Plex has announced a massive price increase on the service's Lifetime Plex Pass. On July 1, the lifetime subscription option will go from $249.99 to $749.99, an increase of 200%. The price hike will only apply to new subscribers, with no changes to monthly or annual subscription pricing.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 109 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Literally 10x the price I paid for mine

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 5 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 114 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    Early rejector club. Jellyfin gang.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (12 children)

    I have underwear older then jellyfin. Plex was the only option for some time

    Edit: Alright, alright, it wasn't the only option, but it was the cleanest/easiest way to make a home server feel like a streaming service that I knew of at the time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    It was?

    I started streaming video in around 2001. Over SMB. Using VLC as the client.

    Then I switched to using iTunes as a server.

    Then came XMPP/Kodi.

    And eventually, Jellyfin.

    Every few years, I’ve tried Plex, and it’s never done quite what I wanted, and required security/privacy compromises. About the only thing it has going for it is that the client and the server will run on just about anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I was using MythTV long before Plex came around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I guess what I should have said was "only one of its kind". As far as I knew, it was the only one that did all the metadata stuff to give it the "streaming service" feel. Being able to share my library to others outside my home without hassle was also big

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    That was before the streaming services or most of the current VPN recommendations existed and Myth was mainly competing with TiVo. So, you could set up a front end remotely, but it would have been painful.

    They've always done metadata collection though. What Plex added was the connection so you don't need to set up a VPN for remote access.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The scary part and the reason I never paid is because I think they will shut down plex soon. No one is paying for streaming services anymore and those giants will start coming down on the gov to do something about it. EU is coming down pretty hard on IPTV and torrent sites already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    The EU shouldn't because most of those streaming services are American. So it's only good for us if people pirate. It offsets some of the tariffs Trump has levied.

    And it's those services' own fault. They offered a decent value for money for years. Now they keep wanting more and more. Rising fees, content disappearing to other platforms but still asking for more money. Adding ads and then asking for money to remove them. Eventually people are sick of it and go like 🖕

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    My Jellyfin server goes, "Burrrrrrr!"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly, I made the switch about 6 months ago and haven't looked back once. The Jellyfin native Android TV app is a bit lacking, but I recently installed Wholpin and find it much better!

    My only other gripe is that Plex allows you to set subtitle and audio language preferences per library while JF only allows one preference for the whole server. This is annoying for those of us enjoying foreign language films, where I often end up having to play with the settings every time I want to watch a foreign feature.

    I've also heard that some people miss the syndication of Plex, where you have one account connected to many servers. I only connect to my own, so don't know much about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 67 points 5 months ago (65 children)

    I don't know why anyone would pay that instead of using Jellyfin. I've had my server up for years now and it works great.

  • source
  • hideshow 65 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (29 children)

    Last I looked, jellyfin auth and public facing security were less than ideal.

    How far has that come in the last few years? I have plenty of people using my Plex and it's been secure. I had heard a public facing Jellyfin wasn't super secure.

    Honestly, 95% of the reason I use Plex is so I don't have to manage user passwords and troubleshoot issues for my friends and family. I just grant access.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    This. I run a Kubernetes cluster and self host tons of shit . . . but I do NOT want to be dealing with client issues for Boomer relatives and worrying about securing servers that a Samsung TV needs to auth with

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I moved from the default jellyfin login method to using Authentik as the identity provider. Now its part of my homelab setup where all services have SSO, and I don't have to create/manage an account for each person for each service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Does that break Jellyfin apps on smart TVs or media devices?

    A lot of people seem to have concerns with how Jellyfin handles access control and some have stated that the developers marked some major issues as “won’t fix”. Is there somewhere I can catch up on that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    LDAP works fine, OIDC not so much, only the web client would work.

    There are still talks around making OIDC a first class citizen and IIRC it is planned as per the feature page but I guess the major core upgrade around the DB took a lot of attention the last 6-12 months.

    But in the meantime I've just spun up an LDAP outpost for my Authentik that my Jellyfin connects to. It breaks MFA but otherwise it works. It may be a bit confusing for users that they log in at jellyfin.site.com but anything user-related like updating password is at authentik.site.com and requires an extra login.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (24 children)

    I only need my server to work locally so I haven't messed with that part personally. But I've read that setting up tailscale is straightforward and works fine. There are many other solutions to the problem. I would definitely invest a lot of effort before paying for Plex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (23 children)

    Great; how do I setup Tailscale on my mother’s Roku TV?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (17 children)

    Unfortunately, that's probably not gonna happen without some new hardware.

    You could setup a wire guard at the router (can you setup tail scale on a router? idk). If she's renting the ISP router, replacing that could save a 100+ a year, depending on how much the isp is scamming her for it.

    or you could repurpose a minipc/nuc from bay and set up a jellyfin streaming box with tailscale.

    If you have the extra hardware, you could also setup a local server with her jellyfin and use wiregaurd/tailscale to remotely connect to it and run backup/sync during off-hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (6 children)

    You could also set up a reverse proxy in front of your Jellyfin and hook a domain up to it. That way you don't have to worry about the client at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Still have that nasty vulnerability where people can delete your data remotely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    The data for me is shared read-only to the Jellyfin container, so that's not a problem.

    Can you explain more about that vulnerability? It would necessitate a pretty serious privilege escalation to be possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    So, no answer because I can’t. I’m not replicating buying hardware for all of the people who are on my plex account to move them to some free software because all y’all who shout “Jellyfin” do so because you do t want to pay for anything.

    Why doesn’t anyone ever mention Emby? Oh, right, because you have to support the project and no one wants to do that.

    Plex isn’t in the right here, but yelling Jellyfin ever. Single. Time. Is like using a hammer to tighten a screw; it’s not always the right tool for the job and tall look like morons for just blindly parroting what others say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Bro, if you want to use Emby, nobody is stopping you. Jellyfin is the popular solution because it is open source. Emby isn't a project, it's a product just like plex is a product. Both Emby and Plex started as free methods to host your media and converted to a paid closed source solution. Jellyfin is a fork of Emby from before they moved to closed source and remains free and open to this day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    No one is stopping you from recommending it either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I really hope Emby pays you well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    They pay me nothing, I hope Jellyfin pays you well.

    Right, they can’t because no one pays for it; you all love it because it’s free and you never have to pay. That’s why everyone wants people to use it and ignore Emby.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    You're a weird one. I donate regularly to my most used open source projects if they have a primary development team. But that's not even the point. The point is, open source software isn't usually published as a way to make loads of money. Usually open source software is created out of necessity or as a passion project. You won't convince many Lemmy users that a corporate product meant to generate capital is the better use of time and resources by such a wide margin that we should spend our money on it. Jellyfin exists despite Emby closing source. Feel free to continue to pay for Emby. I'll use the community resources that are on offer for free and are more than good enough for my use case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-ar300m/

    Configure one of these to sit between the TV and your mother's network and pass all the tv traffic through an exit node on your jellyfin network.

    Most smart TVs have a tailscale app you can install directly on device. Roku is an exception to that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I love their routers but that one doesn't have tailscale support, even if you did manage to install it (I did so on a mango) I think it would run extremely poorly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Funny enough I actually meant to link this one, which is specifically for this purpose. https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-mt5000/

    That's okay though because the guy I was replying to didn't actually want the help. He just wanted to complain that people aren't recommending his preferred software.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    That's a better choice, got one myself the other day, haven't actually had a chance to try it but their support has literally sent me firmware ahead of release (for mango), they fix their stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Nope. How do I do it on the TV directly?

    I bring this up every time someone parrots off the Lemmy line of “Jellyfin” because that’s all you all know. Not what’s best for the use case, just ram Jellyfin in there shortcoming and all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago* (16 children)

    I haven’t checked in on Jellyfin for a while now, but don’t they still have issues with hardware transcoding support?

    Not to mention the lack of software clients on other platforms for just playback that Plex has been established on for years and even multiple device generations like with PlayStation, Roku, Fire Stick, etc.?

    Also you have to configure your own reverse proxy / Tailscale set up to securely access a content library remotely, right - as opposed Plex’s relatively simpler remote access configuration?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago* (9 children)

    Surprise, surprise, a paid product with salaried developers has more features than a volunteer project!

    More people using Jellyfin, more people who will contribute, through code or donations. It's worth a downside to swap over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Hopefully that gets better - I run both side by side pointed at the same folders so the exact same media is available in both. I offer all my friends the choice and list every alternate app I know of, inevitably they all prefer Plex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Because default settings arent always ideal...
    Some goes for the TV they use and whatever codec they can digest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    What defaults are you talking about? If you meant to reply to my other comment, I'm talking about hardware transcoding codec support settings on the server, it has nothing to do with what codec is chosen for a client - that decision is made separately. Once the codec the client needs is chosen, the hardware transcoding setting only changes whether they codec is decoded using CPU or GPU/quicksync by the server - it has no effect on codec selection. The only reason you would disable hardware transcoding for a codec that your server is capable of hardware transcoding is if your hardware is faulty or produces undesirable output for that codec when using hardware transcoding - most people don't do this, it's a fairly uncommon edge case. And disabling it won't stop clients from accessing that codec, it just means that your server will CPU transcode it if requested instead of using hardware acceleration - so again it has nothing to do with client support or TVs because all it does is switch your server between hardware and software encoding / decoding. The only sane default for that setting is to hardware accelerate codecs that your PC is capable of hardware accelerating if hardware acceleration is enabled. There's no reason not to automatically detect hardware capabilities like Plex does, instead of the current "default" where you enable hardware transcoding and then have to figure out what your hardware supports to be hardware accelerated.

    Like even if they copy pasted the quicksync codec support table from Wikipedia into the server hardware acceleration settings that would be miles better because then you wouldn't have to look up that information separately. Or, hear me out, just show next to each option which ones your computer is capable of hardware decoding vs CPU decoding.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    More people using Jellyfin, more people who will contribute, through code or donations.

    Doubt.

    What about Emby? Why is that never mentioned?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Because Emby is a closed source application and Lemmy is an open source platform with community member who prefer open source solutions to closed source. Your out here screaming at Linux bros "why not choose apple??"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Ok. And sometimes closed source applications work better.

    I guarantee that you’re using closed source software So let’s not throw stones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I didn't suggest I wasn't using closed source software or even that one was better than the other. I said you are in a community of open source enthusiasts scratching your head as to why nobody recommends a paid closed source application that has a history of turning it's back on the FOSS community. I'm trying to give you a hint and you're trying to die on a very strange hill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Especially on non-GPU systems, Jellyfin is slower at transcoding than Plex. I don’t know the internals, but I have both running in the sam machine, and Plex is always noticeably more responsive. Not by a huge margin, but still it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I have zero experience with those two products but when it comes to transcoding there are various toggles that affect the quality and speed.

    It looks also like commercial products generally optimize for speed while open source tends to be more concerned about quality.

    Of course this could be completely wrong in this case but that's the general tendency I noticed. Do they allow to change settings?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    I have not personally experienced any issues with hardware transcoding. My server is an old Dell Optiplex and I use clients on Linux, Android, Roku and Shield.

    Yes you are correct about remote access and if that was a priority for me, I would happily learn that part instead of paying for Plex.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    What kinds of issues? I put an Intel Arc in my server and it's working fine AFAICT.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    I have an ~80GB movie that I can watch on a TV that can't even handle the data rate for that file, nevermind the codecs.

    But if the couple minutes to click "this client can't handle anything over 60Mbps x264" is too much work, then by all means keep paying for Plex. Or "hypothetically" find a smaller copy of that movie.

    I'm always amazed by the number of people who absolutely can't leave Plex because they've got 14 grandparents streaming 8k rips all day every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (12 children)

    It's essentially a one time fee for an indefinite service of handling the vpn side of the setup.

    I use Jellyfin on my local network and plex externally because I don't know how to route specific traffic with openvpn on my phone and can't be bothered switching it off and on when streaming things 😅

    I'm not sure how it's sustainable, and am surprised they still offer the life pass at all though.

    I guess a lot of people buy it who don't need it?

    I still probably wouldn't pay the current price for it though, I got it about a decade ago lol.

    Oh also plexamp has a better UX than jellyfin for music, but I don't think that alone would justify the current price.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Tailscale is the answer to easily and remotely access jellyfin and your server. Its easy to setup and very secure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Dude seriously it's so much easier than anything else. For a personal media server with remote access, jellyfin + tailscale on an old computer you may have laying around plugged into your router is all you need

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yep, exactly what I've been telling people. And then they complain that tvs dont have the ability to have the tailscale app on them. So, then buy a cheap android box, even an Onn 4K from Walmart would work for like 25 bucks and install tailscale and jellyfin on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    True again. That's what I run upstairs and downstairs on my TVs. If I'm not mistaken, you should be able to use RPis for the same sort of thing if you really really didn't wanna touch any Google stuff, which I would understand.

    I also totally get people having slightly different uses for their media servers, like maybe they share their collection with friends and family members who aren't as tech literate/don't wanna use a Google TV when they already stream everything else on their PS5 for example. For those purposes, it has especially made sense historically to go with Plex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Well, my android boxes have degoogled roms on them so no google dependencies or requirements.

    Yeah, I mean it all depends on what a person wants. I just immediately went with Jellyfin and tailscale from the beginning and couldnt be happier.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I didn't find it that easy to set up 😅

    but I'm sure I would find it easier if I was more motivated e.g. saving $750 by setting it up 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I don’t believe plex pass acts as a vpn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    How much do you donate to jellyfin? If I sum up my 20 bucks per year for the next 50 years, I end up with 1000 bucks. If I wanted to pay today, I'd donate even more to jellyfin. (Neglecting inflation)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I haven't looked at Emby in a long time. Last I checked, it wasn't as capable or feature rich as Jellyfin or Plex

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Plex announces that it is tired of having all of these customers buying their software

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Wait wait wait so… you pay THEM to let YOU share YOUR media? Wha?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Not a one time buy which would at least make sense. No no! Its a monthly fee AND half the time they require a Internet connection and checkin. Just to SELF HOST.

    Yeah, the DRM has to make sure your subscription is up to date. For the service you provide all the hardware for. The service you will personally have to install and maintain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Not really. What Plex is selling is a relay service, so you can connect to your home media remotely, just like you can do with Tailscale etc. the second thing they are selling is user management, easily share media library with other people. Both of these are hard to set up for many people in Jellyfin

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That's just gonna drive lazy people to learn how to use something open source like Jellyfin.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Lazy ones will just keep paying monthly. Industrious ones might move to jellyfin. The main thing this will do is separate a few fools from their money get people to stop buying lifetime passes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    It's safe to say they want people to be stuck paying monthly so they can have more consistent income i guess.

    At least when paying monthly it's easier to see the worth in swapping to Jellyfin (because you aren't trying to maximize the 1k you dropped for lifetime).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    103 comments in c/selfhosted@lemmy.world view that post