She doesn't even need to be pregnant, you just have to claim to believe she was about to commit an abortion. Free women murders for everyone!
post
"Pro life"
It's only pro life as long as the child is being carried.
Once the kids out, they don't give a fuck about the woman or her child. They could both die, and they'd have no issue with it.
they don't actually care about the child, or its mother, before it's born, either. if they did, our health care system wouldn't be a for-profit scam.
And they wouldn't be letting people use deadly force on pregnant women.
A lot of the lobbying money for anti healthcare stuff comes from woowoo supplement companies etc. Imo we should be regulating the shit out of those companies at every level of government. Ban advertising for the products to prevent false claims, etc.
Lemme get this right...
If you see someone trying to kill a woman while claiming she's trying to get an abortion, you can kill this attacker without issue under the legal classification of acting to protect two people, including a soon-born. Is this what Republicans want? To facilitate the legal argument to kill right-wingers? Because I'd be totally fine with that.
By similar logic, couldn't one kill the legislators who passed this bill? They are clearly inviting violence upon pregnant women, so it should theoretically be legal to kill them in defense of those women if this bill passes.
you'd be legally right but the cops will still squeal up in their full military gear and shoot you all the same. Although to be fair they were probably going to do that anyway.
You can shoot someone who is threatening the life of another person anyway.
Wouldn't the use of deadly force to prevent the abortion actually aid the abortion?
Look, if they thought things through they wouldn’t be Republicans.
I mean Republicans are stupid and all but I think they're intending for this to be a deterrent. It's a stupid and cruel deterrent, but it's probably not meant to somehow kill the woman without killing the baby.
it might not be meant for that, but it will be used to excuse that
essentially through the entire pregnancy people will get to be terrified as all it'd take to legally murder them would be making them look like they wanted an abortion
Doesn’t using deadly force on a pregnant woman defeat the purpose entirely?
Not if you're using deadly force against a doctor willing to perform an abortion, which is the more likely intent of the law.
Or the driver taking her somewhere. Or the person who called the driver.
And so on.
Depends on what you think the true purpose of a law like this would be.
There is no purpose besides cruelty. Whatever the shittiest interpretaion is, that's what the republicans are gonna want to go with.
From a practical standpoint how does one prevent the death of an unborn child via the use of deadly force against its mother?
I think its more about legalizing shooting doctors. What a healthy country we live in.
So is this just another one of those cases where Texas or one of the other mad Max worshipping chaos states, is trying to implement its law nationally.
Why stop there? They can't work if their equipment and ward isn't clean... kill the cleaners!
It's a law legalizing the murder of Planned Parenthood staff and Democrats who want to overturn the law.
That shows just how much they genuinely care for the life of the fetus. If the woman wants/needs to abort then it's wrong. But if the woman wants/needs to abort then both lives are now forfeit
The purpose of their anti-abortion policies has always been to control women. They're finally comfortable dropping the pretext of caring about babies.
Is this just a way to shoot your pregnant mistress for free?
Only if she's trying to get an abortion
What's she going to do? Testify she wasn't?
Only if you leave her brain dead. You kill the baby as well and it's first degree murder
It's basically an excuse to shoot any woman, anytime, so long as you can conceive of a way to claim that you thought she was seeking an abortion. It would be a prosecutorial nightmare, at best, and open season on women at worst.
No, because that will terminate the pregnancy too. But since people are stupid, that's how they will read it (as the upvotes prove).
It's about shooting the doctor performing it and arresting women wanting it.
"Republicans hate women"
I think even republicans know that republicans hate women at this point
Republicans hate everything. They're a brainless death cult only outclassed by Christians as a whole.
As long as you say “he’s abortioning right at me!” you can kill em and ain’t nothing Johnny Law can do about it
On the flip side, it says that a person can use force, including deadly force, to prevent death or harm to themselves or another person.
So hypothetically, your doctor, is using lethal force, to prevent the person inside you from harming you.
Totally legal as the law is written.
IANAL ; best option is to move out of regressive states, and set the place on fire before you leave.
the law is a tool wielded against the working class by the ruling class, it will never protect you from them
to defeat fascism, you must organize. running away and random acts of violence accomplish nothing.
it is coming for you, wherever you run to.
join the IWW and get involved in local activist groups
Fortunately, the thing says it's a bill, and not that it's been passed into law.
If a state does pass a law like that, it's hard to see why any sane woman would want to remain in that state.
it’s hard to see why any sane woman would want to remain in that state
Plenty of people don't want to stay in a place they are oppressed, but the thing about being oppressed is that it often also makes it hard to leave that place.
Bills like these get passed quietly and in darkness. I agree with your sentiment, but it's on us to build the uproar that prevents it from making it any further.
It doesn't sound like Hate, it sounds like Slavery.
Hate would be activelly going out and trying to kill women, whilst punishing them for not letting their bodies be used by others as objects is, IMHO, much more a Slaver's take on other human beings.
A Slaver's motivation would also be pretty in tune with Tradition for Republican members of the power elites in North Carolina.
Removing the remnants of a miscarriage is also coded as an abortion. So theres still plenty of hate in this bill as well.
Hopefully they won't pass a law requiring shotgun weddings in the case of pregnancy.
You've also got to remember that most of these people have never had a proper relationship with a woman in their lives, so they wouldn't know about any of this.
Abortions are actually very common due to miscarriages. I was personally affected by this and was present for a 9 month old abortion of a stillbirth. Even though my wife gave birth it was classified as an abortion because the baby had passed. We even have a abortion certificate.
So, according to proposed law a gunman could enter the hospital and kill the doctors, nurses, my wife and me in order to stop an abortion of a dead baby.
Makes perfect sense.
It's a different and more complicated kind of hate. I find it useful to split bigotry into bigotry to dominate and bigotry to exterminate. American racism towards black people is the former, while American racism towards indigenous people is the latter.
Misogyny is almost always about domination, but it's a unique kind because they can't switch to extermination or even bluff it. They can't hide women away to exist quietly in the background. They're fully dependent on women to reproduce, and for most misogynistic men, for sexual pleasure. Many of them resent that they're dependent on those they see as inferior for such things and that they can be leveraged.
So yeah, this is hate, just a hate that they can deny because they don't want to think that they hate women, just women's independence.
Well, I suppose the broader point I'm making is that it's Sociopathy/Psychopathy.
The most harm done to people (I would even say, the most Evil) comes from people who couldn't care less for how other people feel because they have no Empathy with other people's suffering, and thus when they can will do whatever to others for their own personal upsides, even if those "upsides" are only satisfying their own personal petty psychological desires such as those you point out.
Hate actually involves some element of thinking of and caring about the other person (though a negative "caring", of the "I want to make them suffer"), a kind of Evil which is very rare in real life even if it's the most common in the movie "evil guy" stereotype.
As I've learned (from amongst other things working in the Finance Industry), the most common Evil is people knowingly doing things harmful to others to make money for themselves, get (more) power and influence or simply satisfy petty internal desires such as wanting to feel dominance over others (this later being, IMHO, the core of Moralism).
That's fair, but we also don't know that he doesn't actively hate women. Just because you don't want someone dead doesn't mean you don't have active hatred for them.
Most evil is banal, but quite a few people move to hating groups that they initially were hurting out of self interested gain. I've seen plenty of hate and it's often a means of bypassing empathy for some reason or another
More accurately: someone raped a 14 year old girl, the pregnancy has become ectopic. The punishment for trying to save her life is worse than the person who raped a 14 year old.
Is it normal in the USA to allow the general population to use deadly force? That's fucked up.
How'd the USA get to be a nation in the first place?
Lots of ifs/ands/ors/ and buts. Varies by state and generally only under legally defined self defense situations with some judicial discrepancy, mind you it varies by state and some regions are so loose with it that you can just get murdered by going on someone's property. Which may make sense if you live in the middle of fucking nowhere and give warnings and are a thirty minute drive from another person but there have been cases where shit like that happens in suburbs,.
Uuhh... Yeah? Second amendment.
I swear to god they’re trying to legislate a civil war. They preach us vs them political rhetoric and want everyone running around with a gun. What a shit time to call yourself an American, but then again I’m not sure there ever was a good time.
I swear to god they’re trying to legislate a civil war.
Yes. Thats what they want. They want a mass uprising that they can use to suspend rule of law, elections, etc, so trump can become el' presidente' for life and commence to doing whatever the republicans want to do, free from oversight of law, courts, etc.
I suddenly want to play Tropico.
I think its also them seeing vigilantism as a way to get around constitutional requirements like due process and the 8th amendment. This is the kind of law people created by people who see the constitution as an obstacle.
It is somewhat comforting that they still see the constitution as a barrier to the hellscape they envision for society.
Playing around with the monopoly of violence in the US strikes me as a bad idea.
But yes, they're mobilizing the klan again.
Here is the proposed text of the NC state constitutional amendment affirming personhood at conception, then including:
Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person.
Here is the NC Dept. of Health and Human Service’s required abortion information describing the state’s abortion laws. They ban after 12 weeks, with exceptions for rape and incest before 20 weeks, and life-threatening anomalies before 24 weeks.
Here from the Raleigh Observer quoting state democratic lawmaker Rep. Julie von Haefen:
Von Haefen said the bill is a distraction from other bills being voted on and passed, including multiple constitutional amendments concerning unions and taxes, at least some of which will be on the ballot for North Carolinians to weigh. She said the amendments “are being used to drive conservative voter turnout.”
And here is my take: NC state republicans use women’s healthcare as a political pawn for pushing anti-worker and anti-tax interests, which neatly encapsulates the US culture war for the past 60 years. This bill will not pass, because it is insane, but it may succeed in its intent: looting the pockets of the people of NC.
This bill will not pass, because it is insane, but it may succeed in its intent: looting the pockets of the people of NC.
how many times have we said "It wont happen, it cant happen, its too insane" in the past 10 years? only for it to very much happen?
Killing live people - women, children, POCs, poor, other countries, etc - has always been acceptable and even promoted by Republicans. It's only ending potential pregnancies when they "care" about lives. Except of course when it's their wife, mistress, daughter who wants an abortion, then it's ok.
The Only Moral Abortion Is My Abortion
This is 26 years old and still worth your time if you've never read it.
If I were to summarize how this fits into long term republican vision of society it would be the following.
"Abortion, like healthcare, home ownership, and free speech is a thing we should reserve solely to for the wealthy and anybody making less than 2 million a year should not have access to any of these things"
2 million a year is a close to perfect way to divide the owning class for the rest of us. A surgeon has more in common with a grocery store clerk than a CEO and people really don't understand that.
Honestly in some ways the actual number doesn't matter, if you earn your living by selling your labor for a salary or wages you aren't the problem
"Rules for thee, not for me."
has always been acceptable by
RepublicansAmericans
Fixed that for you
This could be a completely serious Orphan Crushing Machine solution in the minds of conservative basic dickheads.
"If somebody is already gonna go out in a blaze of glory, why not point them towards doctors and women's healthcare rather than schools? Nailed it."



top 100 comments