This kid:

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 438 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Spud, who was recording on his Ray-Ban Meta smartglasses, walked down the hallway by the main entrance while stating his support for ICE and law enforcement.

Of course the bootlicker was wearing meta glasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 115 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Didn’t the kid (Spud) also spout off about “school code”?

    I don’t know any schools that let you video record in a school without consent. Dude is wearing a recording device as glasses and did not get consent from anyone in the school. That’s against school code, bruuuuuuuuuuuh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 8 months ago

    The article says Spud did get one day of in school suspension for recording in the school. He also complained others were also recording. Maybe if spud had not posted the video online he spills not have been caught.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    I remember visiting the teens center at a local library. I saw a bit of nerd merch I thought was really cool, so I went to take a picture of it, and the librarian there was on me in a flash to stop photography. Recording protection is a real thing when it matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 322 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    They gave my hero a couple of days off school as a reward, gotta love it.

    😆 1
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Hopefully he got paid free 100s for those days off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 164 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 135 points 8 months ago* (28 children)

    If I was duders parents that'd be two days of pizza and soda and a informative talk about how permanent records are bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (24 children)
  • [–] 38 points 8 months ago* (23 children)

    Pretty much yeah. Like if you burn a school down or catch felony charges (Homey woulda got a misdemeanor if anything and a slap on the wrist punishment if it did go to trial.) thats a whole other thing, but popping a dude in the jaw? You aren't losing your shot at MIT or Yale or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (22 children)

    You need to know that though. I disclosed a suspension I didn’t need to and got a rejection letter from my dream school, which was super interested in me until after they called me to ask about it. The rejection was dated the same day as the phone call, so I’m pretty sure that’s it, because they’d already separately sent two people an hour and a half to sell me on the school.

    The suspension was for going to breakfast with my carpool buddy on her first day back in school, after her grandfather died. On the way in, she started hyperventilating and saying she couldn’t go in that day and having her first experience with death, so we went to a diner instead. We got sandwiches and she talked about her grandfather for an hour, then she was calm enough to go into school. If we’d explained it to any of the adults in our lives, they’d have been fine with it, but we lied about it and got the minimum punishment for skipping school once it all came out (she folded). I didn’t realize that it wasn’t on my school record, so I included it on my college applications.

    If I’d gone there, I probably wouldn’t have studied abroad, which later enabled me to immigrate to Germany, so I’m not too upset about it anymore, but it sucked at the time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (21 children)

    Why the fuck would you ever narc on yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (20 children)

    I disclosed my history accurately because I am comfortable with my choices and if I lose out on something because of them, I can accept that.

    I stay happy with myself that way, which is more valuable to me than a specific school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (19 children)

    There's zero advantage to ever do that, you can only be happy narcing on yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (18 children)

    There’s not zero advantage to honesty, my friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (17 children)

    Did they ask you a question where you either had to narc on yourself or lie? Because voluntarily narcing on yourself isn't honesty, its stupidity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (16 children)

    Of course they asked about suspensions and expulsions, I wasn’t just writing in “and then one time, I stole candy from the store…”

    But no, I don’t really care about presenting a specific face to a specific audience. I engage in appropriate security around any information that isn’t mine to share or that could endanger a friend, but if I’m going to lose out on a school for being a supportive friend, I don’t want to go to that school.

    I guess there was a benefit in identifying that that school was going to be full of people who do want to lie about their behavior for their own gain, which I’m not interested in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (15 children)

    I dunno man, the way you're talking made it sound like you just freely offered up that information. How the hell am I supposed to know? You do you, but you're doing yourself a disservice. Protecting yourself by omitting sensitive information doesn't hurt anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (14 children)

    Well, it’s a college application, so of course it’s a question they ask. They also asked about my grades.

    I’m not doing myself a disservice by being honest about my actions. To cover them up for my own gain is cowardly and makes the world a worse place, in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (13 children)

    Not admitting something is not covering it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (12 children)

    Whatever evasion someone might suggest feels chickenshit to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (11 children)

    And narcing on yourself for some false sense of moral superiority feels cuckhold to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (10 children)

    I am actually into cuckqueaning!

    And again, I’m not ashamed of myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (8 children)

    Cuckholding is for men, cuckqueaning is for women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (7 children)

    Wat? Why does that concept need gender specific words? How is cuckhold not gender neutral? I don't understand 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (6 children)

    When I’m looking up porn, I’m fully uninterested in 90% of what comes up for cuckholding, so having a separate term is helpful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    I don't approve of separate gendered words to convey the exact same concept, that's just silly, but I can see how it would be useful when looking up porn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (4 children)

    It’s very useful for porn, but it’s also a different thing culturally. Cuckholding involves playing on people’s internalized toxic masculinity and often has really weird racial overtones or implications that a woman in a hetero partnership is property of the man.

    Cuckqueaning involves playing on people’s internalized beauty standards and doesn’t really have the raceplay aspect.

    It’s not like actor and actress, where it’s the same exact thing except for the gender.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    Does cuckhold porn ever take on those cuckquean traits, and vice versa? To me it just comes across as subgenres stemming from the same basic concept. Also, how does cuckqueaning play on beauty standards? I'm not following that description.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    It may, I’m not an expert, just an enthusiastic amateur. I don’t think it would really work very well, but porn isn’t exactly known for its continuity.

    The insecurity at play under Cuckholding is that you’re not man enough, and under cuckqueaning it’s that you’re not attractive enough (roughly).

    In real life, I wish I had to deal less with the side effects of being considered attractive (I’m normal looking, but that’s all that’s needed for creepy comments and more all over the place), so I enjoy playing off of that during sex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Gotcha, that makes more sense. So its just driven by insecurity, but the type of insecurity is the determining factor. I could see see scenarios where both variants could be applied to the opposite gender, but I think a lot of tastes, porn included, are algorithm driven these days so it seems unlikely you'd ever see something like that.

    That conversation took a real left turn, but I learned something new so thank you for that. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Yes, though I would caution you about that level of reductiveness. I know men into Cuckholding and women into cuckqueaning and they’ve got relatively little in common personality-wise. They’re both founded on insecurity, but a kink for nuns and a kink for feet are both founded on a longing for the forbidden and they’re not the same.

    Edit: do femme and masc hit you better than women and men?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 117 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    Punch a Nazi and get two days off of school. Sounds like a clear win.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 8 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    "Literal torture and abuse" by "radical pacifist type liberals" huh?

    What in the psyop are you trying to pull there, Jerry?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    There was a whole dialogue about "is it OK to punch nazis" in like 2016. Most libs in my life, including a college professor were very against punching nazis. I'm certain any comment section outside of Lemmy is full of libs going "You can't just assault people because of their opinions, that makes you just as bad as nazis".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago*

    20 years ago I might have said you shouldn't punch a kid for saying Nazi shit, because he doesn't understand what he is saying and is probably just being edgy. By 2016 I was pretty on board with punching Nazis. In 2026, while I still would not punch a child because I am an adult, that's about as far as I will go with that statement. Kid did good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, I've been writing about this idiocy since almost thirty years. Fighting evil doesn't make you just as bad as evil. Using that "logic", we were wrong to bomb the hell out of the Nazis and shoot them in Europe. We were "bad" to do so? I don't think so. It's idiotic to think that. In fact, it's an utter betrayal of the enlightenment values amongst which we gained the idea of nuance under the law. It portrays a philosophy devoid of any actual thought, relying simply on mindless knee-jerk reactions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 8 months ago* (10 children)
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    It's stuff you made up in your head to push your position/narritive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 8 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    Calling you out for posting made up nonsense broadly attacking a group you frequently disparage is not vagueposting, that's very direct. Even if you believe your prejudices truly are representative enough of the whole to warrant being shared, which no, don't try and dismiss their criticism by reframing what they've said as something you can object to. That's not what they were doing, and what you're doing is transparent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 8 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    there is a very harmful liberal pacifist tendency in a significant part of the population which leads to people being punished for fighting back against injustice?

    You think a significant part of the population would torture their child over this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, definitely. Plenty of parents would just see "my son punched someone at school and got suspended for 2 days" and they would do everything in their power to make those 2 days hell as punishment. I'm honestly amazed some of y'all seem not to be familiar with these types of parents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Yeah you know what, I do in fact think that you've made up the idea that liberals are prone to torturing their children. Gonna stick with that. No idea what any of the rest of that has to do with torturing their children, and most of it is highly conservative behavior, so. Just gonna ignore it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The (again made up) assumption that I've lived a sheltered life is another attempt to dismiss the argument as baseless instead of addressing it. You have no evidence for these claims, you've just got your prejudice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    You've definitely lived a sheltered life if you don't believe in shitty parents, idk what to tell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago*

    My argument has never been that shitty parents don't exist, don't try to present like I have ever claimed that. Everything here is pointing out that your fantasy - that a significant proportion of parents fall into the category of "pacifist liberals who torture their kids" - is something you just plain made up.

    Edit: Oh. Well thank you, mods!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 107 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The school also offered Spud a “safety plan” in response to online threats he has received, but Spud said he declined the plan.

    Of course he has, if a troll behaves they cannot troll people!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Administration: "Okay, potato... err... Spud. Here's our suggestion: Don't support murder and internment of minority groups. Especially publicly. It's likely to make people angry at you and may be dangerous."

    Potato: "No that's my only hobby"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 93 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    He knew the consequences, he did it anyway. Legend.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    He should get punished. Doesn't mean it was the wrong thing to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's a textbook example of chaotic good. He broke the rules to do the morally good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    Neutral Good considers the rules and tends to acknowledge owledge the rules are usually good, but sometimes should be bent or broken. Chaotic Good ranges from "Fuck the rules!" to "Any rule that oppresses the people is bullshit" to "The rules are sometimes okay, I guess, but I'm gonna ignore them without remorse when they make no sense." Minding that the Good component means they tend not to break rules for self-gain and/or at the expense of decent people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Yup, I think it's appropriate. He punched someone at school. Actions have consequences no matter the reason behind it. I got suspended for a day because a bully had his hands around my throat and I cold cocked him in the side of the head.

    It's what makes us better human beings than the right. We are perfectly okay with holding people we agree with accountable for their actions. I hope this kid has a great two day vacation from school. Sleep in and put your feet up, kid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    You absolutely should not have been punished for defending yourself in that situation; strangulation is attempt at murder. Did anything happen to the other kid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Nope. Because schools and 'zero tolerance' policies protect abusers, not victims. by design. It's easier to punish the person lashing out and throwing punches vs someone deliberately trying to get you to kill yourself.

    Just like we're seeing here in 2026 when my incident happened in 2003. I'm more pissed he didn't get anything rather than I got something. I happily took the suspension. I owned that with pride. It fell on a Friday so I had a 3 day weekend. My mom went into the school and tore the administration several new assholes. Fortunately after that I wasn't abused by him or anyone anymore other than faint insults like being called a 'fa**ot' by 6 dudes who were pants fabric away from touching dicks while I walked down the road holding hands with my new girlfriend.

    I'm in my late 30s now. I've been married for 8 years and have two wonderful girlfriends in a poly relationship. He's divorced and barely gets to see his kids last I heard from friends back in my hometown. A quick Facebook search shows her with a new last name an kids with the new guy. So regardless of the past, I guess I won the life lottery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    You seem to speculate that your bullies were jealous of you because you are more successful with women than they are, or because they were secretly gay. In my case, we had very little parental supervision and everyone bullied one another to some degree. We used to play a game of tag where the person who got caught by 'it' would be tied to a tree and lashed with a switch, and the person tied to a tree had to escape in order to become 'it.'

    edit: So, this is supposed to be a cautonary tale against not watching your kids, not "admitting to bullying people smarter than me." All kids in my grade played this game together. Now that I know what kind of social space I am in, I will no longer be sharing any personal information with this crowd. Thanks for letting me know that you're nuts, or at least a nonzero number of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I love how you admitted all of that, while I never suggested any of it. I never assumed anyone was 'secretly gay'. My point was my bullies were incredibly stupid people. They used basic insults because they thought it was funny regardless of the context. They were 6 dudes in close proximity calling a single man holding hands with a girl a 'fa**ot'. Not to mention I came out queer a few years ago so whatever you want to say about that won't make a lick of difference to me.

    It's the intellectual significance, and lack thereof with the bullies. They're so stupid they just sling words to try to get a rise, not aware of the circumstance around it. No one with any critical thinking or intelligent thought would call a man with a woman on his arm a 'fa**ot' while the people slinging it are balls deep with other guys in a group huddle.

    It's amazing how much you just admitted to being just that. A remarkably illiterate idiot who used to bully people smarter than you because you were a dumb insecure idiot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 87 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    If I was his parent I would’ve made those two days the best

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I’d have a stern talking to the lad, while he’s eating the biggest wad of cotton candy on whatever mega-rollercoaster is closest to our house.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 231 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    Punch a nazi, get 2 days off going to school full of nazis. Nice.

    Also: The nazi kid's name is Spud. Bro is a literal potato.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I was wondering what the other guys parents thought of their kid. Then I saw the guy is 18 and clearly trying to do the shit stirring influencer grift.

    Went ahead a blocked him on all the platforms I had accounts for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 51 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Went ahead a blocked him on all the platforms I had accounts for.

    We must not look at goblin men,

    We must not buy their fruits:

    Who knows upon what soil they fed

    Their hungry thirsty roots?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 8 months ago

    And a lifetime of cred.

    Fucking legend.

  • source
  • [–] 78 points 8 months ago

    More people should honour Punch a Nazi Day.

    (In case of doubt, Punch a Nazi Day falls on any day that ends in ‘y’.)

  • source
  • [–] 74 points 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago

    So far I don't think it exists. At least not with gofundme as it would violate their TOS apparently. Danny Spud has a site, but I'd question it (and won't post it because of that). Our brown hoodie hero is unnamed and hopefully will remain so for a while given the propensity of the right to be retributive in their violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 137 points 8 months ago
    [–] 65 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    “I thought to myself, how can so many people be against law enforcement and officials trying to make our country better and safer?”

    'Thought' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago

    'Thought' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there

    Yeah, it would have to. What with the "trying to make our country better and safer?” part being more than a few imperial fucktons of the most putrid bullshit you've ever seen 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›