top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 180 points 5 months ago (5 children)

These two really need to just kiss already.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I feel like Fuentes is probably out of the Rat King's league. He seems to have at least heard of a toothbrush, and Ashley St. Clair claims that he's much better read than most online fascists (which tracks with what I've seen of him, he's at least aware of history and politics even if his conclusions are batshit).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 114 points 5 months ago* (9 children)

    Of the two people on earth that shouldn't be judging others on their looks, I would wager asmongold and Fuentes would be in the top 5. They look like walking herpes outbreaks.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    asmongold yeah but fuentes' attractiveness is only bogged down by his personality/politics and that stupid haircut. fix those problems and he's chained to my radiator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You should probably chain him to your radiator anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    I'm imagining him bald. Always take away the hair if it's distracting. Suddenly he's a dodgy plumber that never finishes the job right and is postponing legal trouble by putting the business in their mother's name.

    By contrast, asmongold is a solid 4.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    that is the most offhand justification for being gay ever

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    But still a valid justification for being gay. And I'd hazard it's a requirement that you find men far more attractive than women. Because if you don't, then you are merely Bi, (and might have the best of all worlds-- we need more science on that I think).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not gay but the man i sleep with is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    This isn't me being gay, it's science

    It can also be you being ultra, super-duper, neon pink gay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    "I'm not gay, its perfectly natural and totally hetro-masculine to get a boner over chiseled, glistening men.. Its just science!"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    I had a deeply religious room mate freshman year of college. He watched 300 at least 5 times in theaters and IDK how many times on DVD. I can only assume for the glistening chiseled men because its not that good. I always thought he was repressing his desires and this was the only way he could let them out at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The argument about birds is ignorant because of basic behaviour ecology. Arguing from Zahavis handicap hypothesis males display strength by giving themselves a handicap. Being highly visible, lumbered with pointless feathers.

    Females are camouflaged since they often are the ones on the nest.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Hmmm that sounds pretty gay you guys

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 56 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    If you polled 100 bi people, I’d be surprised if you got fewer than 90 who said that they find women more attractive on average.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago*

    For me, its true that women are more attractive on average, but if i find a good looking guy, i like them more.

    I like guys, its just that most of them are not particulatly attractive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I'm an outlier; I realized that the more androgynous someone is, the hotter they are. If I can't tell what you are, I'm turned on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Sorry, not attracted to sheets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 5 months ago

    Individuals are beautiful or ugly based on what an individual likes/dislikes. Not an entire gender. And no one has ever needed makeup, that is a choice, not a requirement. Putting makeup on someone you find repulsive will not make them acceptable, how stupid these people are.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Thought this was a shitpost at first

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    "no homo, but I like dudes"

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Women need makeup?

    I think the reality is that women like make up mixed with gendered expectations. I think there's a difference.

    Besides, listen, if you think men are better looking than women you might be gay and that's actually ok. It's sad that these guys are so homophobic that they can't grapple with their own feelings lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Men and women. Males and females. Girls and boys. People are obsessed with gender to the point they forget we're all just human.

    Last night I was watching these two chuds watch one of my favourite movies (Children of Men) and one of them, responding to Julianne Moore's character's behaviour said "Ah, I HATE women like that!" and it genuinely caused my brain to skip a beat. There was nothing about the character's actions that was specific to female behaviour. I don't understand why he couldn't have said "I hate PEOPLE like that."

    I am an aspiring writer. I did a beta reader swap with one of my colleagues who just like me would like to be a sci-fi author. He was desperate to know how I was "so good" at writing women. Dude, lol, it's not hard. Literally all you have to do to avoid all the men-writing-women pitfalls is remember that women are human beings first and women second, with all the same desires, hopes and fears as men.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago

    No one cares what you two ugly clowns think... Just shut up and piss off already.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    "Peak aesthetic form" lol

    There are more statues of men because most statues were made of historical figures and most historical figures were men, due to gender roles and suppression of women

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The male peacock is the gayest bird with all those fancy feathers.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    These guys are so gay and so closeted they don’t even know it themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Wait, are these not out gay guys circlejerking for lols?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago* (5 children)

    They are prominent right wing political influencers. So, in a sense, yes but they’re doing it with zero self awareness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Amazing. I'm having real trouble wrapping my head around that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago*

    I'm surprised you don't know who they are. Nick Fuentes is on record as saying Hitler was a cool guy and that he was tired of pretending he wasn't. He's mad at Trump for not being extreme enough.

    Oh yeah and Asmondgild has admitted to using the smell of a rotting rat corpse as an alarm clock when the sun hearts it up.

    They both are true museum quality specimin for the "master" race.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Are we going to completely ignore the fact that male birds are prettied up SPECIFICALLY TO IMPRESS THEIR LADY COUNTERPARTS? Holy mother of fuck

    Like biologically these critters by and large are programmed to behave in “please like me and have babies” ways. If these dorks are going to make those comparisons they’d better start building impressive houses and wearing colorful clothes to make women happy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    and the fact that female birds need to have that bland colouring as camouflage since they incubate the eggs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    As a bird lover I do have to note that some female birds have intricate colorings that humans can't see given our limited visible spectrum capabilities. Birds are tetrachromats, they can see UV for the most part. Starlings are a good example.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Coming from the beady-eyed trash rodent, that means nothing anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    One lives in his basement and never showers and the other has all gay friends whom are nazies thru and thru.

    These two deserve each other, fucking losers.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    That man cry-wanks

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    This reminded me how one day I was thinking I knew him only marginally, one of the many talking heads with sometimes weird opinions, and a little after that I saw a clip of one of his horrible takes and blocked his ugly mug right away. Funny how fate works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Incel losers clearly have attractiveness that is off the charts and too intimidating for anybody male or female to deal with. It's so bad they can't even fuck each other, because of the sheer levels of attractiveness involved.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Can we go back to ridiculing and ostracizing the village idiots instead of letting them amalgamate into a hivemind? Thanks

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago
    • "OP is not gay"
    • *Brings example from ancient Greece*
  • source
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    I stopped paying attention to Asmongoloid years ago. He was funny when he was losing his shit over WOW, but his takes on politics are fucking idiotic. He just says whatever he thinks will get the most clicks.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I've heard of Asmongoloid, seems like a troll, I've never watched his videos so I had no idea he was gay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    His online name is Asmongold, but I called him Asmongoloid as a way of calling him a moron without using the "R" word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's the same thing as just saying retarded. Why not just call him retarded? I do not think you're woke if you call someone a mongoloid who doesn't call himself that. There's nothing you can do to walk it back either, I already know you're not woke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    We're so cooked as a society when someone as unread, uneducated, ignorant, etc., as asmongold can just decide one day to be political (I'm sure no money was involved at all) and start spreading the dumbest propaganda to millions of young men and boys.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago*

    Remember how society did that to Michael? This is toxic masculinity doing this to gay men.

    Edit: the expectations, the racism, the surgeries.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    "naturally attractive" do these idiots seriously think that attractiveness is objective?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    but if theyre naturally attractive then that means that attractive is the same for everyone

    cant be naturally attractive because attractiveness is subjective

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    So stupid. Arguing from a patriarchal society's beauty standards and not even noticing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Two someones needs to go back into the closet before they start loosing followers.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Anyone in their social circles could have answered easily and positively to that other thread "have you ever met actually dumb people?"

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Ewww girls.

    🙄

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I love how the 'source' link is actually named 'sauce'. Error? Maybe. Fitting? Absolutely!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    There was a trend pre covid of using different S words instead of "source". "Salsa", "salami", etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›