They won't unite out of morality, but preservation.

Unfortunately, there may still be a long way to go, assuming the leadership doesn't deny reality up until the nuke launches start.

The Israel's "anti-jew/antisemitic" rhetoric only works with the west, so it could take a very long time for leaders with bigger balls to just say "that's not gonna work anymore". USA is currently on the path to self isolation.

It's already happening, but it's in usually a slow disentangling of payment systems, software, tech, ... Just cut and run would be very damaging. And like many things in politics it's often two steps forward one step back.

Our EU leaders are sell-outs and still US bootlickers despite their act.
The ghoul VDL is blaming Iran for defending themselves.

Not that easy when you have an insane person with a lot of nukes.

Israel doesn't have veto powers as they're not in the security council. They can only vote 'no'. 

Well, a particularly jarring one is the USA's refusal to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Everyone else, including Israel, has ratified it, except them.

Because they want child labour, and to be able to keep executing children, and bombing schools, apparently.

To the idiots, the trend is that the US and Israel are the only great countries on earth.

Hail Hydra or something

Overfed with low nutrition and high subsidised fructose slop

We'll see how long that lasts with the upcoming fertilizer shortages, rising trucking fuel costs and the loss of immigrant farm workers...

I'm pretty sure that the privileged are well fed around the world.

Approximately 13.5 percent of U.S. households — more than 47 million Americans, including nearly 14 million children — struggle to put food on the table. Here the measure of hunger is “food insecurity” — an ongoing uncertainty of where the next meal will come from. More than 1 in 5 U.S. children are at risk of hunger (1 in 3 among Black and Latino(a) children). To the surprise of many, most Americans (51.4 percent) will live in poverty at some point before age 65.

https://www.bread.org/hunger-explained/hunger-in-the-u-s/

That's not how you spell cuntries

Do you mean Gen X, Millennials, or Xennials when you say last to have analog?

I think it would actually be easier to list what is NOT wrong with the US lol, cos that woulld make for a very short list lol

Oh boy, where to start?

These resolutions are designed to make some countries look bad. Somewhere in the small print there's a point unacceptable for the US and Israel, so they vote against and newspapers world-wide can report on how US and Israel alone blocked the end of famine.

For some reason its always them somehow involved

Israel, Russia and the USA internationally, domestically they have more competition like NK, China, Belarus, some African States and a bit of South America

No single country should have veto power in the first place.

No, it's not. This resolution was adopted with a vote of 186-2-0. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3954949?ln=en&v=pdf

Honestly, the UN has been a farce for a long time because of this exact issue. If a handful of countries have veto power then the whole point of the group was moot from the beginning.

I always thought it rather odd the country that gained its (unofficial) statehood because of a genocide of its own people have actively participated in committing one themselves. All by playing an oppressed victim.

Zios will be responsible for a planetary nuclear holocaust first.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
• https://brilliantmaps.com/israels-nuclear-missiles/

The explanation given in this link is complete hogwash.

Bothsidesing idiocy is idiotic.

There will always be nitpicks whenever the resolution is not completely meaningless and devoid of any actionable steps. If the vote was started again just stating that nations are generally against starvation, then I'm sure the US would vote yes.

But maybe not!

The US has done things far worse than what North Korea has done. Every ten years your "democracy" bombs another country.

Because nothing has changed since then, except for the worse.

Today, I will remind them.

Most "human rights" are for corporations to buy politicians/media under state protection... and stuff like that.

Access to information - Internet access should be made a human right

life, privacy, information