top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 5 months ago (6 children)

You'll never convince me that Elon didn't rig the election.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago

    He literally paid people to vote for trump. In the open.

    Nobody needs to be convinced of that. That is a fact. What you need to do is convince the people in power that that should be a punishable offense. But he put the people on power on power, so why would they punish him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    He definitely influenced it. Like, massively. But directly, hands on....? Yeah maybe lol

    Seriously, though, i wish we knew. On character judgement and history and intent and everything? Yes 100% absolutely. But have evidence? Hard to investigate with Nazis running almost all of the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    But directly, hands on…? Yeah maybe lol

    They'll never know

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Is that a puppet? Why does his face look like a race horse's ass? Do you think billionaire blood tastes different? Why is his torso so big? Why don't his eyes look alive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    A Project 2029 cannot be a collection of Democratic Party agenda items. It must articulate a broad new conception of the nation’s political order — one that will guide the way a future Democratic-led government might wield power. Above all, Democrats must have a plan for reconstruction — for building something new on the wreckage of what President Trump, MAGA and the Republican Party have wrought — not restoration of what was.

    The whole article puts eloquent prose to the thoughts in my head (looking from outside the US) as to what the USA needs to recover post-Trump; it's more than striving to going back to normal.

    The issue is that centrist Democratic voices have been kind of developing their vision by committee over any aims to make it cohesive and comprehensive. In my view the plan has to recognize and tackle these three things:

    • Internal complacency within the Democratic party to do good things for people rather than just talk about them
    • Reforming the outdated systems that simply relied on trust that the system wouldn't corrupt itself or overlook corruption.
    • Fixing the destruction caused by the Trump administration, then taking steps to prevent a cult like Congress and a bought-and-paid-for judiciary to surrender the republic to the executive.

    The important thing is you can't grandfather in the corruption while you fix it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    The important thing is you can't grandfather in the corruption while you fix it.

    100% this (from an Americanist's perspective). Just think of slavery and how it was enshrined in the constitution despite being on the way out. You had to have a whole-ass civil war, shooting and all, to fix it. And arguably still didn't, cf. the pervasiveness of Confederate nostalgia and the prison industrial complex.

    The same forces that successfully lobbied to keep slavery going are lobbying to keep systemic corruption going. Telling you at every opportunity in all the media outlets they bought that it's the American way, baby!

    The only solution to this mess is to finally redefine who "We the People" actually are. If it's still going to be a bunch of rich white dudes with an aversion to taxes, woe betide you.

    Of course that raises the question who would have the authority to perform this redefinition and how they would gain it. Barring a bona fide revolution, I just don't see it at this point.

    Thoughts and prayers from Europe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    He also writes

    They need, in particular, a commitment to a constitutional order centered on the power and prerogatives of Congress

    which yeah, that makes a lot of sense to me as a European – but as I understand it, congress is not a very popular institution in the US. I've been following the aggregators for Trump's favorability/approval ratings - and while they're not very high, they are a lot higher than the ones for congress. This is going to be tough to do.

    Still possible, but I think it depends on the "good things" you mentioned being very clearly good and noticeable in peoples' lives.

    Also, nice to read a comment from someone who actually read the article

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 5 months ago (20 children)

    Gosh.. Who enabled this I wonder. What major informers of voters was a key proponent of 'actually Trump is probably a better choice than Biden'.

    Fuck.. if only we had the capability to search the past for answers.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    What % of NYT readers voted for Trump? It has to be minuscule.

    The election was so close, there are dozens of but-for causes that could have tipped the scale, but the NYT not being sufficiently alarmist about Trump (which is what that CNN article you linked claims - not that the paper was a proponent of Trump, as you say) probably wasn’t one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    Democrat turnout was pretty abysmal, and the media sanewashing of trump certainly contributed to some of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Running a candidate who nobody voted for in a primary probably contributed to it as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    yeah. Not being a member of political party is terrifying to many people. Joining the republicans is an impossibility to many people, so they hold their nose and join the Dems, who couldnt give two shites what the voters want. As we saw in that election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    WELL I FUCKING VOTED FOR HER. She was right there on the ticket, under Biden. I have enough of a brain to realize if Biden couldn't run anymore she would naturally be the candidate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    What's natural about that? If the incumbent can't run again what would be natural is another primary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    No the VICE President would be the next person in line for the job. Who else better prepared to be the president than the person who spent 4 years studying the position in case they had to step in to do the job?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    You're saying this better serves the Democratic voters than running a legitimate primary election?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Well in an ideal world he would have stepped down in 2022 and let her be President for 2 years. She would have been reelected then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Sounds like we agree Biden fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It’s really shitty that the Democrats have to appeal to leftist, liberals, independents, Democrats and everything in between with the platform and messaging, Republicans have to appeal to their base, that’s it. Makes it really hard to win elections when you have to be the perfect candidate for 10 different groups of people all with different ideologies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    They don't have to be perfect, just not alienating to 80% of their potential supporters. They didn't appeal to anyone but supposed "centrists" that are actually right-wing and would never vote D, and their real constituancy of wealthy backers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    I agree there must have been a sizable chunk of voters who were unaware that Trump posed a threat to democracy itself, but I assume those people are just generally relatively uninformed. The way I knew he was a threat to democracy was through consuming mainstream media (and some podcasts).

    By 2024 Trump had been on the political scene for almost a decade. This was post Jan 6. There was no excuse for putting him back in power. The voters sanewashed him to themselves. People are very adaptable. We are the same species who owned slaves, walked on the moon, tore out peoples hearts at the tops of pyramids, sit in boxes for 8 hours a day, and hunted giant fuzzy elephants to extinction by hand - and all of it is “normal.”

    Even today, 37% of Americans think Trump is great!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I see so the voters are the problem, you're saying?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes.

    Well, a problem. Because I don’t see the world in black and white and believe there is just one problem, unlike some idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    thats good to hear, because in your last comment you were just harping on the one thing-- the voters, so you sounded like an "idiot" (your choice of word not mine) for a second but sounds like you didnt get your whole viewpoint out. Have a nice day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    The media coverage leading up to the election was infuriating. If that's how the masses get their information, then it absolutely does skew the outcome of elections.

    Maybe NYT was just one slice of the cake, but add up all the other major media outlets that were sanewashing trump and skirting over his many glaring issues, while piling on Biden and later Kamala and nitpicking them with the finest-toothed of combs, and the problem becomes obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 55 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    America didn't give Trump a second chance. That implies he was caught and convicted, and punished for something he did wrong.

    He did not spend a single day in jail. His sentence in New York was effectively commuted.

    He was never even charged at the federal level.

    He was allowed to continue his tyranny.

    Because Democrats refused to actually hold him to account.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    We broke it giving him a first chance.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    You realize he lost the first election, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    How does that change anything? He still won the election.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Trump is a symptom of a problem that’s been brewing since the heritage foundation formed in the 1970s.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago

    No, when the American Civil War was ended without ending all of the enemy leadership. Giving clemency to traitors who are fundamentally evil, was and is a foolish thing to do.

    If there is a 2nd American Civil War, it is a lesson worth remembering.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    My will to live (edit: In the US).

    They broke my will to live (edit: In the US).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    You need to recast that. They broke your will to live in the U.S.. There are still some nice places in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    America was broken before this. Giving Trump a second chance (or a first) was a symptom.

  • source
  • [+] 36 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago

    The US put a gun to its head in 2016. In 2024, it pulled the trigger.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I think it's pulling the bandaid off. The US was already on its way to being the capitalist beast it is. Getting eyes on this is great and gives the chance for other countries to get more leverage.

    And the folks that weren't planning on waking up got their call.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Broke ain't the right word. Revealed could be used, or accelerated.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago*

    Simple people love simple answers.

    It's a lot easier to blame trump personally and pretend we'd have been fine without him. Even tho most of the people saying Trump's the only problem, said the same thing about Bush.

    It's easier to blame the sacrifice goat (especially when the goat is evil) than it is to understand if that goat was never born the same people would have just brought out a different goat.

    Republican and neoliberal presidents are always just empty suits for the oligarchs.

    But simple people never pay enough attention, they don't look past the surface. They'll never understand how to fix the underlying condition, because they only notice symptoms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    The USA has been falling apart since 1975 and voting for MAGA, not once, but twice is accelerating the process.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    (Nick cage "you don't say" meme)

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    For 10 years every media outlet on the country has had to repeatedly show his face and play his voice throughout every single day of broadcast and publication. I'm tired bro, I'm so tired. I can't live in a world where every screen in the country is his face constantly staring at me. So I turned it off. I'm not ignoring what's going on in the world, but everywhere that normalized him lost me. NY Times, NPR, all of it. What broke in this country is I'm not the customer anymore of our traditional media system. And when he attacks those institutions, what am I supposed to do about it? Cry? You made your bed.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm for second chances.....when the stakes are lower. A waiter messes up a few people's orders, you give him a chance to improve. A president of a country steals classified documents and attempts a violent coup to stay in power, you ban from ever being in a position of power again

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    Naw. America stopped pretending when it reelected Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    The total lack of selfawareness is staggering.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    A broken country elected a broken leader.

    America was already broken, that’s why trump got elected. Everything from education to financial security is an ongoing disaster. Then trump & co. destroyed the rest.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Second chance!? Trump blew past second chance in grade school. Now he is on his 16,546 chance.

    Edit: Alternative title

    The ruling class broke America when they forced Trump on the American people the first time. This time around they are shitting on the ground and then rubbing citizens noses in it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    The 2024 election was stolen after their 2029 efforts failed. Simple as that.

  • source
  • [+] -14 points 5 months ago (26 children)

    Joe Biden broke America when America rallied around him as the only other option and his first action in office was to tell his voters if they thought he'd do anything they don't know how politics worked....

    That crashed 2028 turnout and is why trump was elected the second time.

    We already had the negative consequences, we have to understand why it actually happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (16 children)

    Biden's inaction, and his appointing Merrick Garland who also did far too little far too late, are only two of many events in a long chain that built up to this.

    Before Biden there was the failure to do anything about Obama's war crimes, the failure to do anything about GWB's numerous war crimes and lies that started two wars, the failure to do anything about Reagan and the Iran-Contra scheme or the rigging of HUD, the failure to actually prosecute Nixon... all the way back to failing to prosecute the confederates that murdered 1.5 million people. Jefferson Davis was never even prosecuted, and was released from jail after two years without a trial.

    The US is broken because it has never held powerful people responsible for their crimes. The revolution to escape a king only established an oligarchy of the wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    It's almost like the political system incentivizes and relies on its presidents committing mass atrocities in order to exist!

    This is why the Democrats will never save us. The Democrats need these wars, and war crimes, and corruption, and over policing, and the most authoritarian criminal justice system on the planet, and the military spying on citizens, and international drug running, and black market arms selling, and genocide, and millions of deaths by depravation. They need just as much as the Republicans need them.

    And that's because the US government, like all liberal governments (which is most of the world's governments), are actually systems for managing the interests and conflicts of the powerful. The masses are powerful, the billionaires/merchants are powerful, the military is powerful. There are factions within all of these power centers and the government's function is to prevent civil war at any scale to prevent the destruction of capital assets and to create the conditions for the success of these factions.

    The masses aren't in power. So the government's function relative to the masses is to prevent them from revolting and keep them laboring for profit and filling the ranks of the military

    The military's primary function after ensuring no domestic revolt is to destroy the capital of competitors in other countries and to prevent coalition building against the enemies of the American billionaires and, because kf historical relationships, the Western European billionaires.

    The billionaires are the ones that fight amongst themselves the most. The tech faction, the industrial faction, the finance faction - these faction has different theories about how to remain in power and wealth. And the problem is that the entire world system that made them powerful and rich is waning. The ecosystem is under immense pressure. Many nations have established effective resistance against both US military power and US financial power, and more are developing them and forming coalitions. The Chinese outmaneuvered the American billionaires and created a situation where destroying Chinese capital results in the destruction of America and European wealth and the ability of the government to keep the masses docile with cheap commodities.

    The whole American system, and by historical process, the whole European system, is facing down a fundamental shift in global economics that threatens to completely undo their entire power structure. They don't give a flying fuck about abortions or trans people or voting rights or whatever wedge issue they pick next. They are doing that to manage the masses, keep them scared, keep them fighting amongst themselves, and keep them collaborating with the "good cop" faction (the Democrats). They have never cared to hold their leaders accountable for crimes because they all fundamentally agree with the motivation and outcomes of those crimes. They are scrambling to figure out how to keep their gravy train running and they do not have an answer. They need to take drastic actions and they don't know if they'll work, so they need lightning rod presidents to absorb all the negativity and so they can perform "resistance" to maintain the allegiance of those they oppress.

    The Rs are the bad cop and the Ds are the good cop. You do not work with the good cop just because they perform higher moral positioning or because they soothe your anxieties about or claim to be protecting you from the bad cop. They are collaborators. They are working for the same department, they have the same goals, they just need you to participate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    Trump stalled the trials until he became president. That is why Merrick Garland had the same success as everyone else that has tried to hold Trump accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    Biden took office Jan 20th, 2021. Garland didn't appoint Jack Smith until November 18th, 2022 - one year and almost ten full months later. Almost halfway through Biden's term. What Trump did on January 6th was obvious and well known before Biden took office, the fact that Jack Smith wasn't appointed IN EARLY 2021 is a colossal failure on Biden's part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    The January 6th insurrection involved tens of thousands of people that had to be interviewed, interrogated and investigated. It involved people from across the country and mountains of evidence to be processed. Everything from social media posts to surveillance footage. To top it all off there was no room for error because Trump has always used corruption to escape consequence.

    Trump loyalist that were involved did everything they could to help Trump by slowing the process.

    When you attack someone for trying to hold Trump accountable you discourage others from trying to hold Trump accountable.

    Trump is old as fuck and a lifelong criminal pedophile felon rapist that has never been held accountable and that has nothing to do with Biden or Merrick Garland or Obama.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, there was a lot of work to do. Which is why waiting almost two years to start working is so fucking appalling. They should have started in early 2021!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    It took that long because Merrick did things by the book. Because any other way would increase Trump’s chances of winning.

    In the end the timing didn’t matter because U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon permanently blocked the Department of Justice from publicly releasing Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final investigative report regarding Donald Trump’s retention of classified documents.

    Starting earlier would not change that outcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    In the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attack, the government captured and held hundreds of men without due process, which it justified as exigent circumstances. In the aftermath of the nation's democratic institutions being attacked, which was an exigent circumstance if I've ever seen one, it did nothing. There were thousands of people involved, and lots of evidence to collect, but we knew who the ringleaders were. They should have been in Gitmo by the end of the day on January 21st, 2021.

    But, as the OC said, this country never holds the powerful accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    In the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attack the court of public opinion was in agreement that it was justified as exigent circumstances. No Americans were defending the terrorist.

    In the aftermath of the nation’s democratic institutions being attacked, it was a large portion of the voting populous that was actively contributing, primarily due to psyop campaigns from Russia and the Trump administration that convinced a large amount of the populous that the election was stolen. The people that were victims of this campaign were judges, politicians, military leaders and many other roles that allowed them to do things like Judge Cannon when she dismissed the 40-count federal indictment against Donald Trump and two aides, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.

    The difference between these two scenarios are so obvious they shouldn’t need explaining.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Not ar all. The GOP were angry, or left in stunned silence for weeks; it was fascinating at the time to watch them re-frame the narrative in public, in real time. In the first days, though, I doubt they would've objected. And so what if they did? Biden was the President, how would they stop him? If there had been a MAGA uprising, it could have been crushed, just like Occupy Wall Street was.

    Also, plenty of people objected to the flouting of due process in 2002. The difference is not that some people objected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (4 children)

    MAGA is made up of people with systemic power like judges, cops, military leaders, the billionaire class.

    The occupy Wall Street movement never had members with that much power. Or anywhere near the same numbers.

    The majority of Americans were ok with the reactions to 2001 terrorist attacks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    That was the point, wasn't it? That the U.S. has never held the powerful to account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    The point was that in the example of the terrorist attacks that there wasn’t anyone to hold accountable because as far as the majority was concerned there was nothing to be held accountable for.

    With the example of Jan 6th U.S. tried to hold Trump accountable but was prevented by Trump himself with the help of a majority of the voting populous.

    In a democracy it’s the voters that decide if there is something to be held accountable for. In both examples the voters decided there was nothing to be held accountable for.

    In addition to that there are plenty examples of the U.S. holding the powerful to account. Here’s what I found in just a few seconds:

    • George Santos: The former New York Republican Congressman was arrested and indicted on a 13-count federal indictment in May 2023 for charges including wire fraud, money laundering, theft of public funds, and making false statements.

    • Chris Collins: The New York Representative was indicted and arrested in 2018 for tipping off his son to confidential corporate information regarding an Australian biotechnology company. He resigned and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and lying to law enforcement.

    • Duncan Hunter: The California Representative was indicted in 2018 and eventually pleaded guilty to misusing over \(\$150,000\) in campaign funds for personal expenses, including family vacations, movie tickets, and extramarital affairs.

    • Larry Householder: The former Ohio Speaker of the House was arrested and convicted in March 2023 in a \(\$60\) million federal racketeering and bribery scheme—one of the largest public corruption cases in state history.

    • Steve Watkins: The former Kansas Republican congressional candidate and Representative was charged with three felony counts and one misdemeanor regarding voter fraud and illegally registering his residence at a UPS store ahead of the 2019 election.

    • David Rivera: The former Florida Representative was arrested in Atlanta in December 2022 and indicted for federal charges including acting as an unregistered foreign agent for a Venezuelan national and conspiracy to launder money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Okay, so we do hold people in positions of power accountable, so Biden should have locked up the coup leaders on day one. As we have unfortunately seen, the President can act despite objections from the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Biden locking up the coup leaders on day one without the support of voters would be the move of a dictator and would require Biden to pull off a coup first because the president otherwise doesn’t have the ability to do what you are suggesting.

    Trump is only able to get away with his crimes because of the support he has from voters, billionares, Russia, the GOP and all the corrupt judges and Judicial roles he has filled with loyalist (just to name a few examples).

    Biden never had that kind of support.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Merrick Garland who also did far too little far too late, are only two of many events in a long chain that built up to this.

    More people didn't vote than voted for Kamala or trump...

    The problem is voter turnout, because people thought even if Kamala won, Dem.votersbwouldmt.

    It ain't that complicated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (6 children)

    Yeah, you heard them. Everything trump does is Bidens fault. Don't blame the people that voted for him, or the entire party continuing to enable him and not holding him accountable. Obviously this is entirely on Biden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Democrats lay the foundations for the actions committed by Republicans, fascism didn't happen in vacuum, it required the assistance if a perceived weak liberal party. Liberal voters refusing to hold their own people accountable led to where we are right now. You've told them they can do anything they want, including a genocide, and you will still come back for more. Your lesser evil, which doesn't exist, allowed for a larger acceptable evil the next time, compounded over 50 years you've allowed the evil to grow so large someone like trump became possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    'lesser evil, which doesn't exist' 'larger [...] evil'

    Compelling argument contradicting yourself in the same sentence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    It's not a contradiction, you believe a lesser evil exists, your lesser evil grows at an ever expanding pace. At one time Democrats thought Dan Quayle misspelling potato was an outrage, now you turn a blind eye to genocide. See how that works, how it continually grows?

    Lesser evil does not exist, only evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's not what he said. The turnout for Biden was lesser because his "nothing will fundamentally change" message was for the donor class and the literal opposite of what people needed to hear. Then Kamala was finally "allowed" to take over the campaign and when asked she essentially said "everything Biden did was great, I wouldn't and won't do anything different." which was also the literal opposite of what people needed to hear. It's what the monied class needed to hear though, but although their money can break a candidate they can't force people to vote or be excited so the turnout wasn't enough to beat the trump cult of personality.

    Everything Trump did was Trump's fault, but Bidens inaction and Kamalas intent to keep doing "nothing" doomed their campaign. Of course add to the mix "Israel is perfect and doesn't ever do anything wrong, we're never going to confront them" didn't help either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Except my entire point stands for trumps first term when he regularly broke the law and failed to be held accountable. Long before Biden was relevant again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    That's fine, but that's not what you said so that's not what I was responding to. You were responding to a comment questioning what givesomefucks said. Now you're saying it's about Trump's first term, but that's not what the original comment was about.

    Edit: I think I was the one misreading the original comment

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    1 comment in c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz view that post