all 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 112 points 5 months ago (1 child)

I think it was the black guy more than the tan suit that they took exception to.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 80 points 5 months ago

    Oh, and EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Obama was not just a black president, but a well-spoken, intelligent, knowledgeable black president who navigated the US out of the subprime mortgage crisis and won a second term despite all efforts by the GOP to wreck his chances.

    Granted, he still abused the disposition matrix, failed at his promise of executive transparency, ratcheted up surveillance of Americans to eleven and stuck to neoliberal policies which still pulled wealth up from the working class to the ownership class, but the conservatives and Republicans had no complaint about any of this. These grievances came from the left.

    But how dare he be a black man, and far more competent than Bush!? (Curiously, he got a Nobel Peace Prize just for not being Bush. Even Obama was surprised and admitted he hoped to earn it during his tenure.)

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Obama was a good and competent president who happened to be black. Being black had nothing to do with how well he did his job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yes. That's the point. But it did have just a little bit to do with why Republicans viciously attacked him and still do...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    There were not serious about it. They were paid to say this bullshit. They all new it's stupid but the base was dumb enough to buy it.

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    At best they were "serious" about it

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    But it was definitely flung around every where like he had ritually sacrificed a human being on the chamber floor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah let's leave it up and use it for advertising. Nothing says sophistication more than an ad of Goya Beans in front of your house.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Idiocracy was a cautionary tale not a how-to guide.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    President Comacho also did it better. He actually swallowed his pride and found the best man to solve the issue of his day. The current guy? He’ll parade around like he solved it because that’s all he’s got … plastic. No wonder “Mar-a-lago infection” has manifested in women contorting their face with “a herpes.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah and those several times Obama shit his pants on camera. Oh, right, that's President Dump.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 26 points 5 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    I really just can't take people who support this seriously anymore. Either admit you got conned or you're a big ol jerk who's profiting from the destruction of America, which one? You haven't "owned the libs" or anything, you just made yourselves look like the biggest dupes ever.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    I’m tired, boss.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    Right, but this is what plants crave.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Most of them weren't serious about it. They spent 8 years bitching that extra amount because the President was black.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    Not people

    Paid pundits who's sole job it was to keep the US population distracted over dumb shit while real shit was happening

    This has been a thing in the US for what, decades, now? It's pretty much the sole reasons for Fox News existence, to distract people with bullshit so that the billionaire thugs can rob the coffers dry

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    He's literally only saying this as a distraction. From the Epstein files and now Iran (which was originally a small distraction from the Epstein files).

    THAT'S CRAZY! WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Shit at least he didnt express a preference for Dijon mustard. Because that would be clfucked up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    No. US media was talking about it as they pushed narrative. Americans, who live and die by their social and news media feeds, then started copying that, as usual.

    They don't think for themselves, they just follow their feeds and timelines. If their feed stops talking about Epstein, so do they. If their feed starts talking about Iran, so do they. Literally that's all that happened with the tan suit and why the ballroom is nothing.

    Hell, scroll through Lemmy's 'Hot' and 'New' feeds while the US is active if you need to see it in action.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    This... This is a link aggregator website. It exists to link to external sources and discuss them. I'm sorry did you think this was Original Thoughts dot com?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    No, This is politicalmemes and a comment section anywhere is for expression and discussion, but especially more common for memes. Kinda the whole point of the culture of it existing.

    What I do think is you've given an excellent example of irony... dot com; or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    You literally specify about Lemmy's Hot and New feeds, why would you try to bluff about only talking "memes"?

    It's ok to be wrong some times. Bit embarrassing though to, 2 comments lower, claim you meant something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    The point was never about a specific feed. It was about people following whatever their algorithm or curation drops into it, rather than thinking independently.

    I don't know what you're on about, but that's the argument. One that wasn't even at you.

    So if you want to challenge that, great. But pulling apart the wording and ignoring the substance ain't engaging in the idea.

    It's ok to be wrong some times.

    Look, honestly, that sounds like either projection or a line that's worked on you before. It's normal that everyone's wrong a lot of the time and I think most people know that of themselves and others. I have no idea why you'd profound that out of no where unless you've made it a "who's right; who's wrong" interaction in your head somehiw. And if it is, peace out! Fuck that shit lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Lmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • source