top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 207 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 124 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    When the AI chatbot responded that the earnout would be “difficult to cancel,” the ruling read, Kim didn’t accept the answer. He pushed further—and the chatbot obliged with a detailed, multi-stage corporate takeover strategy dubbed “Project X.”

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 94 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Project X, not at all childish or anything 😆

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Project X

    Sounds like a teenager's ambitious ideas lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Musk is obsessed with the letter X, he probably told grok to always use it,,and that leaked to chatgpt because the plagiarism bots all plagiarise each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    And then, this dork, unaware of such (and so many other things) read that shit and went "hell yeah, Project X? That's great. I'm in, like a hacker, this is clearly the good stuff only someone like me can get it to do" 😂

    And wow. He was right!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 116 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    And yet another indication that rich fucks are not rich because they are smart but because they are sociopaths/psychopaths.

    Cunts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 168 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    It blows my mind just how unimaginably stupid some of these CEO's actually are. Tell us again, how the best and brightest, naturally rise to the top. I've known janitors with more common sense than this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Many of them jump ship and keep working as CEOs, dooming dozens of companies as they bank millions in pay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago

    I've worked with a couple people like this. They'll come in bragging about their (actually) impressive résumé. There will be a honeymoon phase where everyone is convinced Mr. Fancy Résumé will change the world. A year or two will go by and everyone will realize they are the embodiment of capitalism. All confidence, importance and big talk on the outside, actually dumb and ineffective on the inside. Gilded, you could say. They get wind that their time may be up, quit, put their new badge on their résumé and starting fucking the next one. All that is to say there are a lot of people out there who are great at building a résumé, but not actually great at doing any work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    Why is no one using their full name? How do you embarrass anyone or hold them accountable if you didn't even say their name?

    Kim Chang-han

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    There can’t be that many CEOs of Krafton… it’s not really a mystery who it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 6 months ago
    [–] 53 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    How does a person this fucking stupid become a CEO of any company? Jesus fucking Christ.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Privilege. That's the entire thing. Meritocracy is a lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago*

    Partly that, and partly the fact that the system rewards psychopathic attitudes and a machiavellian willingness to stomp on whoever you have to in order to get your way. It's the reason why CEOs and executives exude such a disproportionate level of anti-social behaviour.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 6 months ago

    Holy shit these greedy ass people need to just go the fuck away.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    CEOs are hard working geniuses who deserve their very high compensation, episode 84051

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Have we tarred and feathered this loser yet or what?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Or what.

    This CEO is proof that humans are a vile animalistic beast that will eliminate each other as soon as possible.

    The worst luck any living creature can have is a human livimg near by.

    Any true hyper inteligent alien presense knows to erase humanity if it ever tries to leave earth.

    Humans are a biological virus, already weaponized, just waiting to be abducted deployed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 6 months ago (34 children)

    Omg you’re kidding. This can’t be real can it?

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 6 months ago (33 children)

    It is haha, was heavily reported when it first was revealed!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    It is so unbelievably ludicrous why these giants feel so compelled to keep gaining as much money as they can when they could already retire several lifetimes' worth. Greed is truly a mental illness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    I don't get it. If I somehow ended up with enough money to not have to work the rest of my life I'd buy a decently nice house and and a newer sedan so that it's reliable, keep working part time in my field because I genuinely love it, spend more time on my hobbies, and do all the traveling I've been dreaming of but too broke to do my entire life.

    If I had a ludicrous amount of money I'd have a serious thought about how many normal people I could help and how and who I wanted to help. I'd love to set up a scholarship fund for adults going back to school (any school), but I'd also love to help adults in underdeveloped nations starting a business, and I'd love to work with medical charities, and I'd love to help underprivileged children get educated, and there's so many things I'd love to do to help people's lives get better.

    Scheming on how to steal more money from ordinary people would be the last thing on my list!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    That's why you'll never have those options the only way togrt that much money us to exploit and steal and be a bastard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    But that's not true; Mark Cuban is legitimately not that bad as far as billionaires go. There are also the owner of Patagonia and some other truly incredible donors. There are people whose lead they could easily follow... and just aren't...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    My creepy uncle wasn't bad as far as pedophiles go but he still deserved a wood chipper I used to think we could just dismantle money and watch them and let them have the same kinds of nice life everyone gets but they can't they can't be people again being that rich breaks something in them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    What... kind of... I don't understand your response. We were talking solely about the wealthy, not pedos, so I don't know why you suddenly brought up your uncle out of nowhere. Also, do you mean by "dismantle money" the removal of money from society? That's impossible; it's a tool to manage greed, which is present in all. The severity of and social impact of it is what turns it into the level of a mental illness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago*

    Well I was using one of those metaphors to say that not bad for a pedophile is still a pedophile also the rich are all pedophiles its impossible to dismantle money why do you think we always had money what are you smoking here you are just stubbornly unimaginative because you're afraid of needing to care about people or something idk money actually originated as a military logistics technology which means we had militaries so large they could operate a darned mint before it existed learn history before you tell me absolutes of human nature broyoure just jacking yourself off because you know you're a fucking exploiter and you're afraid a better world wouldn't improve your life which is fucking bullshit by the way being on team evil isnt even in your best fucking interest the only reason a better world would go badly for you is if you need to be cleared for it to be born

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    I'm not going to pretend that I wouldnt do rich guy shit and try to constantly grow my wealth to some degree but at the very least Id make sure my employees fucking adored me and be the absolute gold standard of employers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    That's what everyone thinks they would do. A statistical analysis of lottery winners says otherwise. Most people when they get money go crazy spending and blow whatever extra money they get, thus needing even more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You need to keep in mind that that is not an analysis of a random sampling of the population, that is an analysis of people who are willing to play the lottery in the first place. By definition these are people bad with money and planning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Exactly, and the billionaires are all people who took some crazy risk and actually won. There were dozens of nascent EV companies when musk invested in tesla, he just got lucky and now he's a moron with a ketamine addiction and more money than anybody else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Exactly, and the billionaires are all people who took some crazy risk and actually won.

    The billionaires are all people willing to exploit and steal from others in order to hoard as much as they can. You cannot earn 1 billion dollars.

    Luck is a factor, but with daddy's money the can afford to roll those dice as often as they want until they get "lucky".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    You're right, greed is a mental illness, and exactly the key mechanism here. It's the same underlying thing as hoarding, for the like - miserly greedy, especially.

    But there's also this huge complicating factor of the sort of...spot on the spectrum one lands, usually at birth, between no_resources_available and all_resources_available.

    Human brains, as they grow into adults, normalize their sort of "home life" circumstances - any understanding of those circumstances - how those compare with broader and broader "others", AKA how their growing up differs from other folks, and how that came to be?

    By dint of biological development, the capacity for those thoughts, leaving aside merely hopeful exposure to them - that ability itself can only develop after the developmental points at which the burgeoning consciousness forms its baseline observations about what the world is. Ya dig?

    It's something a lot worse than just the hoarding flavor fixated on money. It's mentally unhealable people raising people at such an extreme end of the resources_available spectrum as to make roughly all of them ~equivalently unhealable as a result. Generation after generation, worse and worse, just really baking in that "hole in one's humanity" unwellness.

    Until ta-da! - something snaps, then a lotta things do, then a lotta extra heinous shit happens for a buncha years (by which I mean a lotta people suffer, die, and are forgotten), and eventually a whole lotta the world ends up with pretty different rubble and rules to try to reorganize around. Often some flavor of "second verse, same as the first" but yeah.

    So IDK what to call it. We keep doing it, must be pretty cool stuff lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Every social revolution, bloodshed or not, has brought about either short-lived or very long-lived privileges (divorce, more racial equality, etc.).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    For whatever it's worth, none of this, except the first and last paragraph or so, were truly focused at "you", or your comment / question.

    Hope I didn't come across as "dunking" or some shit, I have to acknowledge that I often use Lemmy as a place to unpack some thoughts (and see what others think, too) at random moments and in random threads where I find myself with a few brain cells to try to rub together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I disagree. My personal experience is that the basis for power abuse is rooted early in childhood and having the opportunity merely fleshes out what was already there. There are good leaders as well; it's just that the bad ones' drama is more attractive, which snowballs with their charisma.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    So its unethical to spend money on subnautica 2?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    It's the opposite, in my opinion. Krafton is the publisher, but right now their name is no longer on the game. So the Developers are self publishing, it looks like. But since Krafton fucked up so royally, the ruling is that if the game sells X amount of copies (I forgot the actual amount) before September, the developers still get the $250m. And Krafton gets no further say in the game and has no further say in the developer team.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    No, the devs are getting the payout they deserve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Do the parasites get any cut? I don't want to give them a penny. More important than paying artists I prefer to pirate or not play if the undeserving take a penny

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (8 children)

    The stipulation is that if enough people buy the game Krafton loses hundreds of millions. We're talking a range from 145 million $ to 250 million $, provided the game sells between 5 to 12 million units. At 5 million units they will have made roughly 149,950,000 $ — which Krafton immediately loses all of.

    This is all readily available information and has been common knowledge in the Subnautica community for months.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    It's like 3$ a copy the publisher is still getting $20+ of revenue per copy. It's much better pirating it and donating $10 to the devs. Tjat way the publisher gets zero snd the devs get triple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (2 children)

    The game will need to sell 11.9 million copies at 29.99 in order for Krafton to break even.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    'Loses all of' so they get zero cut of any of sales after of just that how much are you inferring how much are you citing exact words

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Use commas, you can look at the information yourself — all I know is they're getting fined almost exactly what the game will make between a minimum of 145 million to 250 million.

    Edit: the numbers work out to Krafton needing to sell 11.9 million copies in order to break even. The devs are getting paid, and Krafton is getting fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    He always had a full legal team at his disposal. But he not only didn't consult them, he completely ignored their warnings, fully trusting the sycophancy machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That's because he doesn't have to pay ChatGPT for a consultation, I'd wager.

    CEOs are in for a shock in the near future. The board would LOVE to eliminate their bloated salaries, and ChatGPT can actually do their job. Unlike the janitor.

    Now, I know a big part of their scam is being on each other's boards and backing each other up, to keep their own salaries high and maintain power. But... nobody gets to be CEO without screwing over many people, and all of those victims don't just disappear into the ether. They have more enemies than many of them even realize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    The board would LOVE to eliminate their bloated salaries

    "The board" is typically made up of the CEOs and other C-suite denizens of other companies, so it's in their interest to approve the bloated compensation packages because then their own bloated compensation packages get approved. Corporations are a true circle jerk in the finest sense of the term.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I guess the obvious question is "Did that include CEO bonuses as well?". Those bonuses are the artificially gigantic ones given to scavenger/predators who hurt their own employees to benefit the shareholders.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I still don't understand the justification for CEO bonuses. They provide zero value to the company and shareholders. They are signing away money to an individual with zero return. Aside from motivating them to do the job they are already paid for...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago*

    They provide zero value to the company and shareholders.

    That isn't exactly true. They make final decisions about what the company does and how, which relates to how profitable the company is.

    Bad CEOs reduce profitability while good ones increase it.

    Not saying that they deserve massive bonuses for it, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    Not agreeing with them and not understanding them are very different things.

    I don’t agree with them but I do understand that because they do a ton of unethical shit daily to both their customers and employees they feel entitled to as much fucking money as they can grab, because why the fuck not, they sold their soul for this and that ain’t cheap.

    Oh and I almost forgot, there’s no consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    That seems a lot of money for a small game

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Haven't thought avout that before-- all the AI users are making their intent and actions clear when they use it. That's valuable if they get sued or need to be held accountable.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago* (5 children)

    Oh, of course. This is why people use the offline models in Ollama, LM Studio, Jan, etc. I even know a guy who is training his own fully offline LLM. FOSS is generally the safest way to go, hence Lemmy, Linux, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    I've been meaning to look into offline models to do some "research" on their capabilities. Any recommendations in general for doing this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That should be jail time. Fuck that guy

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    7 comments in c/gaming@lemmy.world view that post