Americans speaking out against artificial intelligence data centers on social media are falling under police surveillance, a confidential law enforcement bulletin obtained by The Intercept reveals.

A fusion center in Philadelphia combed through spicy internet comments from AI critics and concluded there is a growing risk of physical violence against data centers from “domestic violent extremists,” ranging from white supremacists to anarchists.

“Domestic violent extremists (DVEs) are likely interested in targeting artificial intelligence (AI) data centers, posing a physical and cyber threat to infrastructure in the Philadelphia regional area,” the Delaware Valley Intelligence Center wrote in a December alert.

The fusion center distributed its warning, marked “for official use only,” through the national fusion center network of state, local, and federal police agencies.

Like many of the reports produced by fusion centers, the bulletin points to news reports and social media posts, but cites little in the way of tangible threats. It acknowledges “a lack of specific information on plans to target AI data centers in the Philadelphia area,” but warns law enforcement that three planned data center facilities in the region could become targets of future protests.

Some of the anti-AI posts included in the document reflect hyperbolic anti-AI rhetoric that is widespread across social media, including an unnamed internet user who “indicated a desire to ‘burn down’ data centers.” Other examples of potentially terroristic posts included references to a fictional anti-robot movement in the science fiction novel “Dune” and a Facebook meme.

The fusion center, housed inside the Philadelphia Police Department, warned that “disruptive First Amendment activity” is an “indicator” of risk from “Domestic Violent Extremists,” an expansive term favored by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.

[

Related

The Defund Police Movement Takes Aim at Fusion Centers and Mass Surveillance](https://theintercept.com/2021/04/21/maine-defund-police-fusion-centers-mass-surveillance/)

Fusion centers, which sprouted up across the country after the September 11, 2001, attacks, have long been criticized for doing little to thwart actual terror plots and too much to subject lawful protesters to suspicion and surveillance. They have previously warned local cops about the supposed threat from Black Lives Matter protesters and Keystone XL to Line 3 pipeline opponents.

Pennsylvania has its own history of counterterror agencies targeting advocacy groups. In 2010, then-Gov. Ed Rendell apologized for the state Department of Homeland Security contracting with a private firm to produce fearmongering reports on groups including anti-fracking activists.

When it came to the recent data center activist report, longtime Philadelphia civil rights lawyer Paul Hetznecker said he was troubled by the fusion center’s association of AI skeptics with terrorists.

“Those are legitimate, popular political concerns that are raised by local communities.”

“Those are legitimate, popular political concerns that are raised by local communities,” Hetznecker said. “This particular report from [the Delaware Valley Intelligence Center] reflects a very dangerous attempt to characterize that protected First Amendment activity — activity which is fundamental to our democracy — as something other, something more dangerous, a breeding ground for something more sinister.”

The Delaware Valley Intelligence Center did not respond to a request for comment.

The Intercept obtained the Philadelphia report as part of a larger cache of such documents from local fusion centers. It adds to growing evidence that counterterror officials are putting data center skeptics under a microscope. Last week, Wired magazine reported on other notices from local intelligence agencies warning about “anti-tech extremism.” Journalists Ken Klippenstein and Dan Boguslaw also reported on a document from the U.S. Capitol Police Intelligence Services Bureau warning of the potential for anti-data center violence.

The reports are tied to a genuine upswell in popular pushback against data centers. The opposition extends well beyond the mishmash of far-right and far-left groups identified in the Philadelphia fusion center’s report. Seven out of 10 Americans oppose having data centers as neighbors, a recent Gallup poll found.

An image from the Philly Anti-Capitalist blog included in the December bulletin from the Delaware Valley Intelligence Center.  Source: Delaware Valley Intelligence Center

The fusion center report frames the outcry as a potential first step toward violence, telling local police with jurisdiction over the roughly 16 data centers near Philadelphia that they should be aware of angry online posts.

The report warns about posts on an “anti-capitalist blog that remains popular amongst local anarchist extremist collectives.”

Under a title urging “Butlerian Jihad Against AI” — a reference to a book in the Dune science-fantasy series about humans revolting against their intelligent computer overlords — a post on the Philly Anti-Capitalist blog said “only we can decide to smash the screens that are brainwashing us into submission. The time is now, the day is here, ATTACK! ATTACK! ATTACK!”

The post was unattributed, did not include targets for attack, and included a cartoonish sketch of an old-fashioned computer struck by arrows. Nevertheless, local intelligence analysts appeared to take the threat seriously.

A meme included in a December bulletin from the Delaware Valley Intelligence Center warning about social media posts critical of data centers. Source: Delaware Valley Intelligence Center

The bulletin also ticked off other signs of anti-data center furor. There was a meme post on shared on a local Facebook account with text reading: “I cannot escape the feeling that I am morally obligated to sabotage AI data center infrastructure.” Commenters on the post had discussed a proposed Amazon data center near Berwick, Pennsylvania, as a “potential target,” according to the report. The Intercept was able to find other versions of this meme posted to Facebook and Instagram unrelated to the targeting of specific, physical data centers.

The fusion center bulletin also said that white supremacists and members of the dark online subculture dubbed “nihilistic violent extremism” by the FBI had agitated online against data centers.

The document also mentioned a DHS report highlighting a thread on an online image board where users discussed using magnets, explosives, or even — in an idea that reflected a sci-fi movie trope — an electromagnetic pulse weapon to take out data centers.

[

Related

Data Centers Are Military Targets Now](https://theintercept.com/2026/03/20/ai-data-centers-military-targets-iran-war/)

The fusion center analysts appeared to take seriously other rhetoric proposing dramatic attacks. “In addition to general anti-AI data center rhetoric, online users have recently discussed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) for carrying out attacks varying from simple swatting and hoax threats to property damage, arson, and even the use of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) material,” the report said.

“That appears to be an effort by law enforcement to hype up the threat where there may be no threat at all.”

Hetznecker, the civil rights lawyer, said the idea of a nuclear threat raised concerns for him about the quality of the fusion center’s sources and its conclusions.

“That appears to be an effort by law enforcement to hype up the threat where there may be no threat at all,” he said. “To increase scrutiny on First Amendment activities by lumping in those activities with the most extreme, possible scenarios one could imagine that have no factual basis.”

The Philadelphia fusion center report specifically warned authorities of the likelihood that new local data centers could be the traget of protest.

“There is potential for significant pushback to the three newly proposed AI data centers in the Philadelphia area. Indicators of an increased threat in the short term may consist of more disruptive First Amendment activity in opposition to AI data centers, small acts of vandalism, online calls for action to boycott and or protest local AI data centers in the Philadelphia area, and extensive criticism of higher utility bills resulting from AI data centers,” the report said.

The mention of boycotts, criticism, and other activities protected by the First Amendment raised red flags for Hetznecker.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if we see heightened law enforcement scrutiny on legitimate expressions of AI data center concerns, and I hope that would not chill the appropriate dialogue that needs to occur on the impact of data centers on local communities,” he said.

The post Cops Are Spying on People Who Criticize AI Data Centers Online appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
20 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 46 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

Anyone else notice a trend of cops spending way too much time on Social Media instead of going after actual criminals?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I'd love to see cops admit that they're tracking corrupt politicians and CEOs, but that will never happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago

    Cops just doing their job, protecting capital. Same as it ever was.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Philly Cops Admit That They’re Tracking “First Amendment Activity” Critical of AI


    Philly Cops Admit That They’re Tracking Citizens Critical Of A New Unethically Developed Technology Used Against The Same Citizens.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I gotta wonder how much attention they pay to federated social media. Police have always had a mandate to serve the interests of property owners first, so it might be they’ll choose to pretend sources existing free of corporate patronage don’t exist.

    It’s like talking to a Windows guy about Linux. They pretend it’s not what serious companies use, so all the cool OSS stuff is invisible to them. Ask me about how I taught an entire tech consultancy about Markdown files. They thought a good README was saved as a Word doc. Dumbasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I assume they are watching. As such, I consider it jarring when people comment things that are of a threatening nature. I assume that many of these are bait (e.g. "fedposting").

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It’s probably some bait, but I think the majority is nearly legitimate. People post a lot of stupid shit on the Internet. Look at all the morons who post threats and pics/vids of criminal behavior on Facebook, under their own name.

    I also can’t fathom the amount of data they have to sort through. There’s real people in the places they say they are, the fake accounts claiming to be in one nation but are across the world, bot farms, and the weaponized accounts of foreign countries trying to stir shit up abroad. I think this is part of the drive behind AI, law enforcement, as big and powerful as it is, genuinely can’t police the internet and quickly identify legitimate threats to its power. I’m sure they’ve made some advancements, they do have a robust surveillance state, but they can’t use it to the capacity they want. So in the meantime they hype the boogeyman but instead of a monster in your closet it’s a bunch of rats pretending they’re scarier than they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This is why I’m bullish that federated, encrypted, cellular trust networks are going to be such a critical tool. Discussing revolution on a monolithic service is easy pickings. Not so much when the service supporting the movement is simultaneously everywhere and nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The communication arms race will never end and if the worst comes to fruition, the simplest, closest methods will be key. It’s wonderful we can now network and chat with people on the opposite side of the planet, but when shit hits the fan that doesn’t mean much for most of us. I’ve been glad to see zines and slaps make a comeback. Best of luck trying to get your AI to figure out who’s dropping manifestos they punched out on a typewriter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Ah, the literal thinkpol. Very cool, very nice

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    To Protect and Serve [government and corporations]

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    What even the fuck.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    "tracking" things they will do nothing about at least keeps the violent deadbeat cops off the street. I suggest they start counting the number of vowels in Nancy Drew and Hardy boys books, that would be another good use of their time and keep them busy. Whats that saying, "Idle cop hands do the devils work" I think.

    They could also dig holes in fields and then fill them in. Or work on justice degrees at the local community colleges so they could learn to do their jobs professionally.

    Whichever of their idiot supervisors told them to spy on Americans should of course be fired and prosecuted.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Your tax payer dollars at work!!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    AI is not even entrenched in our society and it already gets full protection. We have to allow it and no regulations allowed without the federal government saber rattling.

    This is beyond ridiculous. This has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the corporatocracy ruling our lives.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 10 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Is there anything they don't track...?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    gonna be two types of people: those that steal from the robots and those that kill those who try

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The CIA is useless, can we not all agree on that yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    How very free

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 31 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Wow. Criticism is now called “first amendment activity” and considered a sinister precursor to crime

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Your post seems to imply that this is some sort of conspiracy by local politicians but that's probably disinformation itself:

    From the article:

    A fusion center in Philadelphia combed through spicy Internet comments from AI critics and concluded there is a growing risk of physical violence against data centers from "domestic violent extremists", ranging from white supremacists to anarchists.

    From Wikipedia:

    In the United States, fusion centers are designed to promote information sharing at the federal level between agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Department of Justice, and state, local, and tribal law enforcement.

    It is much more likely that the federal government had an algorithm flag these comments and sent them to Philly law enforcement for review.

  • source