all 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 41 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You have discovered homonyms

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    This bothers me. I looked it up and it's right, but I want it to be wrong for words that have the same root meaning. It's not like skate (the fish) and skate (the activity). You're an alcoholic because your blood is alcoholic. They're so closely related.

    Does this mean every second definition of a word in the dictionary is also a homonym? How different does it need to be?

    I hate English.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Being an alcoholic is a negative trait; a Martini cannot beat his wife in drunken rage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Wine is an alcoholic beverage. Vodka is an alcoholic's beverage.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    In Wisconsin “alcoholic” is only an adjective.

    We don’t have alcoholics in the other sense here, just “professionals”.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    You would think that a state with such a high rate of heavy drinking coupled with pretty lenient DUI penalties would be a very dangerous place to drive, and yet Wisconsin ranks 34th (out of 50) for drunk driving deaths per capita.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Context matters. Go figure

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    When a person is an ass, the word "ass" is a negative stigma. When an animal is an ass, it's just a donkey.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    If you drink enough vodka, your blood becomes alcoholic.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    "Damn it, Beer, you're alcoholic!"

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    In portuguese, we have a different word for alcoholic person (alcoolatra), which helps avoid this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    If the adjective means, "has or pertaining to containing alcohol," then it's simply the chronic condition of a human choosing to be that way that draws the stigma.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Dammit DaMonsterKnees, you have Lupis.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    One is a noun, the other an adjective, and as such they carry different meanings. For example, someone could eat a tart (baked good) that is not tart (sour).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    It's also nearly impossible to defend alcohol consumption without sounding like an alcoholic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'll take a stab at it.

    It's a safe drinking supply. That's a big part of why humans drank it for thousands of years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 months ago

    Sure before modern civilized times when the water supply was filthy with human waste, that's why everyone had to drink alcohol. Because they polluted their own water supply with shit. Glad science figured things out and got us back to drinking water again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    The idea that people drank beer because it was safer than water is a myth. They drank for the exact same reason we do today…you get a buzz. A side benefit was that beer had calories in a drinkable form. The safety of the drink, as in not full of harmful microbes, was an indirect but not primary benefit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    No, on the beverage and food, it is a stigma, too.

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)