top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I still prefer to open my window and just scream for the person I’m trying to reach. Fuhgedaboutet

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    They got trounced by Ventrilo, which had the saddest looking UI I’ve ever seen on a commercial product.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 8 months ago

    There was something kind of special about how simple Vent was. It didn't need a bunch of bells and whistles, it did one thing and it was relatively easy for people to use. Discord feels so cluttered and it's full of shit I don't want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    TeamSpeak had their chance, but they decided to be complacent after getting popular. Now they are playing catchup and very slowly. Discord has given them multiple chances now to take back market share, but TeamSpeak was never ready. This time some other project will take over instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Its also closed source as i recently learned...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Mobile app is dogshit but the Teamspeak 6 desktop client is decent.

    Ultimately my group is using Steam for now and checking out Fluxer self-hosting once the refactor gets done.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I hadn't heard of Fluxer before this post, but after looking it looks like it's basically everything I've been looking for. Hopefully that refactor gets sorted relatively soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I’m in the same boat. Fluxed looks really good! I was able to check it out this morning but I’m assuming their website is getting hammered because I can’t access it now. More people to FOSS self hosted projects! Woo!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    TeamSpeak can only replace the voice chatting aspect. The vast majority of people use discord for text chat.

    It's really such a different beast. You can chat in a discord server while you're on your phone when you're unavailable to chat on voice. I know teamspeak has an app, but it was clunky last time I bothered with it, and it's still not that type of experience. People love discord chat, they love the emotes, they love their profiles. I just can't see a lot of people giving that up.

    And like I've said earlier, I'm not even sure if most people are aware of the changes or if they even care. The people from Aus or the UK that I've seen on discord lately seem like they're just dealing with the id requirements.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    This is my issue with finding a replacement, text and voice in one with specific channels.

    I like to segregate my topics so things don't get too cluttered, it's why I moved from Skype to Discord originally. But I also want my voice chat and text chats to be in the same program.

    I've used Ventrilo and TeamSpeak before for voice and I liked the self hosting option, but no text. IRC is text without voice. Matrix looks... complicated to self host.

    So I'm looking at Stoat (formerly Revolt)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    This is my issue with finding a replacement, text and voice in one with specific channels.

    Currently, Movim offers very good text chat (even offers optional encryption!), as well as group video/voice calls as well as screensharing with audio (must use a chromium browser to share the audio for now). It also has fully fleshed out and working federation, which is super important in the long-term. it works across all platforms, and runs in the browser.

    Downsides: It is currently missing Discord-like servers with rooms, but the dev is actively working on implementing those, and later drop-in voice rooms. They also just launched a funding drive to help accelerate development. It's not quite as polished and smooth as Discord in the UX department, but it does work reliably, and it's available right now.

    If those tradeoffs aren't deal breakers, than I'd say it's definitely worth a try. It's very quick to sign-up to test, as it doesn't require an email.

    So I’m looking at Stoat (formerly Revolt)

    Currently, Stoat cannot yet perform video calls or screenshare, though I believe they are working on that. It is also not federated, and I don't believe there are plans to implement any federation, which is personally a big knock against it.

    I'd say if you find that Movim isn't workable for you, you may want to wait for Fluxer to improve, as that does plan to implement federation and limited encryption, the downside is it's quite buggy at the moment, and it could be a while before it's ready.

    Hope that helps :)

    Also @QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works, @kurcatovium@piefed.social

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I'm checking out Fluxer and Movim. I don't NEED video chat, sometimes we steam games while other people are just chilling out so they can watch, but it's uncommon. It's a small group of friends so huge support isn't massive either.

    The federation stuff would be very nice since that's a big oof on Stoat at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Just throwing out that Matrix isn't particularly complicated to host, BUT I don't think it is a 1:1 replacement for Discord. Discord is honestly a bit odd in some ways, which was probably on purpose as it made them standout and be harder to replace.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    If only Mumble contained more than 10% of the features Discord does.

    I'm tired of people suggesting replacements that only do one small part of what Discord does. It's like needing a new car, and all people keep suggesting is new engines. I don't care if the engine is better than my current car, an engine alone does not solve my needs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    In recent years, I started to feel differently. Sure, it's nice if you have 1 app/1 tool to do a lot of things, but it comes at the price of dependency. When a service/tool turns to shit (which seems to be a matter of time in most cases), it's so much harder to find something new.

    So I tend to prefer a lot of different simple tools that can do one thing only, but they can do that one thing right. And if it turms to shit, I can just replace the single tool instead of having to find an alternative that can do everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    Tool vs Platform.

    Tools can focus on specific things and you can judge them based on how good they at doing the thing they do.

    Platform?

    Platforms create network effect lock in and breed complacency far, far more than a tool does.

    Tools, sure, can induce a kind of brand loyalty type of squabbling, but platforms are an entire way of life, they become a default part of your identity and worldview. It becomes ludicrous, rage inducing, for you to imagine or consider not using the platform.

    Oh you want the omni tool?

    Omni tool requires you upload your soul to it, as collateral.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I feel the exact same way.. Sadly I don't think the perfect option exists, it would require something that's both an encrypted IM program and something you could self host servers on and plug into so users could join based on a link. Like Skype/icq meets teamspeak.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Steam had 90% of the tooling just needs polishing

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    I never thought about that. I use the voice chat a little bit, but you are right that it works well enough and I can stream my games.

    The only pain point would be for people that don't use steam for whatever reason. Discord offers the web interface which is useful when video chatting with non gamers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago*

    I said this like 2 years ago and people called me an idiot, but I'm glad more people are seeing this now.

    Steam has all the infrastructure to be a social network platform the same way Discord or Facebook is, it has most of the distinct components already present, they're just clunky, not as well integrated as they could be, UI still has a lot of legacy stuff that'd need to be refactored.

    It would just need an overhaul... and of course, Valve actually deciding they want to deal with all the insane bullshit that comes with trying to run a social network explicitly as a social network.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    I mean TeamSpeak did only one thing, and it was good.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Posted this as a reply to someone else, but seems they have deleted their comment, but here is a spreadsheet someone is working on that compares the different options now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14vicw-V9Z5m7ckuburP5wxyDIIb_fFJFEjnxxHk8qRw/edit?gid=0#gid=0

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I don't really get it. Every time I've reluctantly used Discord, I've gotten absolutely lost in UI. And I don't know what's wrong with just using Steam calls (for games) which works great tbh.

    But the really annoying thing about Discord is when open source communities use it. Open source projects have no business using closed platforms like this, where I can't even browse the discussions without signing up, and you can't find bug reports by search engine. Just use some open discussion forum software. GitHub discussions is fine...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Just use some open discussion forum software.

    GitHub discussions is fine…

    Pick one. Github most certainly is not open.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    was an ok meme shitting on discord, but most platforms suck ass

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Twitter is the new 4chan

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Teamspeak is actually insane in 2026. Just goes to show what kind of progress in online communicators can be made if you invest into anything reasonable and not surveillance.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (61 children)

    So seriously, what's going to replace Discord? Everyone wants to leave, but to where?

    And no, Matrix is not and will never be a viable alternative

  • source
  • hideshow 61 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago* (25 children)

    I've seen mentioned these:

    • Stoat - pretty much same UI, based in UK, not sure where they get $$
    • Fluxer - looks virtually like 1:1 Discord clone, based in Sweden, has paid tier pretty much like Nitro on Discord on official server
    • Nerimity - a little different UI, but still very Discord-y, based in UK, sourced from donations
    • Movim - this one is interesting, but it's not really Discord style app; it looks more like cross breed between IM and social network (FB/X), origin in France
    • Strafe - looks like Discord, supposedly have e2ee
    • Spacebar - reverse engineered Discord, IDK about maturity of this one
    • Adapt - another wanna be
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Why is "one-to-one clone of Discord" the goal for everyone? Why not set your sights on a making a good UX instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I don't think it's necessarily the goal — Discord is just a helpful yardstick to compare things to as a baseline (and some people are looking for something that replaces Discord as closely as possible). Having to switch services is a pain, and whilst it's not optimal in the long term to just try to replace a thing with a clone, I can see why people don't have the executive function energy to think too hard about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Well, Discord's UI is certainly not the holy grail, but it's quite functional and people are used to it. So it's pretty much logical you copy the concept to some extent when you want to appeal to these people?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    It's literally on Fluxer.

    Pros:

    • AGPLv3, WITHOUT a CLA
    • Familiar Discord UI
    • Text and voice channels
    • Images, attachments, gifs
    • Emojis, reactions
    • Screensharing and video calls
    • Main server runs decently fast
    • Federation is coming
    • Not based in UK or US

    Cons:

    • Only 1 dude working on it
    • You can optionally buy Plutonium, which isn't necessarily bad, they need money, and the code stays Open Source™
    • No mobile app yet (they're working on it)
    • The main server has had some downtime... which I think are just growing pains
    • I don't have friends to invite to Fluxer
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    This looked perfect! Right up until the no API support. By no means am I asking of that either, just happens to look really nice but also lack that feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Stoat still doesn't have screenshare. It's also a bloody stupid name - I have no idea who thought that re-brand was a good idea.

    Fluxer seems to support it though.

    BNoth can be self-hosted, which is a nice bonus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Do people really use screen share that much? (Sadly) I use discord to reach a lot of my friends for multiple years and we actually used screen share maybe twice? Three times?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I'm honestly surprised it's used that much. My guild (mostly working fathers) used to use TS3 and once discord appeared we switched there for the ease of it. Still used it mostly as voice chat with text channels being nice to have. But screen sharing? Pretty much non existent, quite a few people streamed on twitch, so we never really needed it.

    Same with all the other groups I'm part of there. It's always text + voice, also GIF and meme spam and stuff. But screen share? Virtually zero.

    That's why I'm so surprised.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I use it daily for both work and play.

    In 3d work and game dev it's often far easier to just show people things quickly through it.

    When playing coop games our group will all stream so we can see everyone's PoV. We'll also occasionally use it to watch a movie together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    So you're saying there are options.

    Doesn't Stoat charge far out the ass?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    There are actually many, many options. It's hard to guess which one will get the momentum and lift off though. You probably don't want to convince all your friends to switch to another platform just to see it die in half a year...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago*

    but it’s not really Discord style app; it looks more like cross breed between IM and social network (FB/X)

    It has a built-in blog feature that communities or individuals can use to post announcements or articles to the whole instance, but it's pretty easily ignored by just clicking the messages tab, which doesn't show them at all, and makes the interface look more like Discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    I've also seen Roomy and Voltage mentioned around too but haven't personally looked into them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    The MIT license of Voltage is a big red flag for me, as it could allow for either a corporate takeover, or for the company to abandon the open-source version in favor of a closed-source version that they can sell or enshittify.

    Roomy has pretty much the same problem being licensed under the MPL license, which allows for the project to be packaged into a closed-source proprietary product. I'd avoid it too, despite it being federated. The license is just too risky, and the only reason not to choose GPL is because the devs likely want that capital purchase exit strategy.

    There's a lot devs who know there's potentially a lot of money to be made in a successful Discord alternative. They smell the blood in the water, know the venture capital vultures it attracts, and they'll try to exploit the free labor that open-source projects bring, only to sell us out down the road after all the work has been done.

    I'd say any option we move to must be licensed under GPL as a hard requirement, as that ensures it can never be exploited by corpos, and will remain owned by the community forever so that we don't have to migrate again any time soon.

    The two best options on the table that fill that niche are:

    • Movim (Pros: GPL, federated, encrypted, can do chat, voice calls and screenshare, based on the battle tested XMPP open standard. Cons: is currently missing discord-like rooms, but the dev is working in it)
    • Fluxer (New kid on the block, still very buggy, but is AGPL licensed and plans federation and encryption in the future. Backend is still unproven, don't know how well it scales, but one to keep an eye on)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Matrix is not

    With LiveKit for calls / screen share, it is for my group. Though I'm not saying it doesn't have issues.

    will never be

    Community-developed homeservers like continuwuity have gotten a lot of new support on the last few weeks. Clients like cinny are getting pretty close to a replacement ux wise (if you look at PR2599 on Cinny's GitHub, they are working on and will soon merge support for LiveKit in a way that is very close to voice channels).

    I also generally think that the only way to replace Discord as an ecosystem where you talk to many people from different communities is a federated protocol, not a bunch of new silos, one for each community.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I have no first person experience but I've read Matrix' lack of "Discord-like server" grouping is terrible for moderation where you have to manually set permissions for each "room". If that's actually true it's literally impossible for it to become proper discord alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I've moved to Matrix from Discord for two small friend groups (<6 people each). Matrix is a fine replacement for the small friend Discord. But it has awhile to go before it can replace 1000+ people servers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    The bigger issue is that reports currently don't federate. A report will always go to the admin of your homeserver (which might be you) not the admin of the homeserver the room you're in is on, nor the admin of the homeserver of the other users.

    Most larger (1-2k people) communities get around that by just having you ping the mods in reply to the offending content, which is a band-aid.

    A spec for federated reports is apparently being worked on, but not yet available.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    A discord server-like would be a space, containing channel-like rooms. The main difference is that rooms can also exist independent of spaces, if you just need a single chat for some people instrad of a group of chats.

    You can set permissions for a whole space, it's just that they currently work differently than Discord. Members have a power level, and you set the power level from which each function is available. So, e.g. Sending messages from Pl 0 (representing normal users), banning users from PL 50 (representing moderators), changing server settings from level 100 (representing administrators).

    It sounds complicated, but once you get used to it it's pretty easy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    My group left about 5 years ago (give or take a couple) when there was a hostile takeover of freenode. I haven't really looked into it at all since then, is freenode back or where did everyone move to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    There's Stoat (formerly Revolt) and Fluxer. Additionally, Steam has many Discord-like features in app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I don’t like how fluxer is already paywalling features that other platforms don’t. It feels like discord all over again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Fluxer is AGPv3, recently promised to remove their CLA so the software stays free forever, has an ambitious roadmap with federation, and is currently being worked on by one 22 yr old dude.

    It's very different than Discord.

    This chad needs help. I'm more than happy to support him. This is an investment in Open Source™ and the future. If he can't work on this full-time or near full-time, he's gonna need to work for Google or some shit. Then it's never going to be able to compete with Discord.

    They're also not going to be able to run Fluxer on powerful enough hardware. Take a look at Stoat. Similar idea. No funding. Their main server is HELLA slow, which I don't think it's their fault. The app is written in Rust, but it feels like it's running on a potato.

    paywalling features that other platforms don’t

    I might be wrong here, but I thought you could self-host Fluxer to get around the paywalls. So you could do that. What a gift! And federation is on the way, so maybe one day you can self-host AND talk to other instances! Amazing!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    The problem isn't that there are no alternatives. It's that there's like 50 alternatives. Centralization makes us vulnerable, but it's also super convenient.

    There's a reason we preferred reddit and now Lemmy instead of different forums with different logins for everything.

    The biggest problem with getting off Discord is fragmentation of communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    First one of those contenders that solves federation in a nice way would be a winner. Quite a lot of them has it on their roadmap so my hopes are not completely lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I could probably just google this... but I think I just want to hear a real person explain something this time :P

    What do you mean by "solves federation"? As in bringing disparate groups together under a single app?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    bringing disparate groups together under a single app

    Yep, that's pretty much how I'd like to see it done. Similar to lemmy/piefed, where I can reply to your comment from different server. E.g. Fluxer have something like this in their roadmap, fingers crossed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    And no, Matrix is not and will never be a viable alternative

    Why not? I've been using Matrix for a few years now. I like it, but it definitely lacks refinement and isn’t particularly user-friendly.

    I think of it a bit as being the Linux of messaging platforms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    Slack seems cool to me and my friends, is it not cool to other people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›