top 64 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 203 points 7 months ago

Here's the original article from Mozilla instead of this third-party AI slop regurgitating it.

  • source
  • [–] 87 points 7 months ago

    Windows forcing their own propriatary software as a means to destroy competing web browsers? Is it 1997 already?

  • source
  • [–] 365 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Holy shit that image... we need to destroy AI I'm sick of this absolute garbage polluting the web

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Yes, I agree. Join us over on fuck_AI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Why would I join a fuck AI sub that every day I login is just gonna be like fuck it I fuck AI that just sounds like a complete mental drain no thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] -12 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    To join the circlejerk? No thanks.

    Every time I come across a post with the biggest "we hate everything" energy, it is one of fuck_AI.

    Even blatant misinformation gets upvoted and shared. As long as it attacks AI.

    Same vibe as the anti-Bieber crowd back in the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 122 points 7 months ago

    Fuck off with this AI bullshit

  • source
  • [–] 100 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

    There's a lot of people on the Mozilla hate train, and they do deserve a bit of ire for some of their more puzzling decisions. All I wanted from Firefox was a configurable browser with sane defaults, that lets me block ads and does all the normal browser things without being a total black box of corporate telemetry and profiling. To a large degree Firefox has been the best mainstream browser for people who can't dance with the devil and use Chrome. In many aspects, it has made better decisions than Chrome.

    With that said, I didn't want Pocket, I didn't want AI, and I'm mildly annoyed that this sort of thing is in the default build. It feels like a windows installer asking you to install 10 additional programs, but the ticked boxes are greyed out. I just want a browser, no crypto wallets, no ai assistants, no built-in mail client, no biometric scanning.

    Firefox has been around long enough to have been both god tier and trash tier at different points. I don't think the AI focus is going to go well for Mozilla. I'd like them to focus on browser stuff.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I had an ad in my Firefox settings for "Solo AI Website Creator". It's a product from Mozilla for using AI to build your website. Note that it's not open source, and you must rely on them to host your website (no export functionality, and recurring fees outside a basic free tier).

    I agree with you, I wish Mozilla would focus solely on their mission instead of trying to build all these side projects people don't want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I meeeean…. I kinda agree with you, but where exactly do you expect funding to come from? “Focus only on the browser. That they make no money off. Also stop accepting money from Google.”

    Like I get it to an extent, it would be nice. But how exactly is “make no money” a viable business plan?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    That's fair. I wouldn't reject money from Google but instead build up an endowment with it for when it eventually disappears. If you can recover your market share (maybe by investing in your browser - the peformance is lagging) then you can also demand more money from Google to set them as default. Finally, Mozilla is a non-profit and I wouldn't be opposed to them just asking for donations, like most non-profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The original article mentions the sabotaging only as historical evidence for a trend of pushing its tech onto people. It is not saying Microsoft is currently doing it specifically to sabotage anyone. Bullshit title.

    The original article also mentions several things as fact that are not, and omits other facts, but that’s a different discussion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    Was the image generated with copilot?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Downvoting for unsolicited AI slop on my feed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I don't think Microslop really needs to sabotage Firefox. Firefox is doing a really good job of shooting their own selves in the foot.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I don't get this argument. Mozilla and Firefox is the best we have. Are they perfect, no, but don't let perfect be the enemy of good. They are still a lot better than the alternatives.

    It's obviously important to hold Mozilla accountable, but I worry that all the negativity makes people just stick with Chrome or Edge because they think it's all the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Its the best we have, given that our standart of "good" is privacy and open-source etc. Otherwise Firefox is just not a great browser. Especially on mobile. And Mozilla keeps making it kinda worse for privacy bit by bit. There isnt really any reason for someone who doesnt care about privacy to usw firefox.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I'll agree that their mobile experience is not great, they don't support tablet layouts for example, but it still has the best support for ad blocking. I consider that essential for the modern internet.

    My big concern is that we're repeating the Internet Explorer issue all over again, where the web is coded for it instead of standards. Now Google has the ability to strong arm the Internet by not adopting standards, pushing their preferences, etc. Web sites are being coded coded to run on better on Blink than Gecko so it gets worse all the time. If we give up on Mozilla the Internet will fall even further into the hands of big tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago

    To be fair, they edited in the Microslop logo and also the Firefox icon, making a crying fox look like a narcissist hugging it's own image, that is not completely out of blue with their recent shitty decisions

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago

    Mozilla are perfectly capable of sabotaging themselves, thank you.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    firefox really shouldnt be our only line of defence for decent browser..

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago

    What's up with the AI slop image for this post?

    Also, Mozilla is destroying Firefox by themselves, they don't need help from m$

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Anti-steering stuff again. Besides that I'll always be a bit annoyed with Mozilla both with their design decisions for FirefoxOS and then how much they bungled it. RokuOS is still highly relevant while FirefoxOS descendents are real niche. Firefox is usually the default on Linux distros. Mozilla should have at least been pushing Linux distros that shipped Firefox on laptops/desktops since FirefoxOS was announced

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Nah, mozilla sabotaged firefox.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Mozilla could have had a foothold but they literally added AI into Firefox, so idk how far they're gonna get.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It defaults to local models only from what I know. You probably are responding from a device that uses embedded models already. If you are against technology how are you responding?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    FR. These features are so easy to disable, when I updated Firefox recently it asked me on next load if I want the features or not... I chose not, no big deal!

    'AI' is this generations Justin Bieber / Skrillex. There's plenty to criticise but it's becoming a bandwagon at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    Ah yes, I'm sure it was microslop who decided to make firefox add an AI the community voted against

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

    Did they also force them to kill MDN, buy pocket, or funnel 99% of the foundation's budget on everything that's not Firefox?

    Edit: fact checked myself and the budget part is completely incorrect. The foundation just leeches on the corporation through yearly royalties.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    What's this about killing MDN?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    In 2020 they fired the entire MDN writing team, slashed the budget, and basically left it in maintainance mode. The same year the foundation decided to drop millions on teaching Africans to code or some shit...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The same year the foundation decided to drop millions on teaching Africans to code or some shit

    this would be a very good use of money, if the money actually reached the target audience

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I've got no issues with helping people in need, but even if it's not an embezzlement scheme, this is extremely bad prioritization unless their priority is publicity.

    MDN is a proven resource that's helped a lot of people learn to code. How many African translators can you hire for a milion a year, let alone like 8? How many more people would learn to code that way?l

    But nah, let's feed money into "partners" that use some experimental teaching methods, while destroying a crucial learning resource because corona made us broke.

    Edit: fact checked myself and the corp killed MDN, and they're paying the foundation to do projects like this through royalties.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Thundermail seems cool at least, as an encrypted email service.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The only thing destroying Firefox is Mozilla themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago
    [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Firefox makes a good fork base anyway

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago
    [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    When Windows lets me make Dolphin the default file manager I'll believe they don't have a right to force people to use whatever product they wish.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    Not fair! Mozilla can self-sabotage without the help of Microslop, thank you very much!

  • source
  • [+] -23 points 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [+] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    antitrust legislation exists

    Well, it did once, but it was taken out back and executed quite a while ago. Now it is just "Weekend at Bernie's" time, see Antitrust is right there points to corpse sitting in a chair with a smile on its face

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments