Hmm, I'll have to play around with it a bit more then to see if I can trigger it.

My only gripe is the browser autofill. Sometimes it triggers correctly and sometimes it doesn't. I've noticed if I let KeePass add in a new login itself after I've manually entered it then it's much more receptive to suggesting that login correctly going forward. So I'm tempted to create a brand new database and login everything manually so KeePass will create the database entries itself to fix my gripe.

Oh, well, I'm talking about not having to password-lock and unlock your stuff constantly. For long-term storage, sure, that's fine; anything else would be way too tedious, though, no? I guess it depends on your use case and if you could locally automate the locking and unlocking or something.

Solid question; there are only third-party apps. A recent discussion in !syncthing@lemmy.ml led me to most recently adopt BasicSync, which is incredibly low-profile and is probably the closest thing we can get to it.

However... if you want to get as pure as possible, you can apparently run Syncthing's Linux version directly in Termux on Android without the need for a dedicated Android app. There are also entire alternatives to Syncthing like syncspirit (which can also be run through Termux and which I'm considering trying as well).

Syncthing Fork works well for Android

For other websites, if I search for 'passkey' on the KeePass website feature list nothing comes up. Plugins in a password manager sketch me out a bit tbh lol

Whoa, thanks. I had no idea this was a thing...

Hmm, interesting, though isn't that a fault of the organization not having an account-linking system so that each person could have their own credentials but can still access the unified content? This workaround seems... flimsy, unless I'm not picturing a legit scenario in which no other method is as good, or something.

Yes, no conflicts. I don't know if you can only share part of vault; I just created a separate one for a separate team.

I wouldn't put it in Google Drive or anything like that. The separate sync logic will definitely cause conflicts.

I'm not worried about having access if I'm offline, because if I'm offline I'm not going to be able to log into anything anyway.

Gotta use the right tool for the job. Sorry KeePass doesn't work for you. It really is a fantastic piece of software.

I edited the comment, see my reply to @wiccan2@thelemmy.club.

I edited the comment. It ended with a period before, I assume your client thought it was a part of the link. Does it work now?

https://chipass.org/

At the very least you're misguided or don't know what you're talking about. Passkeys are not vendor locked in and of themselves.

You can make the same argument against password managers because most iPhone users that use them, use Apple's one.

Not really, Vaultwarden/bitwa4den offer passkey support. When I log into a service a popup shows on my extension, I click it and I'm in. It's not gonna lead to device locking if you don't want to...

Passkeys provide a secure way to authenticate while also being convenient. With the tradeoffs you mentioned.

I don’t like the push for only allowing some vendors to issue keys and to not allowing exporting and backups. And password should still be an option.

Password can also very easily be stolen during phishing, while passkeys are phishing resistant.

And while a hardware passkeys can be stole and used, those who steal them will still need the pin to use them, and the two major hardware passkeys options now (Yubico and Token2) both have some pin brute force protection in their firmware to slow someone down long enough for an account to be secured another way.

As for passkeys on phones, they require the pin or biometric used to unlock the phones to be used.

That would be quite nice to see.