top 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 67 points 9 months ago (7 children)

So every other child rapist's name gets redacted but they can't even do a scan for passwords?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    They were so busy hunting for the rapists they completely forgot about passwords......or we've got some decent folks weaponizing "incompetence"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm convinced they used AI to redact everything, and didn't double back and check them until after a particular page made headlines.

    I've seen numerous videos where they program a script to remove the 5-6 different ways "redactions" were added and they make no sense from a technical stand point, leaving me to believe that someone non-technical told AI exactly how they wanted to redact, and then put those files in their outbox.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Apparently the word “don’t” can also be found redacted.

    Because they did a regex for Don(.)T and didn’t bother to check

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    They did bother to check, they are just sloppy. It seems like it's more that one slipped through the cracks. There are plenty of unredacted "don t" in the files. Looks like they did blanket redactions of "Don T" (and other Trump related names) and then went through manually and unredacted false positives to cover their tracks. But they missed one. It's still a smoking gun, though, as there's literally no reason to redact "don t".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 121 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Maybe I'm misunderstanding something because no one here has mentioned the obvious:

    Did we acquire the full unredacted set of his emails ?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There's no news on it and I have to assume it's because if that is the full unredacted email there's probably a ton of CSAM. If so it's technically illegal to own and anyone who is downloading it might be opening themselves up to arrest or legal challenges, even if they're a journalist.

    I would presume IF this is a full release of the Epstein GMail account, and IF it's not a honeypot op of some kind from CIA/IDF/SVR/whoever, and IF it's legit... then this is big. Nearly all American news orgs have been gutted though, and I doubt any billionaire that owns the news orgs would be ok with having their wealthy cohort exposed.

    Whoever might be investigating this would almost certainly keep quiet until all of their ducks are in a row because the second they publish, they're going to be arrested for CSAM. Unless they're in a country with no extradition treaty with the US. And even then they'll be subject to extraordinary rendition cause Trump don't care about US law, why would the lack of an extradition treaty stop him?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago*

    It's ridiculous that evidence of the crimes they committed is going to be used to arrest anyone who tries to uncover evidence of who committed those crimes. By ridiculous I don't mean I don't think it will happen. I think you are right about that.

    I mean, I know there are some people who would definitely do the wrong thing and that's why it needed to be released carefully to avoid this kind of mess and why normally this kind of digging would be done by the government or trusted investigators, but it's troublesome because the established power structure (regardless of party) are some of the same people who committed these crimes and we clearly can't trust them to do the right thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 9 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's insane that you're one of the only comments actually responding to the post itself. I'm starting to think Lemmy is being taken over by bots even worse than Reddit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Smaller populations make it easier to form social bubbles, I suppose. And this community in particular is focused on not liking something, so it's easy to throw out a quick "ooh, I hate thing!" To get some positive engagement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 185 points 9 months ago (20 children)

    Soooooo, reading someone's password then using it is "hacking" now?

    Yours,
    Schwim, Master Hacker

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 108 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, much of "hacking" is lamer than the movies show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Rami Malek did a decent job of making "real hacking" look cool in Mr Robot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Multiple major dictionaries seem to define computer hacking as: "to gain unauthorized access to a computer network, system, etc." or something similar. So yeah, it seems that using a password you found somewhere to access an account that isn't yours would indeed be considered "hacking."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Yes. It's also a series of felonies. Having a persons username and password does not give one permission to access the account anymore than having possession of someone's house key allows one to legally enter the home.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    There's an actual word there. Your instance is blocking it or blanking it out. Maybe you have certain words on a do not show list?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Surprised a Lemmy instance doesn't have it honestly

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    If they'd stop talking about Linux or posting furry porn for a minute they would.

    /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • Did anyone scrape and archive the contents?

  • source
  • remember the windows 7 activation key?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    The hacker should send Trump an Epstein Island invite ... the old pedo pervert may have a stroke from it.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›