Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, who is a leading Republican candidate for governor, has seized more than 650,000 ballots from last November’s election and is investigating whether they were fraudulently counted.

“This investigation is simple: Physically count the ballots and compare that result with the total votes recorded,” Bianco said at a news conference Friday.

"The unusual probe drew a sharp rebuke from California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, who said in a statement Friday that it is “unprecedented in both scope and scale” and appears “not to be based on facts or evidence.”

“There is no indication, anywhere in the United States, of widespread voter fraud,” Bonta said. “Counts, recounts, hand counts, audits, and court cases all support this.”

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 7 months ago

If you are on the ballot, you should have zero influence on how the ballot is counted.

Otherwise? Death.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    deport his ass back to his racist white trash homeland

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    This is a dress rehearsal for the Midterms. MAGA will attempt to steal ballots in important states in order to "verify" the vote count. Elections are a state responsibility, and any attempt at Federal confiscation must be met with the ultimate resistance. Let's see if they are willing to steal the ballots by violent force.

  • source
  • 45 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 134 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Anything to sow doubts about the election! Tax payers are funding this, of course.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Its really sad that killing cops would not meaningfully fix any of our many many problems, because it would be so easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 101 points 7 months ago

    Normalizing actions like this so when he loses he can seize the ballots and claim what he wants as the election result

  • source
  • [–] 85 points 7 months ago

    Sneak preview of November

  • source
  • [–] 79 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    If you call 911 for BS, you may end up in legal trouble and have to pay a hefty fine for wasting resources.

    Why the hell are these GOP cucks continuing to call every election they lose a fake and waste resources on this?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Because it's not just about their race. It's about all future races. It's about convincing people that the election process can't be trusted.

    The sad thing is...that it's working.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 32 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Is this all because trump brutally raped those girls?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    There needs to be a law that candidates cannot do their own election investigations or seize anything whatsoever or in any way tread upon the election process, it belongs to the people not the candidates. They can and will use established methods for challenging elections or suffer the consequences of becoming a felon.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    They already sort of are and that's a good thing. The way some elections work is there's a representative from both parties observing and counting the ballots. Then they can both check each other's work and make sure everything's above board.

    This is why the whole election denial stuff is even more bullshit, they have official observers in there who can blow the whistle if they see anything but they never do. So they just rely on "reports" of other outside observers who think every truck moving around a polling spot is full of fraudulent ballots.

    It probably shouldn't be just election workers as they're just selected by whoever applies to a temp job for a day or two, and it wouldn't take much for all those people to just happen to be partisans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    Stolen not seized.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Of course he is a rabid trumper

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    The funniest thing that could happen in CA is voters have to choose between two Republican governors and they both argue about the other rigging the election.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Except for one of those two fascist idiots ending up being in charge of the state. THAT would be decidedly unfun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    There would be a recall 3 seconds after they take office lmao

    One would hope CA realizes they need to change their voting system to stop being garbage after this. Jungle primary with top 2 (or top 4) advancing is fine, but there needs to be approval or ranked voting in the first round.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I just find it so funny that the dem field is so dilute that gop is potentially leading right now in California. Like, Dems just need to choose Porter, Swalwell, and one or two more, but they're scared to because it will smell like choosing kamala and hillary (with good reason).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It's prob not gonna happen anyway. Rs don't get that high a vote share and all of the polls have the combined R share close to the typical total R share already, with like 20% undecided that are largely D. There's a real shot still that it's two Ds anyway just because Bianco and Hilton are capped out on support already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    probably, but like i am having trouble deciding between Swalwell and Porter (lots of lawyers and judges in the family so i understand them when they talk and feel kinship, also i like Porter's whiteboard and Swalwell's performance in the 45 impeachments (yes i know the senate was going to do nothing anyways, he explained stuff well and in a digestible manner) and i can see 5 or 6 actually electable Dems hanging in there until the election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    The Media: "Our top story today, OMYGAWD The Bachelorette has been cancelled! But first SPORTS!"

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So now the fascist GOP knows how 600k Californians voted? I guess we better hope that the guy in charge isn’t vindictive about people not supporting him.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I know this isn't really the right time for this, but the US desperately needs a proper census system, the fact that there is a debate if a voter is properly registered or not for a general election is insane.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    there is no real debate, just like there is no real debate that climate change is happening.

    It is a ruse, a “big lie” repeated over and over again as a long-term strategy to gain authoritarian control.

    there has never been any evidence of unregistered or unpermitted voters casting ballots beyond a few dozen isolated cases over the last 25 years - a vanishingly small occurrence among the billions of votes cast. Almost any method to “fix” those few dozen occurrences wipes out hundreds of thousands to many millions of valid voters; an intended result of the disenfranchisement strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    So if someones ID expires and the "save" act went through, I'm curious if they would actually accept a birth certificate. It's not like a birth certificate even could have a photo ID on it. I believe it or not have grown about 200lbs since then. So the picture would be useless anyways. Then obviously people point out that a birth certificate is useless for anyone with a name change unless they are bringing the name change paperwork (marriage certificates or the like) just to prove they are that person. Half the country doesn't have passports do to cost and the fact that they expire as well. Drivers licenses aren't held by everyone, cost money, and also they can be legally suspended or taken for driving infractions which do not have anything to do with whether or not you are legally allowed to vote. Not to mention they expire as well.

    The only way the save act would make sense is if everyone was provided free identification that was valid and you didnt need any other identification to acquire it. You don't have to own a house to vote, you don't have to be on a lease to vote, your name doesn't have to be on a electric bill or such to vote. So none of those documents would make sense to ask for.

    There is no easy way to do a system that is better than what is currently in place and as far as the majority are told, there is no evidence of it being tampered with enough to change it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    They don't want an accurate account so that way they can make up whatever number they want.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    they're going to bungle it intentionally so they can point to inaccuracies and claim california's 2026 vote is fraudulent. let me tell you how i know: they did not hire qualified auditors. you want this done right, Ernst&Young or KPMG are the only folk for the job. hell, pwc would do it honorably and the republicans and them have a history.

    also they are republicans, but like, there are professional, unbiased reasons too why this is pure partisan poppycock

    edit: fuck deloitte

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    there is no debate. it's done properly and thoroughly. the whining comes from republicans, who are the same people who whine that you must have rolled the dice wrong and you need to reroll (so they can really have one more turn) when you just won the game you were playing

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    And so it begins...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Would be real funny if he turned up cold in Baker.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    We are supposed to trust a institutional liar?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago
    4 comments in c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    Bianco is an outspoken Trump supporter who said in an endorsement video in 2024 that, after 30 years of putting criminals in jail, he figured it was “time to put a felon in the White House — Trump 2024, baby” — referencing Trump’s conviction by a New York jury for falsifying business records while paying hush money to a porn actor.

    This is a trial run for November. Republicans have completely abandoned democracy.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    No indication of voter fraud, but electoral fraud by the Grand Old Pedophiles is rampant, and Bianco's tactics are just another example.

    Wikipedia: Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, election scam, voter fraud, vote rigging, or election engineering,[1] involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both.[2] It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Surely there's a case to be made that the due to his vested interest and those votes no longer being with the election officials, the use of those votes as evidence is now null and void because it can't be verified that they haven't been tampered with?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Finding fraud will make him wealthy and famous. Any bets on what he will find?

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/los_angeles@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    If the findings don't change the vote, charge the sheriff personally with the cost of the recount.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago*

    Cost doesn't mean anything. It's just a play and another attempt to rile up the base.

    I feel like this is the epitome of what is wrong with the modern world. Bad faith actors have learned how to exploit civility and eradicate truth.

    • Find something you don't like and shriek, confidently, and without any evidence, that it is corrupt/bad/evil.
    • Demand that a blatantly biased "authority" gets access to evidence so that they can "ensure" that is isn't corrupt/bad/evil.
    • If you are denied, shriek some more and claim it's because they are hiding the truth and that it's obviously corrupt/bad/evil.
    • If you aren't denied, have the "authority" verifying things lie and say that they discovered it's corrupt/bad/evil.
    • If an independent authority authenticates that it isn't corrupt/bad/evil, call that authority corrupt/bad/evil and continue shrieking at the top of your lungs.
    • Use either outcome as an excuse to take over and make things the way you want them to be without actual consensus.
    • Whine and complain that you are a victimized minority and repeat.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    How is it legal for a candidate in the race to "seize" ballots? This should be disqualifying. It's literally election tampering.

  • source