like SpaceX) to our index retirement funds to countersign withdrawals at the inflated valuations.
I'm on the fence after that if it'll happen slow or fast. Possible we'll get a Bear Stearns/Lehman type failure that brings down the world's markets, after a major player no longer has a blank check at multi-billion/quarter burn rates, and hits insolvency like a freight train. But also likely it could unravel more slowly like a sweater, as de-escalating levels of market access pull on the thread in turn.
Great, that means were gonna fight mecha hitler in the 2040s
Better load up Wolfenstein 3D again. We're ready for this.
Is it possible that their attempt to be listed on the index is a way for private capital to cash in on their investments, leaving 401k funds etc holding the bag when the value dips?
There are numerous articles and analyses online exactly to this effect. It is absolutely the goal.
I mean the money was just sitting there in those 401ks they'd be foolish not to figure out some way to rob it for themselves
1929...2029...uh....help?
Just wait for the collapse and buy when the prices are low. As the markets recover the poor will get poorer and the rich will get richer. What is there to be worried about?
The reality that the rich will be bailed out with public funds, perpetrators and benefactors will receive no just consequences, and the economic hardship will destroy prosperity for multiple future middle class generations with unattainable retirement and runaway inflation.
So the usual stuff.
Oh, come on. This is nothing like the Great Depression.
The Great Depression was caused by a supply side spending boom, producing massive excess of capacity, while nobody had any money to spend on anything.
...
Nothing like it, I tell you!
What's mindfuckingly frustrating is that EVERYONE (but the rich ass financial types) see it coming. And there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WE CAN DO to prevent or prepare for it.
We met with my mother's broker a few weeks ago (company rhymes with "Laymond Maims"). My brother expressed his concern about the AI bubble and the broker basically said CEOs are smart people who are legally bound to safeguard their companies and they wouldn't be so heavily invested in AI if there was any chance of its being a bubble.
Just one of the most dumbassed arguments I've ever heard. OK, then how did all the other bubbles in history happen? But it was equally dumbassed of my brother to expect a broker to say anything else. I'll bet he gets a fucking daily memo telling him not to let anybody de-AI their portfolios -- if that's even possible at this point.
Alas, mom is all "they've done such a great job over the years increasing the value of our portfolio". Bitch, the fucking market went through the roof, that's why your portfolio has done so well. It has nothing to do with Draymond Claims. You were in mutual funds the whole time!
No, I don't actually call my mom a bitch.
I would immediately change brokers. That's a level of uneducated and propagandized that is truly dangerous.
The last few financial crises have led to massive wealth transfers to the 1%. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the more accelerationist of them are trying to engineer them at this point.
They will keep the scam going until an IPO. Then cash out and let the rest of us fucked
Save your pennies then you can buy up all the property of the impoverished at a deflated rate and rent it back to them at any price you want.
And there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WE CAN DO to prevent or prepare for it.
sure there is.
- get a years supply of shelf stable food, preferably things with a decade long shelf life
- start a garden and fill it with staple foods that are nutritional and abundant
- install a solar system, no matter how big or small
- collect barter goods like alcohol, fabric, paper, hand tools, entertainment media, books, etc
- learn trade skills that can land you a job in a jobless market
these are just five things you can do now before the bust.
- install a solar system, no matter how big or small
Gee, get a load'a this one, goin round whackin heliocentric planetary systems in people's yards. Kickin off the gravitational alignment of Earth with their extra "sun and planets" next to the lavender.
I hear they even do dual-star solar systems.. pffft... thats just showing off.
In particular But in the last six months two things have changed dramatically over the last twelve months.
Has this article been written by AI? I've seen a number of weird sentences in this article but this one... Wut?
In topic: yeah, AI will fuck humanity in all the ways we never expected. There won't be terminators, we'll just have broken economies, extreme unemployment, no water, huge pollution, and all for a tool that is confidently wrong half the time and dumps people into psychosis.
Awesome
It seems more like a bad editor/insufficient proofreading.
That's the kind of comment I sometimes make if I rephrase it in the draft, but don't check to make sure I remove all of the original sentence before posting.
If anything, this makes it more likely it wasn't written by AI. These are typical mistakes people make when they're overthinking their writing, while writing.
It's a pity that your Pulitzer Prize level writing didn't enable you to craft something more literate than a two sentence clickbait title for your article.
Judging by the downvotes, I think my comment might have been misinterpreted. I was addressing the writer of the Fortune article in absentia, not criticizing the poster of the article on Lemmy.
No, people just think your petty response to the headline, in the absence of any meaningful response to the article, doesn't contribute anything to the conversation.
Fair enough. I'll live with my downvotes, but it is a pet peeve. In the spirit of making a more tangible contribution, albeit still an off-topic one, I'll leave this slightly satirical Mc Sweeney's article here, which addresses this scourge: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/two-sentence-headlines-are-everywhere-heres-why-you-should-be-concerned
I do believe that having issues with the current format of media is, in itself, a trope that is as old as time.
Criticism of confirming to the norm is a bit lazy. Certainly in this case. It could've been the editor that forced him to the format.
Or do you find fault with him putting house Pulitzer prize forward in the title? Because if so, ironically inferring from your posted article, he should've used a three sentence title :p.
you couldn't have addressed the writer, when you were referring to the person with the pulitzer
The Great Depression was caused by a mismanagement of the money supply on the Gold Standard. It has nothing in relation with the AI boom and potential bust. Typical financial fearmongering of breadlines, global collapse, and forever depression.
Oh the thing going pop but unfortunately we are going pay for this. The rich going be bailed out.
Only bright side is that hopefully the crash will allow us to riot. Because we going need a bloody revolution to overturn this fascist take over.
Don't worry, 401ks buffer the US economy now which is why you usually can only pick from a small set of crappy funds. They are what prevented a major depression the last couple of major recessions. Poor people lose their retirement to keep rich people afloat as always.

all 24 comments