all 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 8 months ago (1 child)

You know, I don't even care about that. What I do care about is billionaires who have been stealing our wages and wealth for decades. We need a fair living wage, $20/hr at a base minimum ($15/hr in 2015 with inflation is now $20/hr), and it should be more than that.

I'm tired of the oligarchs skimming off our wealth to enrich themselves, leaving most of us barely managing to get by. I'm fucking sick of it.

Refund Trump's tariff bullshit? Sure, fine, that's not a bad start, but that's a drop in the damn bucket.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 8 months ago

    Oh, so now the guy who has promised to veto a billionaire tax is a populist?

  • source
  • [–] 147 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    I love the sound of that.

    But it isn't happening. Corporations will get a refund. People will not, and the prices will remain elevated.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    BINGO! Once prices go up corporations are not going to drop them. They’ve seen people can pay it and that’s now the new threshold.

    It’s a saddening truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    Just like when many of them nearly doubled prices during those few months of super high inflation a couple years ago. No idea how people just accepted that month or two of 9% inflation somehow meant 150% prices are justified.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    I'm kind of tired of this "acceptance" of loss. Like, I get it, I don't think it's incorrect. It's just at a certain point I think it becomes a means of a collective justification for inaction. In the same way that this fake shit from Newsom serves the same purpose of inaction.

    It feels like the peasants of feudalism just accepting that their share of crop is getting reduced. "Welp, guess we'll just eat less this winter. Hope Timmy survives the cold".

    I guess I'm looking for this same comment but with rage and anger. The passive doomerism needs to go. Us peasants need to be talking about the best methods for sharpening our pitchforks with every inch of crop they take from us.

    At the end up the day. This "truth" is only true for as long as we allow it to be. We should remember that and repeat that truth with every inch they take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Let me know how that works out for you. Cheers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not talking about adventurism you twat. I'm not even talking about collective action. I'm talking about showing some emotion and anger at the very fucking least.

    This passive acceptance and doomerism is so fucking boring. If you're not going to at least be outraged can people like you just shut the fuck up?

    You're literally respond with the same peasant brained acceptance. No one's impressed with your apathy. It doesn't make you look smart. It makes you look like a coward.

    But go ahead. Give me another apathetic one line response. Good luck with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    The anger will just increase stress and increase the risk of long-term health issues that you'll ALSO have to pay for out of pocket.

    You are simply not allowed to win on any transaction EVER.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Ironically, that is exactly what would happen with Gavin Newsom if he won presidency in even a far cry of a free and fair election.

    Gavin Newsom is fighting a billionaire wealth tax in Cali right fucking now. He's shut down universal healthcare in Cali when he had a chance.

    We can do better than this scumfuck asshole who believes in nothing. Remember that during the primaries people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We really do need people to participate in the primaries in 2 years.

    That said, if he wins the primary then I'm going door to door to promote his ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    I get it. I wouldn't, at least not outside of voting for the lesser evil. It'd be disingenuous for me to believe this isn't just going to exacerbate all the reasons that led to Trump taking power to begin with.

    Assuming he won in that scenario, I think I'd use the next 4 years to leave the country and try to live where a progressive democracy and the rule of law actually matters; personally of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    If you paid the tarrif directly to the government then you have a chance for a refund. If you paid for higher prices that were passed onto us don't hold your breath for that refund.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    wouldn't holding your breath that long kill you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Except that money is already gone.

    Concentration camps. Ice agents.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Yes but the refund is to the businesses that passed the cost of the tariffs on to the consumers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago

    WHERE’S THE MONEY LEBOWSKI

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago*

    ur telling me taxing Switzerland for having a Woman president isn't a national emergency? Did I mention her voice was bitchy and she was a womans?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    The refund isn't for us. It's for his buddies that pre purchased the right to collect those refunds with significant windfalls on both sides of the transaction.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    There will be a refund. It will go to the corpos. Newsom will spin this as a good thing.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    Stop filing taxes. Tea party 5.0. Buy tea instead and literally throw it at them. Like physically, with a cannon.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Out of curiosity and totally unrelated, is it even possible to make munitions out of tea? Like, can you compress it into a sphere and fire it from a 17th century cannon, or would you just wind up with a bang and dense mist of tea?

    This got me wondering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Sounds like a question for the hydraulic press guy. See if tea compresses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I think it would, but I also think it may just create a blockage that makes the cannon sort of explode, hurting anyone nearby?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I think it would be easier to compress it to the shape of cylinder, not sphere, and technically you can shoot it, but it will will dissembody during the shooting, like projectiles in the shooting, so the tea will travel a cone in space and probably do not much harm because of small weight of the particles.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Best guess is that some corporations might get a refund since they paid the tariffs and they will pocket the money.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    It's even funnier than that. People connected to Trump bought rights to get refunds from corporation a year ago for cents on the dollar. Now they will make billions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I've seen this mentioned a few times on Lemmy but can't find any articles talking about this. Do you have a source? It sounds very believable, but I want to make sure it's true before I start telling people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    The Supreme Court actually ruled that it must be given back. Who does it go to?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The corporations who 'paid it'. Not the people who paid the increased price but the companies who paid the tariff. So hundreds of companies are about to get a massive influx of money, once again courtesy of the American taxpayers.

    Are you winning yet, America?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh it's much worse than the way Newsom sanitizes it here. Trump's plan is to personally steal billions from us by sending that tariff revenue to his mock UN "Board of Peace" outside US law, which then gives it directly to him.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Posts like this show how economic messaging has become central to politics. At the end of the day, most people just want affordability and clarity about who’s responsible for what.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    1992, a Clinton campaign catchphrase was, "It's the economy, stupid" and the New Deal in 1933 was about "economic messaging". In 1890 Republicans lost big time in part due to the McKinley tariffs. Economic messaging in the U.S. has been central to politics for far longer than living memory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    General strike on paying your taxes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago*

    If it's paying for Nazis to curb stomp citizen's rights granted by the Constitution, while depriving us of the services our tax dollars pay for, while cutting the taxes of folks who will never want for anything in life‽ Fucking absolutely against them. My tax dollars are not the Nazis slush fund for concentration camps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I applied for a federal job, was given an offer, and had that offer revoked because of Trump’s EO against trans people. This government is actively hostile to my existence and provides me little in return, so yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    When the federal government is illegally withholding funding for programs in blue states, justified based on Fox News fever dreams? Yes, taxation is literally theft. That's the definition of theft - having money taken from you by force without receiving fair compensation in return. This is the federal government behaving less like an elected government responsible to the people and more like an occupying army. We're seeing the federal government morph into a tribute empire, where red states militarily occupy and collect tribute from the blue states. The only difference between taxes and tribute is whether you get your share of the money back. When funds are being illegally held for political reasons? You're damn right taxation is theft.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Hmmm. Class action lawsuit? Can you do that against the government?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It's happened in the past, but believe the government has to agree to be sued.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    They sorta have to agree (because of sovereign immunity). But there are laws like the Tucker Act and the Administrative Procedure Act that already (probably) pave the way for this lawsuit. Additionally, if the government is acting outside statutory authority (ultra vires), sovereign immunity doesn't protect the same way.

    Also, this would almost certainly be heard in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which deals with tariffs and the like, and has its own rules and such. So... it's complicated?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Is this where trickle down economics is supposed to work?

    As the companies that receive refunds will pass the money onto the customers who paid them?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Refund? Yes, but not only the money, but the job, too.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    All the states should sue, then kicker us back the amount at tax time.

    Except the welfare red states.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    This should be in an Enough Newsom Spam community so we can block it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Time for impeachment

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Maybe I'm starting to think that those right-libertarians may have a point about taxation. I still support paying taxes to the IRS and such, though.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    You can find billing templates online.

    Send in your own bill for your personal refund soon, before all that money is gone.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    How is this a meme?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Go for it, and good luck.

  • source
  • [+] -39 points 8 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago*

    You can tell Donnie's poll numbers are in the gutter for midterms when his troll farms reach this far and he's shutting down Gallup's approval-rating tracker lmao.

    Such pathetic desperation.

  • source
  • parent