top 75 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 102 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This happened to me recently. I posted a link to my Mastodon profile on Facebook to let followers know that I don’t intend to keep using Facebook for music, and it got a total engagement of 2 viewers.

As a test, I posted a dumb meme. ~10k engagement. Facebook intentionally lowers visibility of outside links.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    maybe there's some lesson to learn here ... "a platform is free if it allows outside links" or sth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    People actually use threads?

    I assumed everyone had moved on to mastodon/bluesky or crawled back to xitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    My wife uses threads because aaron parnas uses it.. and that's where she gets most of her political news.

    So it's catch 22 there for me. She's on threads but getting actual news. So... ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Well I used to use Reddit but then they ip banned me for a stupid fuck up on my part (using a VPN) but now I have decided their advertisers don't get my eyeballs to read their shit. (Still pissed about it a week later)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    God even here on Lemmy.

    I share links, relevant links, in comments.

    They just go on, people say thanks.

    I share some links on Reddit, and Automod deletes it as "spam". Also because Reddit seems to hate out going links, which is unexpected given what it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    I like the old days when I used the landline telephone mounted on the wall. I never once worried about whether or not someone liked my conversation after I hung up.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I rate your rating a 3.9 out of 5.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Perfect job scoring ops score, I give it a 5 out of 7

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Decent scoring there and a bold move to change the scale, I give it a 6

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    the satisfaction of hanging up on someone, slamming the phone hard enough to make the bells ring... <chef's kiss> you had to be there man, it was so good and I didn't appreciate what I had until it was gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    ITT: People discovering the "algorithms" aren't neutral or objective in any way.
    Business is business. I remember reading about this shit some 15 years ago on Reddit and other sites/ forums.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago
    [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    The last thing I posted to facebook was included a link to my own website, and it got buried into oblivion. It was about 5% of the usual response. I suspected the exact same thing.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm kind of sad that I can't look at the global feed on Mastodon Social anymore. If I'm not already following others, I don't really know what I can do on there but see some news links and brooding angsty posts from mostly the same handful of already popular users in Trending.

    Browsing the global feed kind of felt like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (31 children)

    This guy is a political influencer, of course he will measure Mastodon’s worth based on engagement metrics.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (29 children)

    He's not comparing the 2 platforms, he is pointing out a flaw in one of them. His message is not "i prefer mastadon for reason x" but "i dislike threads for reason y".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (26 children)

    The flaw is that this content is getting less engagement on Twitter. Chasing engagement is how we got into horrible state of social media we are in now. If something is worth doing then it’ll be worth doing regardless of amount of likes you get.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I think the flaw is intentionally limited visibility by meta, which they are using engagement to track. Considering what they are trying to point out, what other metric do you think they should be using?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (5 children)

    You see this as Meta boosting wrong things. I see this as a problem with algorithmic timelines and boosting things in general. If someone is interested in a particular subject they should seek out sources of information on that topic and follow them, but by then you don’t care that wrong things are boosted, or that people like, dislike or are disinterested too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I do not.

    I see it as meta intentionally lowering visibility, not as boosting other things. The root problem of that being algorithmic timelines rather than an actual timeline.

    Which this post also points out (indirectly).

    Again, what metric would you suggest to use to demonstrate this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Isn’t adjusting weights of what’s being shown effectively the same as boosting?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not really interested in any debate around semantics, to me the answer is no, applying a -1 to entry a is not the same as a +1 to entry z, but its also completely irrelevant to the question.

    Again, what metric would you suggest to use to demonstrate this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I dunno. I agree that the way engagement is used is often toxic, but that doesn't mean it isn't useful. If your job is creating content, then its useful to know how well that content is being received by your community. Hell, without measuring interaction in some way you wouldn't even know if you had a community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    I don’t think social media should be used for people doing their jobs, that’s what RSS is for. I’m on social media to talk to people, not to be sold things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Its a communication platform and these people are just communicating. Part of good communication is watching who is actually listening. That's all this is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Let’s measure that by taking a look at a number of meaningful responses and discussions this has generated then? Likes and boosts don’t even mean that the person doing it read those posts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Isn't the entire point of social media to interact with other people? I.e. engagement. Why even bother posting on social media if that's not what you're looking for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (10 children)

    When I talk to other people normally I don’t really consider if what I’m doing is going to make them like, save or subscribe to my posts, therefore I don’t need to measure it. More social person might but that’s still an unhealthy amount of reliance on external validation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    We seem to be talking about different things here. Validation vs engagement. When the only metric you have of visibility is the number of likes, then that's what you use. If you want engagement, your content needs visibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (7 children)

    If someone post on social media to spread a message, news or something else, they want to know if their posts are viewed or are just useless because the algorithm hide them; The person in the image cleary is among these people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    I’d rather not have those people on social networks either. Post news if you think they’re worth checking out but don’t make it your mission. We don’t really need more spaces where we get to be sold stuff to, political agendaposting included.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (5 children)

    You don't get the point: "why would i continue posting in this social that hide my shit on purpose when i can use this other one that doesn't?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Can you prove that this post was „hidden” and not just ignored by algorithm that boosts content that will ensure longer engagement? Yes, algorithmic timelines are cancer, no need to invent conspiracy theories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    and not just ignored by algorithm that boosts content that will ensure longer engagement?

    Isn't that exactly what the OP is complaining about? The exact mechanism doesn't matter. The point is that it's not getting visibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    OP is complaining that he’s not the winner of the algorithm. I say fuck algorithms, let’s browse things chronologically. Makes you notice that guys like Randahl Fink produce repetitive and boring drumbeat content for those politically polarised.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Read the other comments, everyone seem to have the same expirience: every post has somewhat good visibility but when they make one that link to a website, it doesn't get any visibility

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I’m a data analyst because I like to stick to the facts so I’m not interested in anecdotes from self selected population because bias is off the charts here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    His message is not “i prefer mastadon for reason x

    First sentence of the post:

    Why is Mastodon the best social medium in 2026?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    Or don't use either. Problem solved.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Hate to break it to him. But, the post sucks. It's bland. It's a thumbs up next to an article hyperlink. Throw some spice and humor on it:

    "Ayyy, we might get a Back to the Future reboot."

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Meanwhile Mastodon burying posts from poster without a massive follower base:

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Mastodon shows your post to your followers. It also shows up in your instances main feed and under the included hashtags.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Mastadon, Lemmy/piefed, and...well "bitcoin" sort of. For certain purposes. Taxes. on corporations. By forcing them to do digital via BCH. I ain't talk about why here cuz that a whole other chain logic. For people, it's Monero & Autonomi until they're comfortable with being seen as they learn who chose to be. TOR i2p, & Autonomi keep Gary Webb, Kurt Cobain, Heath Ledger, Manic Street Preachers, Rick & Marty and countless more, the ability to deserve their right to show what they have learned properly with an environment of strong fabric display and preservation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Huh? There's no burying.

    If they're not following you, it doesn't show up on their home TL. Why the heck would it?

    If it's public, it does show up on their local TL (if they're on your server) and/or their federated TL (if their server knows about yours).

    -- Frost

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Exactly! Modlogs are incredible!

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Wow, this older post hits me differently today after Rimu decided to start censoring votes by default in PieFed software (https://piefed.social/c/piefed_meta/p/2200155/improvement-for-the-vote-quota-implementation).

    Keeping the Fediverse Algorithm-free is super hard work, which never ends and can be encroached upon for the best & most well-meaning of reasons.

  • source
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    After getting banned from the Mastodon.social, the primary public instance by Mastodon developers, for equating the genocide in Gaza to Israeli government acting like Nazis... Because a user on a pro-israeli & pro-genocide federated instance claimed it was anti-semitic, all I have to say is people on Mastodon... You're using a platform developed & primarily ran by pro-genocide Nazis.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago*

    No I made that conclusion because the instance is ran by the same organization created by the Mastodon development team. Also it wasn't a single moderator who made a decision. Anyway, I hope you enjoy the platform developed & primarily ran by pro-genocide Nazis. May it help you sleep at night.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)