top 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 190 points 5 months ago (17 children)

One time I was at a grocery store and they sold out of a particular drink I liked.

A manager was standing nearby and I asked when they would restock it.

"Never." He said. "It always sells out and I don't want to constantly order and restock it, so I'm not going to get more."

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Reminds me of the story of the warehouseman who refused to give someone the last of an item in the warehouse because that would mean they'd be out of stock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Ah. There's a reasons for that, as told to me by a supply sergeant in the military. A lot of suppliers had a BEL (Basic Equipment List), which says all stock must have a minimum and a maximum of XYZ in order to meet government spec. Some large items, like diesel generators, have a BEL minimum of 2, but also because of their size and storage complexity, have a maximum of 2. So it order to get a new one, you must get rid of one of the old ones. But if you get rid of the old one, you are below minimum BEL, and could fail inspection or an inventory check, if it takes a while to get a new one. Large items don't always "hang around," but they get manufactured on demand, so the only way to get a new one is to be without one for a very long period of time. Thus, you risk failing inspection. The best way to avoid that is to keep two and never order any.

    Military logic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    On top of that, everything is ordered by article number. So it happened on a boat that they needed two replacement bolts for the engine. The engineer wrote the order, and the captain signed it and sent it to HQ.

    They were informed the order would take (a long time). When they finally got the word that the order was in, they were astonished that two heavy load trucks were waiting for them. Each containing a turbine nearly as big as their boat. Which had nearly the same inventory number as the bolts. With two digits switched.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago

    Reminds me of my buddy’s story from his time as a warehouse manager for Blockbuster (yeah, we’re old…) Blockbuster’s management did loss prevention and breakage based on item count, not item value. If a new hire shoved a $30 DVD down their pants and walked out with it every week, corporate wouldn’t care. After all, it was only 1 DVD each week. And 1 is an acceptably low number. But if that same hire shoved a $5 box of 100 pencils down their pants, corporate would lose their fucking minds. Because each pencil was counted as 1 item, so they were suddenly 100 items short.

    It was sort of an open secret in the warehouse that if you were going to steal something, you should only go for the high value shit. And only do it if nobody else had already done so recently. So if the system said you had 5 in stock and there were 5 in the bin, it was open season. Because as long as you only stole one of them, corporate wouldn’t care. But if you pocketed a dozen 50¢ “impulse buy next to the register” toys, loss prevention would be patting people down as they clocked out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    While I get the joke, I feel obliged to point out that the military is one of the very few places this could potentially makes sense (not saying it does in this case): You can basically decide that the warehouse is responsible for holding emergency stock, not ordering materiel that is produced on-demand for daily use. Essentially, if it's produced on-demand, why would you want to go via to warehouse to get it? There are plenty of reasons you could want that of course, but if we ignore those, then the rationale can make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    I worked at a printing factory once, and we often needed to replace roller pins for paper, it's an enormous metal cylinders that, despite being couple of tons hunks of metal, were very prone to being harmed. They were in pairs and should've been changed in pairs so they wear out evenly. The problem is, in a warehouse, the item is "a pair of pins" but the task for a repair crew is "change a pin" which includes ordering a transportation. The problem is, if you're making a "change of a pin" you can only order a "transportation of a pin", but warehouse can only issue a "pair of pins", which transportation can't move. The corpo spent weeks trying to solve this conundrum, until the machine broke completely (a roller pin snapped if you can imagine that). After spending the entire year's revenue on fixing it all, they fired a bunch of people for following their corporate rules too precisely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    That's how Dylan Moran runs his bookstore in Black Books.

    Paraquoting off the top of my head: "Customers?? Who wanted to buy something???? What the hell do you treat them nicely for?!" ... "You don't get it; Paying customers who get what they want means books get sold. Which means you have to restock them and deal with additional customers!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I asked about a certain type of cake that was on sale and wasn't in stock. I asked when it would be in stock. The manager launched into a big complaint, because they always sold out when it was on sale. See, he only ever ordered 10, because they never sold more than 10, and when it was on sale, they would sell out immediately.

    He got very upset, calling me stupid when I said "If you only have 10, it would be pretty hard to sell more than 10".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I worked in retail for a while, and it was staggering to uncover that the majority of people with the control over inventory thought the same way.

    • It takes 21 days for an ordered item to arrive at the store
    • A manager orders 5
    • 21 days later, 5 come in
    • 2 days later, all 5 are sold
    • A month goes by and the person sighs, frustrated that they have to order more while simultaneously not understanding why sales are down.

    Have you ever considered ordering 10 or 20 to see if they sell out in 4 to 8 days or less? Maybe then order 40 or 60?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 148 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago*

    You don't get it though! If you just let the absolute greediest people in the world keep all their profit then they'll definitely share with you!

    I actually had a coworker say a few months ago that he's a Regan Republican because he believed in trickle down economics... I literally said "really man? And how many more decades of being wrong do you need before you realize it still doesn't work, is five decades enough?" To which he didn't have a reply...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Somebody once told me they don't read recreationally because authors are lazy for making readers do all the work of imagining what their story looks like. He was completely sincere, and actually became agitated at the idea of people reading anything beyond manuals or mandatory sorts of things.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    I had a similar talk with a guy in his 30's, who said that books didn't have nearly enough information density for his hyper intelligent super brain. "It's ok, if you're a slow reader, you can fix that with practice!" was apparently not the answer he wanted to hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 63 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    This is second hand from a friend, but he said he overheard a conversation between 2 coworkers:

    Person A: looks like you got some sun this weekend

    Person B (badly sunburned): Yeah, I just bought a convertible and did a lot of driving with the top down. I figured that the wind would stop me from getting sunburned, but I guess it wasn't cold enough

    Person A: That's... not how that works

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    My family always called it windburn. Not that it was caused by the wind, but that because you have airflow you don't feel as hot so you dont think your being burned.

    I got second degree burns over most of my body on a FL beach through sunscreen in the 90s similarly. 0/10 do not recommend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 59 points 5 months ago

    giving rich people more money is important for 'job creation'.

    the lie that killed the middle class

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I've already told that story but anyway: a relative told me that the GDPR was a conspiracy from Europe to destroy the European internet (why? why not!)

    So that guy literally deleted his own web site (full of old stuff, it was a big project) so that... he would not be forced to delete his own web site by the big bad Europe.

    He is also anti-vax, and allergic to Wifi and Bluetooth... except when he is in our house filled with Wifi and Bluetooth (but we have never told him, he could die!)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    He is also anti-vax, and allergic to Wifi and Bluetooth… except when he is in our house filled with Wifi and Bluetooth (but we have never told him, he could die!)

    A relative of my husband always requests we turn off the router, because she's allergic to 5g. She starts feeling nauseous and itchy when it's turned on. We used to sigh and just do it.

    However, I've found out she's not actually allergic to 5g or wifi, it turns out she's actually developed a reaction to the power light. Ever since I put a tiny bit of tape of the little green power light, she stopped complaining about the wifi entirely! My husband won't let me tell her about this amazing medical breakthrough though, I wonder why.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 100 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Your call is important to us. Please stay on the line and a representative will be with you shortly.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    I’ll toss in a voice menu with no option for buttons and mashing zero doesn’t get you a rep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Add tthe newfangled ai bots into the voice menu and it's a back and forth between your problem and "I don't understand your problem, could you repeat that?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    The damn things pick up on every tiny, insignificant noise in the background, too. You don’t have to say anything and sometimes it’ll go, “Sorry, I didn’t get that.” No shit, I didn’t say anything, someone simply slammed a car door shut outside.

    Good luck to all the parents who try to navigate those menus while their kids are around…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    "This isn't what I voted for!"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    My father told me I shouldn't use regular table salt because "they" were mixing powdered glass in so that it would work its way through your system and embed itself in your heart muscles.

    He had called me after I got high though, so I gave him the best kid glove treatment I've ever managed.

    Told him that was very interesting. Explained that he could easily prove and expose the conspiracy by pouring salt into a bucket of distilled water. The salt would dissolve, but the glass would sink to the bottom. He could then filter the glass out, then boil the water off to recover the salt safely. He hasn't brought it up since.

    My dad is a sweet guy and good at handyman stuff, but dear lord, almost nothing higher level. I truly think it's the lead exposure.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    I worked with this dude who i thought was pretty chill. Then one day we're talking about the future of the world and he tells me that he thinks global warming is a punishment from god coz we legalised gay people getting married in Australia. I thought he was joking and took me a few minutes to realise this guy was dead serious

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    For context im in Australia and this was when gay marriage was legalised back in 2017

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    But still, punishing the whole world for Australia?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Sounds about right. Global warming didn't exist in Australia before 2017

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago

    Some old lady was over fir dinner and she asked me why i only eat certain things. I told her that i don't eat meat. It took some time for her to compute and fired back: but you can eat fish. I said, no, because they are animals too. You could see the gears spinning again before she said that banger: i don't think that's true, because they don't even bleed.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    A coworker of mine thinks that climate change isn't real and that believing that humans have the capability is pure hubris. And a few months after he told me that, he claimed that windmills were making tornados worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [+] 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I was once stopped by an elderly couple.

    One side of the couple was arguing that the sun went out at night.

    The other couple was arguing that the moon covered over the sun at night, and that's why we couldn't see the sun.

    They asked me to clarify which one of them was correct as an independent third party, and I told them that the earth rotates, and so when you can't see the sun, it's because it's on the other side of the planet.

    They both paused for a moment, looked at each other, and then looked at me and said, "oh, yeah", and that was the end of the argument.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›