top 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 76 points 9 months ago (12 children)

tl;dr:

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Very very likely not the first. We‘ve had rovers on mars for about three decades now and all of them had cameras. Mars days are only slightly longer than earth days so there have been over 10000 opportunities to just point a camera at the horizon and take a picture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    I've seen blue sunset pictures from Mars before, but I suspect someone pumped up the saturation on this picture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Thanks that was interesting. Does mars wobble on it's axis? I know they have a summer and winter so they must I guess. In the winter they get what looks like ice build up around the pole not getting sun, but it's dry ice, co2, super cold -276 or something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    There's a semi-permanent ice cap that's mostly water, but in the winters about a quarter of the atmosphere condenses down into dry ice. The axial tilt is very similar to Earth, but the seasons last significantly longer, and the orbit around the Sun is more elliptical.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Of course. But that's par for the course 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure there aren't any golf courses on Mars yet. Such a waste they are short enough of water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Elon Musk is a piece of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    While true, what does that have to do with this post?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago
    [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Looks like shit. Earth blows this dead red rock out of the water, again. No competition.

    Team Earth!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    What? Who is Tyson responding to?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think noone he just does that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    This person is appreciating a photo, and then he calls them a piece of shit for not appreciating said photo. He does this often? Is this a parody account, or the real scientist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    How large would the sun look to the human eye though? It's tiny on photos, usually appears much bigger

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Grok is this true? Why is the sunset on mars blue?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I would guess it's essentially the same effect that causes our blue sky in the day and red sky at dawn and dusk. TL;DR if you already know what Rayleigh scattering is, skip to the last paragraph

    Okay so the reason that we can "see" the sky, as in it is lit up and has colour, is that sunlight (which is basically white) gets scattered when it passes through the atmosphere instead of just going straight through. This is an effect called Rayleigh scattering. Rayleigh scattering affects shorter wavelengths more than longer ones.

    If there is too much scattering of a wavelength, chances are that most of it will not make it to a given observer. It'll either just wind up going off into space or being absorbed by something. During daytime, our atmosphere does this just enough to get rid of most of the ultraviolet light. The next frequency down is blue, which gets scattered enough for us to see it.

    For the sky directly above you to appear blue to you, you need some of the blue wavelengths of light to have made it to that point above you and then get scattered there. Other wavelengths need to have either been absorbed already (like UV) or not scattered much yet (like red).

    During sunsets and sunrises, the light has to pass through much more atmosphere to get to us than it does during the day. As a result, the blue light starts to meet the same fate that UV does during the day, and longer wavelengths like yellow and red are the only ones that make it to us

    So, all that is to set up that Mars has a way thinner atmosphere which does way less scattering. The sky normally looks more or less the same colour as the ground because there's so little Rayleigh scattering happening that dust kicked up by the wind dominates the colour instead. However, same rules apply as on Earth - sunset means more scattering. It's just that on Mars, that goes from UV scattering to blue, instead of blue to red.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)