To anyone scrolling by wanting to take an intro to Indigenous history crash course, Indigenous Canada is offered free through coursera and the University of Alberta. 12 modules over 2 weeks (flexible). Can recommend.
post
I’m a bit mixed on this one.
Canada, and the US, right up to 1978, without a doubt enacted systemic genocide against the indigenous people of North America. And after this point, there was a systematic effort to avoid responsibility for it, while the victims were still dealing with the fallout.
In fact, you could argue that even the reservation laws (you needed to live on the reservation to claim indigenous status) were genocidal, especially as the reserves were often moved to places difficult to survive, and often places with limited available drinking water.
But the determination here appears to conflate avoiding responsibility with the actual act itself. This makes it much more difficult to get politicians to actually accept responsibility and ensure that the genocidal acts are stopped at the policy level and the immediate results of the policies are dealt with — because the list of reparations could be infinite.
In most cases, indigenous communities are actually asking for LESS in reparations than is warranted by the documented acts. But they’re not even going to get a recognition of wrongdoing if the result isn’t something that can be decidedly acted upon. And so everyone loses.
This is horrible, what was done to the Indigenous peoples in Canada. It's horrible if done to any people. I think the word genocide is a bit strong in this case but, to open a can of worms, at what point are we no longer responsible for the sins of our fathers?
"Genocide" is in fact appropriate when speaking of some specific tribes—ask any Beothuk. Oh, wait . . .
Granted, not many tribes were completely destroyed, so the pedantically correct charge in most cases is probably attempted (but not successful) genocide. At what point does the government, and by extension the non-indigenous population of Canada, cease to be held responsible? All I can say is, not yet. The last residential schools didn't close all that long ago, and the government is still periodically lashing out in court against its treaty obligations toward Indigenous peoples. At minimum, we have several more generations to go.
at what point are we no longer responsible for the sins of our fathers?
When everyone is living well.
"How terrible, but not that bad." Yup, that's a Canadian.
Changing what I said is what the billionaire media does. Good on you, you have big aspirations.
"You're working for the billionaires by recognizing genocide of indigenous peoples." How tf don't you drown in the shower?
The article after giving context about genocide by mentionning the grave of indigenous children talk about recent genocidal policies effective today. So yeah the article is not about blaming today people for the sins of their fathers like you claimed
I claimed nothing. I asked a question.
You asked a rhetorical question to pass the claim that people blame currrnt people for the sin of their fathers, while the article critisize current genocidal policies

all 22 comments