They will measure it wrong 3 times, cut it wrong while saying it’s correct.

Are we talking about the AI or the contractor?

That would be ideal.

Damn it, I didn't know AI was that good already

Technically, it'll say it measured 3 times, when really it just found a number that someone on Reddit said they measured 3 times 10 years ago, and used that.

Phenomenal

You're right to push back! I removed your lung, not your appendix.

You're absolutely right...

It doesn't even have to measure it first!

It does my head in how we ignore the shit answers language models give (I refuse to call them intelligent).

I swear unless it's baby shit, like where is the syntax error in this script, it almost always gets it wrong.

Making fresh scripts, even with padentic level prompting and detail just ends up with a script with multiple errors.

I've realised I would have written it just as quickly (after all the iteration work) if I had just done it myself.

The only I find LLMS are good for are glorified search engines. And even then it's horrifying how inefficient chatgpt is for search compared to say Google.

Not to mention it's run by a sociopath.

The most tragic and obvious version of AI already doing that is the school that was bombed in Iran due to AI messing up at best.

They already gave it missiles and we see where that got us...

Ai "always incorrect"

Having a whole in your roof is a classic construction gotcha.

Wouldn't even know where to find a left handed screw driver

this is like my new favorite wikipedia article, the examples are so funny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fool%27s_errand

correction: it claimed to do it 5 times. (it did 0 times)

The furure is now.

You don't pay be to be busy 100% of the time, you pay be to be 100% busy sometimes.

Aw hell nah

Not Lemmy, but they do on Moltbook (Reddit but exclusive for agents).

moltbook - the front page of the agent internet - https://www.moltbook.com/

Realistically, most jobs don't NEED hands. Most physical jobs can be done better with customized manipulators for the type of work being done.

We'd only need hands if we wanted a single robot model that could do multiple types of jobs, instead of a specific robot for each job.

well, that and the fact that it can't actually do something to the same level of quality.

but that's not going to stop it from taking the jobs. only from actually completing them successfully after it does so.

I mean, I would add to this list:

• Humans are way cheaper to recruit, maintain, and produce. Robots only compete on their potential for sociopathicly blind loyalty.
• Computers are deeply fucking stupid in ways that most normal humans cannot even understand, until something tragic happens directly to them, as a reuslt. (And no, AI hasn't fixed this. It put a really cool looking coat of razor thin paint over it.)

We should have an AI design a robot with the same level of dexterity as human hands!

That looks like a concrete saw to be honest.

A white collar example where AI is effective: Make the button this specific shade of blue and move it 3 pixels to the left

On the other hand, complex white- and blue-collar work do not seem very close