I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.
Every smart person I know is using adblocking too. So is there's like a percentage of people who eats ads all day and open their wallets up?
I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.
Every smart person I know is using adblocking too. So is there's like a percentage of people who eats ads all day and open their wallets up?
I think it's different if you consider ads as a way to maintain the status quo.
Like, there's an ad I keep seeing on TV where 25 or 6 to 4 by Chicago plays as parents struggle to keep up with the parenting responsibilities of their toddlers. It's an ad for Amazon. And thank god for Amazon for being available to help these parents.
And like...everybody knows about Amazon. Nobody is going to suddenly sign up for a Prime account after seeing this ad. However, parents or expecting parents who already have Prime accounts are going to relate to the people in the ad and not even consider other options for their parenting needs.
Maybe a very specific example, and their are certainly ads just telling you to buy chicken nuggets, but I'm seeing it more and more.
Edit: Or hell, look at detergents. Do you really think Tide has innovated anything in the past 30 years?
Yeah like McD reminding you about their big Mac and fries. They know you know about it but they want to think about food because you might be slightly hungry and could eat. They are not ads but subliminal messages.
It's about being in your mind-space, even days later in the shop. Which works 50/50 on some people and not at all on the others. But that's good enough to bother all of humanity i guess.
Not once, even when I was a little kid, have I been convinced to want a product more because of an ad like that. People know about McDonald's, they know about Coca-Cola, they know about Hilton, they know about Disney+, the only real reason they have to advertise is to tell us about their new products that some of them have once in a while, or a deal of some kind. I can understand Dreamworks advertising a new movie for about a week, after that, the public probably knows. Same thing for Chick-Fil-A's new sandwiches and whatnot. But they never stop. They go for a month and a half, two even. Other brands, like Marriott, nothing's changed. We know that we can buy a hotel room and get free breakfast, we know, we'll pay for it if/when we need it, but we're not getting a room just for the "experience". These ads must be working, they've been dumping money into them for over a century at this point, maybe I'm just too autistic to understand how.
It's not about convincing people to buy the product. It's about keeping the brand in the public consciousness. For example, they want Coca-Cola to be synonymous with carbonated soft drinks, so that when you want to buy a soda, the first option you think of is Coke, and not Pepsi or some other brand.
It's very much this. They aren't trying to introduce you to this thing that's been an institution for longer then any of us have been alive. They're advertising to take up the limited realestate in our conscious minds.
If I were a crackpot theorist, which I am not but I dabble, I would say I wouldn't be surprised if ads serve as a medium of population control.
100%. Ads are just corporate propaganda. What would the public do if they didn't have their symbols shoved in their face every waking hour?
ICE is using Palantir data to target neighborhoods, which is purchased directly from "advertising" data brokers. So "advertising" is only part of the story. It's always been about creating a surveillance state, it's just not evenly distributed.
I don't think the websites all started thinking "I'll harvest data for the inevitable surveillance state"
Google actually started with great intentions and hoped to translate the data into revenue via "normal" ads
But... Dogy ass holes paid better than ads, and, like most companies, whenever they get successful/big enough, everything goes out the window in favour of profits
"Knowledge is power" is an expression at least hundreds of years old. Whether these data collectors were specifically thinking of adverts or not, they realised that this information had value, and so they collected it. I don't think we can know the true motivations of the data collectors and brokers, but we can know that there is (and always has been) a market for data.
Yeah exactly. Ultimately they became money machines, and they only exist to make more money now... Some will have willfully amoral motivations (Cambridge analytica, palantir) and others will just persue more money, regardless of the outcome of his they do it, I.E implicily amoral.
I lived in a country where people don't speak English. There's a sizable expat community of English speaking workers there. The ad targeting was so useless that I was constantly shown ads in a language I couldn't understand. This was on an Android phone where everything was set to English. With every single interaction I with any app or web page I was broadcasting the language I know, and yet they couldn't figure even that absolutely critical detail out.
This targeting was so bad that an old fashioned newspaper ad printed in ink next to a story would have been more effective. At least a publisher is going to put English ads in an English newspaper, German ads in a German newspaper, etc.
If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.
when i used apps with targeted ads, amongst generic type of stuff i also used to get two polar opposites of ads:
ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, want to learn english?
ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, we can help you get your immigration papers for legal employment
both at the same time btw. apparently being a polish national who speaks english fluently marked me as some sort of ad-anomaly
the ads also believed that i was a senior? at some point i even got a spam call inviting me to join a study on back pain T–T like bro you're at least 10 years early, relax
Was ad number 2 about how to get immigration papers as an English-speaking person in Poland? I imagine Poland doesn't have a lot of immigration from people in English-speaking countries. Especially not from people who haven't figure out all the legalities necessary to gain employment in Poland.
i mean, the ad was in english so kinda? i never clicked on them so i can't say for sure
though don't forget that a person who speaks english doesn't have to be from an english speaking country. most people who want to travel/live abroad will know at least some english
If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.
Sorry but this is the wrong takeaway here. They are so incredibly good at segmenting and profiling their audiences, they just don't really give a fuck about serving good ads (or any other service for that matter) anymore. Cambridge Analytica anyone?
i think advertising purposes are just a front. They use it for something, but ads is just an afterthought/excuse for public.
They were the seed that started the surveillance machine, but you're completely right nowadays the real ""value"" is elsewhere
I mean microtargetting the ads would mean they'd get less ad revenue. I think the big ones are
A) they use the data to evaluate markets and target new markets.
B) they sell it to police/intelligence agencies to fluff up their sales with bigger data numbers even though some of the data is "likes popcorn" and "bought a spoon off amazon"
C) corporate espionage type stuff, you collect info on a lot of people but then ID your main competitors or detractors to read their chat logs.
Welcome to the torment nexus brought you by carls jr
I find it so funny how I use Spotify daily*, and the account is linked** to my google account that I use a lot, and in the past I made sure to downvote any ads that don’t fit my interests at all, so basically giving as much aminition to give some good targeted ads to me.
Turns out, after all that, I get rubbish collection ads, face mask ads and wastewater management ads, even though I have truly never thought about any of those nor have shown interest in them, AND I’ve shown tons of interest in only technology.
Asterisks
(*) - I use the iOS mobile app, so I can’t really block ads unfortunately, even though I’d love to :/
(**) - I made the google and Spotify accounts when I was in my early teens, so I didn’t really know or care about digital footprint or tracking, so if I was able to go back, I would’ve at the very least gotten multiple google accounts to sandbox my activities. But hey, better late than never I guess!
I have a similar account for everything that I expect to have some form of tracking. Yet all of these services that are supposed to spy on me to find out exactly what I'm interested in have not once succeeded in targeted me with advertising for something I have any interest in getting. I've only seen them work for people who have Facebook or something that actively listens for things to make ads about, which I don't have.
At one point, the advertising algorithm for Tinder decided what I needed in my life was a tractor. A massive, eleven tonne tractor intended for work on a large farm.
It probably wouldn't fit up my driveway.
I think it was proctor gamble that zeroed out their $200 million yearly adtech spend and saw zero impact to their sales from it. There's a good possibility we're making everything terrible just so that Zuckerberg and friends can keep getting richer to nobody else's actual benefit.
Yeah, I dare say there's companies that benefit from it, but P&G is one of those companies that exist purely on creatures of habit buying the same big branded boxes every month, because they haven't fallen quite far enough in life to consider supermarket-brand products.
In much the same way as nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, no clueless husband ever got told off for bringing home P&G branded fanny pads.
I have friends who don't use adblockers (!) but I have never heard anyone say that they bought something they saw in an ad.
I will admit I have looked into products (not clicked-through) shown in apps where ads were targeted and fed in, and couldn’t be bypassed in a simple way (e.g. instagram). It’s how I eventually found a decent mattress. But this is a 1 in a million instance given how many ads they show.
Do you mean specifically from online advertising? Because unless they live in an impoverished country and never buy commercially purchased products they almost certainly have purchased something they’ve seen in an ad. Many people think they aren’t influenced by advertising, because they haven’t seen an ad for Coca-Cola and then immediately gone out and purchased a bottle of Coke, but advertising can be very influential in subtle ways that many people don’t even notice.
Obviously I mean no one has gone oh I saw x in an ad on Facebook and went to buy it and not I bought a Coca Cola.
I, for one, specifically go out of my way to not purchase things that have been advertised to me, but I also only see about one ad per year on average, because ads are a known malware vector and not blocking ads is just bad security hygiene. Not having to constantly be force-fed capitalism slop is just a nice side benefit.
But yeah, my particular 'tism mostly manifests as spite in this case, and from what I've heard tell from other Lemmings I'm in pretty good company in that regard with this group. We just need to figure out how to export that spite to the common man.
I too have autism, and I have this same response of spite towards advertizers.
I am reluctant to buy or use things that are advertized to me, ads lower my opinion of a product by a lot. I cringe at products/brands that advertize. A good product would not aggressively try to make me want it; doing so is a vile deed. It's abuse of people and should qualify as a human rights violation (we need way more recognized human rights).
I aggressively block ads, so I almost exclusively see yt sponsorships, and my response to those is "ew". "Ew a proprietary VPN" "Ew mobile game"
A targeted ad consists of showing you what you just bought from the same exact website you just got it from.
Like, it's just a scam towards the businesses at this point and a waste of my time and bandwidth.
Amazon: I see you just bought one coat rack; would you like to start your coat rack collection with these other coat racks?
Facebook is the same : "Oh I see you're married! Do you want to befriend other hot women? Let us introduce you!"
I mean I think that it does work on most people. I have a few people in my life who just don't block ads. Some of them do not even change their radio frequency when ads play through it. They think that they can choose for it to not affect them, but that's not really how propaganda works.
Just think how many people started making sourdough bread during covid lockdowns. That may not have been intentional advertising, just a few people starting a thing & then it was everywhere, and so many people who'd never cooked a day in their life became obsessed with sourdough bread. Advertising fills in the blank when you say, "Fuck it, let's just _____"
There was a small window around 2010 when Google's targeted Ads is actually kinda good (which is to say, not annoying and somewhat relevant).
Then everything enshittified.
top 87 comments