As Canada prepares to accept more Chinese-made electric vehicles into the country, a U.S. senator is warning that although Canada-U.S. ties are strained, Canadian officials should be cautious when making agreements with China's government.

"I understand that Canada is looking elsewhere and trying to diversify," Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin said.

...

"Jjust because we [the U.S.] have become more difficult doesn't mean the Chinese are always the straightest shooters when it comes to national security," Slotkin [said].

The Michigan senator, also a former CIA officer, explained her concerns with a Chinese-made EV sending back 3D video and geolocation data, which could be "hacked back to Beijing."

...

"They're national security issues, not just economic security issues," Slotkin said. She and a Republican senator from Ohio have also introduced a bill banning the import, sale and operation of vehicles manufactured in China.

Slotkin's security concerns echo those made by other Canadian officials — including Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Ontario Premier Doug Ford — and some Canadian experts.

...

Over the last decade, China has passed a series of national security and intelligence laws that oblige Chinese companies to co-operate with the government when asked. A similar law in the U.S., called the Cloud Act, compels American technology companies to share data gathered in foreign countries with the government if asked.

...

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 6 months ago

We need to be wary of China but I don't really care to hear about it from the US.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    US: "Hey Canada, don't let China fuck you raw. That's our job!".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    We don’t give a fuck what the US “thinks”.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] [S] -18 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Yeah, but whatever the US thinks, China for sure isn't a better partner, probably still even worse.

    💩 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    yea, but at least we got the pacific ocean between us and China

    We're stuck on the same rock as the yanks, who until recently at least seemed ok

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    At least we know where we stand with China.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] [S] -8 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Oh, yeah, we do know where we stand. The Chinese envoy to Canada has already 'warned' Canada to send MPs to Taiwan, just to name an example. The coercion and bullying has already begun. China is a dictatorship and doesn't care about agreements. It's at least as unreliable as the U.S.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    We’ve gotten those warnings before. The question is do they stick to their trade deals when we disagree on foreign policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    The question is do they stick to their trade deals when we disagree on foreign policy.

    No, they don't. As seen literally everywhere in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You're talking about the US right now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Thank you? This is the first time I've been called a troll. The US is infamous for economic coercion throughout the world, from even before the days of economic hitmen continuing into the present. Even moreso than China. I take it you didn't mean the US, and that is why you reacted the way you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Would you accept the US sending members of congress to meet with Danielle Smith and encourage Alberta separatists?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Aren't they already doing that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    The US definitely is! Maybe not sending members of Congress as far as I know, but fully supporting separatists. That's why I asked OP if they accept it, since they seem to be up in arms about China pulling a stink about Canada doing the same with Taiwan.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    China might end up being as bad as the US but we won't know until we try.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Well but here is the thing, we kind of already know a lot that China is bad. Yeah, USA is bad,blah, everybody knows that, but China, yeah, is bad too. Fuck China, Russia, and the USA.

    Having said that, we will have to trade with them but ffs, you need to walk on your toes and check every step taken.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    They do more business with China than we do, she needs to give her head a shake. We are a sovereign nation, we don't need lectures from Americans on how we conduct ourselves on the world stage, though i think they could use one.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    i dont give a wooden nickel what elissa slotkin thinks

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)