I read this with yoda's voice.

It still gives context to why the person conflated the statement with Israel.

Though I think anyone in tune with the news cycle would conflate killing children with Israel.

This is actually something I don't understand when this argument is brought up. Havent they both been killing each other since well before the modern period?

It made a little more sense when the argument was that Hamas is bad, but that doesn't justify collateral damage to Palestinian civilians when targeting them. But it seems to me the rhetoric I see often has switched to making excuses for Hamas, who directly tries to kill children whenever they get the opportunity, including putting their own Palestinian civilians in the line of fire to confuse attacks against them and get them killed as "martyrs". Which they use to justify their actions, even though they caused it.

I don't see how Israel' careless around getting noncombatants killed justifies deliberately targeting civilians, which Hamas does constantly, or doing things like putting a rocket launcher on top of a hospital just so it looks bad for Israel when they destroy it. It's not like Hamas wants a peaceful two-state solution and Israel just isn't playing along. And theres not a lot of anti-Hamas sentiment in Gaza since they get murdered by Hamas, and they did vote them in in the first place.

She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.

She hosted Motaz Azaiza, the "journalist" who frequently praises Hamas, and was present with Hamas at the October 7th attack itself. So I correct myself, he only might have participated in directly killing civilians and children, but he was at least hanging out with his friends when they were doing that.