Whoever made this needs to learn how to form coherent statements.
post
replies:
What about convection? There's been at least some mixing, right? So I'd guess the average age of a nucleus from the core (ignoring fusion) would indeed be less than from the surface, but I would think it's less difference (on average) than the raw math. If there's enough mixing it could be very little difference at all.
older. The core is older. It was there first.
replies:
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
hideshow 1 child comment
They both formed at the same time, none came first.
Due to general relativity and the immense gravity inside the core of the sun it is in fact 39,000 years younger compared to the outside where time flows faster.

all 10 comments