top 90 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

A 32-hour, 4-day work week can be more productive than a traditional 40-hour, 5-day schedule, particularly for roles that require cognitive engagement beyond routine production line tasks.

There are studies that prove this. It also reduces sick days. Does anyone care? No, let's ignore science because it feels like it's more productive to force productivity.

People like simple solutions more than listening to science.

More cops, less crime.

More work, more productivity.

More billionaires, better economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago

    Yeah one of the biggest learnings for me over my career is that people are hard-wired for stories. It doesn't matter how good an engineer/scientist you are, how well explained or robust the logic/study is, etc. People only respond to how things make them feel - we are emotional beings with the ability to rationalize, not the other way around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    I was going to mention the same thing. The recent AI craze and productivity studies are another similar thing. Same with return-to-office. Our rulers (the owner class) put power and cruelty over rationality.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 79 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Remember kids, if you see someone shoplifting at the supermarket, no you didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Most of the people who work there don't even care if you're shoplifting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Except for that one overzealous middle-manager who will immediately get irate as if you had insulted them personally, as they demand you go back to the register so an underpiad cashier can embarrassingly ring up every item so they know exactly how much you stole, and finish by entering your face into a 3rd party database that will flag you every time you walk in any other store that also utilizes this database.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 113 points 6 months ago

    its not about the wellbeing of our society, its about being in control. by force

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    As a person whose home was recently burgled: I spoke with 4 different police officers/detectives in the investigation. I agree that what we need is a less desperate society, not more policing.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Let me guess... They're investigating but have no interest in doing actual police work once the case is filed.

    Bad cop, no doughnut.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    The first two responded to the initial call, the second two were from the forensic ID team, checking for prints and seeing if there was anything likely to give a good DNA signal. I don't know what else I could expect from them. I know they worked with the power company to figure out what time my power was cut, and went to my neighbours to see if they had any video from that time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (4 children)

    Can I ask what they took? It's none of my business, but I guess I'm morbidly curious about what they were desperate to have, and why burglary was a better option than, say, shoplifting or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Mostly jewellery eg my wife's engagement ring, also weirdly a Lego set

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Why not both? Other people's desperation is not an excuse to rob you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    It's more effective on a finite budget. Just like focusing on a rehabilitation is better than focusing on punishment in prisons. The Norwegian method spends way more per person but the ones that go through the system are much less likely to come back. This means that per person Norway spends way less than a lot of other countries.

    Norway spends 3x more per prisoner than the US but spend half as much on prisons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Explanations aren't excuses. Especially because the things that drive individuals are systems; we can strive to hold individuals accountable for their actions whilst also recognise the systemic oppression that makes it harder to make good choices

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    If poors stop doing crime and cops can't arrest the poors then who will give profit prisons free labor??

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago*

    Related: it's been long known that giving unemployed people money is good for the economy.

    "I'm a supporting member of society because I work 40h/week, and you aren't" simply isn't true.

    I don't have the scientific paper to support this but I've known it since the 1990s.

    Economists know it too. It doesn't even have anything to do with "socialism".

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago

    Homeless people cost tax payers between 30-50 thousand dollars a year. Housing the homeless is likely fiscally conservative.

    This means the incentive structure in our society is wrong. People who lack the creativity to solve novel problems resort to psychopathy to to be productive in the economy. Military industrial complex, private prisons, judge judy.

  • source
  • [–] 51 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    The purpose of cops is not to reduce crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago

    This is psychologically unsatisfying for too many people. At the core of capitalist propaganda is the idea the the rich and the poor both deserve what they have. In the US, we further buttress this ideal with something called "prosperity gospel".

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago

    Cops are mainly to suppress anybody who doesn't go along with the will of the powerful.

    They don't exist to reduce harm to the many, they exist to protect the assets of the Owner class, which is why in Law property "crime" is usually more severely punished than anything but murder and why cops are vastly more speedy at investigating and prosecuting "crimes" committed against the Owner class or their Assets than they are when it's the riff-raff that suffers.

    They're minions to a handful of people, not servants of the public.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago
    [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    Yeah but that doesn't serve the prison industrial slavery complex

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Source?

    This just confirms my preexisting biases a little too much.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    They know. But it's better for them for crime to be up and police to be fat, so they can run on being hard on crime, and police works for the rich instead of the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    AgE oF sCIence aND prOgREss

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    But does it protect capital?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    No no no, that's socialism! Which people have learned is bad... Because, empathy is toxic!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Ahh but you see, blaming the poor for all the problems is great they can't effectively fight back and if they do, it's super easy to fearmonger about the riots of 'those people'

    Gotta keep em separated...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Show me the science Jerry!

    SHOW ME THE SCIENCE!!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago*

    Yeah, well, science also says Twitter is an information black hole, and few that need to see this will see it.

    I know it’s microblog memes, but still. It’s surprising to me how much scientist believers post about the state of the world… on Twitter. It’d be like going into a Nazi bar in Berlin to warn about the Holocaust, or to criticize Catholicism in the Vatican, and thinking you’re somehow in an open forum.

    …At least it isn’t a blue checkmart Tweeter, though.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    The pedophile class wants everything

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Love the vibe in this comment section 🤙🏻

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Sane people do stuff for a reason. Remove the reason, remove the action they would take.

    Like for example remove pay and any sane person will stop working.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Basic needs, I.E food, water, shelter, and healthcare should be seen as rights, but past that is wants, and people will work for what they want.

    In our current system we provide all of those needs, and fund it with by taxes for the people in prison, but not the innocent and poor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Do you think that anybody who does volunteer work is insane?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Pay doesn't have to be monetary. Would you do volunteer work for building a billionaires next house? Volunteer at Amazon to pack boxes? The pay for volunteering is a satisfaction that you are doing the "right thing" and helping people/communities in need.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    People have been told all their lives that money can't buy happiness and now science is proving that it very much can so I imagine there is a bit of cognitive dissonance.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    There is a difference between “having enough money prevents people from turning to crime to survive and meet their basic needs” and “having more money allows you to buy more happiness, even if your basic needs have long since been met.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago

    I am a new user, please welcome me, thank you

  • source
  • [+] -9 points 6 months ago (8 children)
  • [+] -37 points 6 months ago (20 children)

    If only it were that simple.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    There is some nuance yes. But it's also easy to see that it's cheaper to deal with a problem early than it is to deal with the consequences after the fact, especially if that second step is done poorly.

    It's not one or the other, since giving money won't stop all crime or violence. Rather its about finding the right balance between the different places that the money can go. Right now, in many places around the world, we might be putting too much money into policing, and that money could be better spent on other programs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Yes I agree with what you're saying but the tweet ignores that you're likely already doing both giving money to cops and giving money to poor people so the nuance of effectiveness of where to allocate the extra funds is not as simple as the tweet puts. I can think of a ton of times where increasing welfare does not impact crime statistics and increasing cop spending does and vice versa. I really do wish it was as simple as the tweet makes it out to be because throwing money at a problem is actually pretty easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago (12 children)

    It is, and I have no idea what you're talking about.

    When people have food on the table and roof over their beds, they don't need to do crime.

    Fund mental health care for all, and viola, we are only left with wage theft and police brutality as the most common crimes, which are done by rich and powerful people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    I can tell you have no idea what im talking about you're literally the person in the tweet who thinks its a simple issue that is easily solved by giving people food and housing. I dont know what planet you live on but people have food and housing and still commit crime. Giving people a good quality of life reduces crime but there are other factors at play.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I expect your mind is made up and that you already realize this, but it's not that this idea would solve all crime, it's that it would help. It's about which policies do the most good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    You dont think I understand that this helps? I know this helps. This tweet is acting like they've found an absolute fact and no one in government is listening but that doesnt track at all with reality and "memes" like this erode public trust in government. The reality is every single leftwing government around the world knows this and even right wing ones at this point. They have all implemented some form of policy based on this understanding but it's not a silver bullet and government is a balancing act and at some point you still need other approaches like police.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I can tell you have no idea what im talking about

    Gaslighting is abuse. It's why centrists do it all the fucking time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You dont even vote so spare me the political bait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    You dont even vote

    Libel. I vote every chance I get.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You are exactly the suit that is being lamented in the meme. Your narrow minded view of the world was programmed into you and you've not shed it yet.

    Crimes of desperation don't happen when people aren't desperate. Most petty thefts are crimes of desperation. Some of jealousy.

    You're just unthinking and uncaring as a result of your conditioning. I hope better for you.

    You're getting robbed blind by suits while seeing desperate people trying to survive as the problem inside a system designed to crush them under a jackboot.

    It doesn't have to be this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Why are you saying crimes of desperation when we are talking about general crime. Most of the people committing crime have food and a place to live. It's not all homeless starving people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago

    I'll agree with you.

    Like is someone stealing a ps5 to hawk it for food or pay rent? Sometimes but definitely not always.

    It's kind of pathetic how everyone is acting like this is a simple issue that you fix basic social safety nets and there won't be crime. Just as pathetic as right wing takes on immigration or basically everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)