post
It would be interesting to know the token cost for all of this. I think they are getting lots free as advertising for Anthropic, would it be feasible otherwise?
They are supporting some projects with free tokens. Their own people are also helping to find and patch bugs. The latter is probably more to help improve the model and harness than PR. I don't think they have to worry about advertising anymore. Mind that there certainly would be a major outcry if something important got hacked with help by their service. They might even have to pay damages. But I wouldn't put it past them that they are being responsible as a matter of principle.
The most fascinating revelation is that there are still a few competent engineers employed by the Mozilla Foundation. I thought they were mainly C-level and PR people at this point, squandering donations as fast as Google would let them.
I don't care about your usage of the slopmachine.
As a user of your products, I wish you'd stop. There are scant few browsers for me to leave to.
Hardening with AI, lmao
But I mean why? Used in this way, AI systems are just another static analysis tool.
Sure, a computationally inefficient one, but if you can get the signal/noise region high enough, anything that helps you find bugs seems fair game to me.
One has to review their work, and take any fix offered by the slopmachine with a lot of care, of course.
And Anthropic is a bad company, but we are talking about detecting security vulnerabilities in Firefox by wasting Anthropic money. That seems like win-win.
The only downside (and I admit it's big) is that Anthropic gets some publicity out of this.
Call me new fashion, but bug testing is something I would want to skip any day, if AI could find JUST 20% of my problems. And then I will fix them.


all 41 comments