top 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 168 points 9 months ago (41 children)

I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.

Every smart person I know is using adblocking too. So is there's like a percentage of people who eats ads all day and open their wallets up?

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 159 points 9 months ago (18 children)

    Yes, most people. Adblockers are used by a minority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    An unfortunate truth.

    Some people justify it by stating that they keep ads because they want to support the websites, but don't know that at the very least they should be blocking trackers and 3rd party cookies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Even then the proper way to do that would be to Adblock and then whitelist sites you support and know don’t have turbo intrusive ads

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Yeah that's what I do, but if they don't know about adblock, they're not gonna know about that.

    Same thing on every other creative platform. People don't know that it's much better off for the creators to receive support in buying merch or patreon than it is for them to get a small fraction of what YouTube makes in ad revenue

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    they want to support the websites

    Are these people actually clicking on the ads and making purchases through them? Because if all they’re doing is letting the ads clutter space, but not interacting with them, does that really support the site at all?

    Someone on here some weeks ago had a beef with me saying I skip passed promo content in YouTube videos. They said something about wanting to support the videomakers. K, but if I’m not in the market for a new mattress (as an example of an ad I sometimes hear), it doesn’t make sense for me to listen to the sponsored mattress read-through. If I don’t make a purchase with the YouTuber’s promo code, then what’s the difference if I skip a couple minutes ahead? Do I owe a video “respect” by listening anyway? And if for some reason the advertiser cares more about me listening to their spiel than about me actually making a purchase, well, that’s silly and sucks for them.

    There are some things advertised that I’m never going to buy no matter how much they’re shown to me. Meal kits, gambling sites, men’s boxers, these are all things I’ve seen countless sponsored ad placements mid-video for, and they are all things I don’t use and can’t see myself using. Yet the ads persist.

    So I will continue skipping.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Are these people actually clicking on the ads and making purchases through them? Because if all they’re doing is letting the ads clutter space, but not interacting with them, does that really support the site at all?

    For the most part, no, it doesn't support the site, since most Google ads are PPC (Pay-Per-Click).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Sure but the metrics that companies produce after running an ad campaign to see if it was effective do not depend on those pay per click metrics. They will generally look at what the total sales or total amount of engagement with their content was pre and post the marketing campaign. If the number goes up they call it a success and will pay for another ad campaign. I guess the real question is are ad payouts for sites hosting them still generally based on pay per click or other engagement analytics that run after the campaigns are finished. That I am unsure of

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    There's plenty, with a bit of doing. Definitely not as easy as installing ublock through a browser extension store but very doable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 9 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Firefox on android can just install extensions. No clue about the iphone. I remember some chromium browsers also having extensions on Android but I'm not 100% sure which ones.

    There's also DNS blocking of ads which can be set in your DNS settings or be part of your VPN connection. This will effectively block all ads too (even embedded ones in apps). On android ofc, yet again no clue about apple.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)
    • uBlock Origin Lite on Apple App Store (pretty new): https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ublock-origin-lite/id6745342698

    • uBlock Origin for Firefox on Android: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/ublock-origin/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Oop yeah! Limited success with AdGuard (paid), or self-hosted PiHole. Should be less than less effective as time goes on because apps can serve ads from first party domains, I imagine.

    Does work for some apps though; might require manual filter list updating (open AdGuard & tap refresh) given advertiser cat-and-mouse.

    (Edit: speaking at least to iOS^)

    Edit: Apple protecting their business interests by locking the platform down for sure. Also a few fewer grandma iPhones in botnets, but at great cost to us nerds.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

    They absolutely are. Everything I got from my family this past Christmas was slop from the TikTok shop. They just clicked the first ad they saw and bought whatever. I even got two of the same item because my brother didn't realize he clicked two ads for the same thing. I've been calling it Dropshipmas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    You think that's an obscene amount of money? The intermediary services that collect, collate, aggregate, etc. that same data in the first place before selling it to companies like your employer? That's where the insane money is. That's the long game. 🤢🥲

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Middlemen make the most money of any profession.

    Market Makers. Insurance. Everyone involved in the mortgage world. Research publications. Mid-level managers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I showed my sister ad block and she was like why would i want to block ads. She said she has her algo dialed in and the ads just show her products she probably wants to buy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    as i have commented on another thing:

    💀

    “compliant consumer” is a mental illness

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Understand that we in the minority position here and the "compliant consumers" are intelligent humans making just as many choices and trade offs with different values, skills and priorities just as we are doing.

    I think there is a solid argument to make for both sides since the issue is morally relative and only one side has a working solution. I could never support it but i can see why others do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I'm going to push back on this. The experiments that had scientific rigor shown that broad ads were only marginally less effective then personalized ones while being way cheeper.

    A lot of what you see may be attributing conversion to sales that would happen anyway. Classic examples would be do you use branded search keyowords? Off course you do, despite the body of evidence that it only cannibalize the organic search.

    But there are other much more complex mehanics in play. Each sestem takes away more and more control to replace it with "autootymization", so you truly have no idea to whom and when your ads is shown. Exact keywords are broader then broad "back in a day". Who knows how google is mixing your ad components, an now AI will dynamically change the ad content and placement using unknown criteria. All this to obscure that what we do is advertisal (?) equivalent showing a pizza ad to people who finished giving their order to the waiter.

    Measurable online was here to save us from ineffective offline. Big data was here to save us from innefectove CPC. Algorithms were here to save us from paralism of to much data and now AI is here to save us from all this producing mostly a negative ROI anyway.

    I honestly belive we were in the middle of a massive online advertising bubble, that we manage to cover up with even bigger AI bubble.

    We are fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I work in this space and I'm appalled at how much targeted ads make my company.

    And here is the hint (with the fencepost) that it might be more wishful thinking on the customers side (the companies renting the service). Similiar to the AI slop bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I was at Costco with my roommate this last weekend looking at coffee. They went straight for one saying they liked the design on the packaging. I asked if they were going to buy coffee based solely on how the packaging looks. They said “Yeah, that’s how advertising works.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    We're on a decentralized message board that praises Linux and Self Hosting. We're not the target market for this stuff. My mother-in-law? She buys every damn Alibaba drop shipped trinket that promises whatever from a Facebook ad. My wife is constantly suckered into stuff advertised on Instagram.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (11 children)

    I think it's different if you consider ads as a way to maintain the status quo.

    Like, there's an ad I keep seeing on TV where 25 or 6 to 4 by Chicago plays as parents struggle to keep up with the parenting responsibilities of their toddlers. It's an ad for Amazon. And thank god for Amazon for being available to help these parents.

    And like...everybody knows about Amazon. Nobody is going to suddenly sign up for a Prime account after seeing this ad. However, parents or expecting parents who already have Prime accounts are going to relate to the people in the ad and not even consider other options for their parenting needs.

    Maybe a very specific example, and their are certainly ads just telling you to buy chicken nuggets, but I'm seeing it more and more.

    Edit: Or hell, look at detergents. Do you really think Tide has innovated anything in the past 30 years?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 9 months ago

    Yeah like McD reminding you about their big Mac and fries. They know you know about it but they want to think about food because you might be slightly hungry and could eat. They are not ads but subliminal messages.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's about being in your mind-space, even days later in the shop. Which works 50/50 on some people and not at all on the others. But that's good enough to bother all of humanity i guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Not once, even when I was a little kid, have I been convinced to want a product more because of an ad like that. People know about McDonald's, they know about Coca-Cola, they know about Hilton, they know about Disney+, the only real reason they have to advertise is to tell us about their new products that some of them have once in a while, or a deal of some kind. I can understand Dreamworks advertising a new movie for about a week, after that, the public probably knows. Same thing for Chick-Fil-A's new sandwiches and whatnot. But they never stop. They go for a month and a half, two even. Other brands, like Marriott, nothing's changed. We know that we can buy a hotel room and get free breakfast, we know, we'll pay for it if/when we need it, but we're not getting a room just for the "experience". These ads must be working, they've been dumping money into them for over a century at this point, maybe I'm just too autistic to understand how.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    It's not about convincing people to buy the product. It's about keeping the brand in the public consciousness. For example, they want Coca-Cola to be synonymous with carbonated soft drinks, so that when you want to buy a soda, the first option you think of is Coke, and not Pepsi or some other brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's very much this. They aren't trying to introduce you to this thing that's been an institution for longer then any of us have been alive. They're advertising to take up the limited realestate in our conscious minds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    100%. Ads are just corporate propaganda. What would the public do if they didn't have their symbols shoved in their face every waking hour?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    ICE is using Palantir data to target neighborhoods, which is purchased directly from "advertising" data brokers. So "advertising" is only part of the story. It's always been about creating a surveillance state, it's just not evenly distributed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think the websites all started thinking "I'll harvest data for the inevitable surveillance state"

    Google actually started with great intentions and hoped to translate the data into revenue via "normal" ads

    But... Dogy ass holes paid better than ads, and, like most companies, whenever they get successful/big enough, everything goes out the window in favour of profits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    "Knowledge is power" is an expression at least hundreds of years old. Whether these data collectors were specifically thinking of adverts or not, they realised that this information had value, and so they collected it. I don't think we can know the true motivations of the data collectors and brokers, but we can know that there is (and always has been) a market for data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yeah exactly. Ultimately they became money machines, and they only exist to make more money now... Some will have willfully amoral motivations (Cambridge analytica, palantir) and others will just persue more money, regardless of the outcome of his they do it, I.E implicily amoral.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    I lived in a country where people don't speak English. There's a sizable expat community of English speaking workers there. The ad targeting was so useless that I was constantly shown ads in a language I couldn't understand. This was on an Android phone where everything was set to English. With every single interaction I with any app or web page I was broadcasting the language I know, and yet they couldn't figure even that absolutely critical detail out.

    This targeting was so bad that an old fashioned newspaper ad printed in ink next to a story would have been more effective. At least a publisher is going to put English ads in an English newspaper, German ads in a German newspaper, etc.

    If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    when i used apps with targeted ads, amongst generic type of stuff i also used to get two polar opposites of ads:

    1. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, want to learn english?

    2. ah, we see you're in poland and use english a lot, we can help you get your immigration papers for legal employment

    both at the same time btw. apparently being a polish national who speaks english fluently marked me as some sort of ad-anomaly

    the ads also believed that i was a senior? at some point i even got a spam call inviting me to join a study on back pain T–T like bro you're at least 10 years early, relax

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Was ad number 2 about how to get immigration papers as an English-speaking person in Poland? I imagine Poland doesn't have a lot of immigration from people in English-speaking countries. Especially not from people who haven't figure out all the legalities necessary to gain employment in Poland.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    If the ad companies can't even figure out the language(s) that their targets understand, their knowledge of their target must be essentially zero.

    Sorry but this is the wrong takeaway here. They are so incredibly good at segmenting and profiling their audiences, they just don't really give a fuck about serving good ads (or any other service for that matter) anymore. Cambridge Analytica anyone?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    i think advertising purposes are just a front. They use it for something, but ads is just an afterthought/excuse for public.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I mean microtargetting the ads would mean they'd get less ad revenue. I think the big ones are

    A) they use the data to evaluate markets and target new markets.

    B) they sell it to police/intelligence agencies to fluff up their sales with bigger data numbers even though some of the data is "likes popcorn" and "bought a spoon off amazon"

    C) corporate espionage type stuff, you collect info on a lot of people but then ID your main competitors or detractors to read their chat logs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Welcome to the torment nexus brought you by carls jr

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I find it so funny how I use Spotify daily*, and the account is linked** to my google account that I use a lot, and in the past I made sure to downvote any ads that don’t fit my interests at all, so basically giving as much aminition to give some good targeted ads to me.

    Turns out, after all that, I get rubbish collection ads, face mask ads and wastewater management ads, even though I have truly never thought about any of those nor have shown interest in them, AND I’ve shown tons of interest in only technology.

    Asterisks(*) - I use the iOS mobile app, so I can’t really block ads unfortunately, even though I’d love to :/

    (**) - I made the google and Spotify accounts when I was in my early teens, so I didn’t really know or care about digital footprint or tracking, so if I was able to go back, I would’ve at the very least gotten multiple google accounts to sandbox my activities. But hey, better late than never I guess!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    I have a similar account for everything that I expect to have some form of tracking. Yet all of these services that are supposed to spy on me to find out exactly what I'm interested in have not once succeeded in targeted me with advertising for something I have any interest in getting. I've only seen them work for people who have Facebook or something that actively listens for things to make ads about, which I don't have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I think it was proctor gamble that zeroed out their $200 million yearly adtech spend and saw zero impact to their sales from it. There's a good possibility we're making everything terrible just so that Zuckerberg and friends can keep getting richer to nobody else's actual benefit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Yeah, I dare say there's companies that benefit from it, but P&G is one of those companies that exist purely on creatures of habit buying the same big branded boxes every month, because they haven't fallen quite far enough in life to consider supermarket-brand products.

    In much the same way as nobody ever got fired for buying IBM, no clueless husband ever got told off for bringing home P&G branded fanny pads.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I have friends who don't use adblockers (!) but I have never heard anyone say that they bought something they saw in an ad.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I will admit I have looked into products (not clicked-through) shown in apps where ads were targeted and fed in, and couldn’t be bypassed in a simple way (e.g. instagram). It’s how I eventually found a decent mattress. But this is a 1 in a million instance given how many ads they show.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Do you mean specifically from online advertising? Because unless they live in an impoverished country and never buy commercially purchased products they almost certainly have purchased something they’ve seen in an ad. Many people think they aren’t influenced by advertising, because they haven’t seen an ad for Coca-Cola and then immediately gone out and purchased a bottle of Coke, but advertising can be very influential in subtle ways that many people don’t even notice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I, for one, specifically go out of my way to not purchase things that have been advertised to me, but I also only see about one ad per year on average, because ads are a known malware vector and not blocking ads is just bad security hygiene. Not having to constantly be force-fed capitalism slop is just a nice side benefit.

    But yeah, my particular 'tism mostly manifests as spite in this case, and from what I've heard tell from other Lemmings I'm in pretty good company in that regard with this group. We just need to figure out how to export that spite to the common man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I too have autism, and I have this same response of spite towards advertizers.

    I am reluctant to buy or use things that are advertized to me, ads lower my opinion of a product by a lot. I cringe at products/brands that advertize. A good product would not aggressively try to make me want it; doing so is a vile deed. It's abuse of people and should qualify as a human rights violation (we need way more recognized human rights).

    I aggressively block ads, so I almost exclusively see yt sponsorships, and my response to those is "ew". "Ew a proprietary VPN" "Ew mobile game"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    A targeted ad consists of showing you what you just bought from the same exact website you just got it from.

    Like, it's just a scam towards the businesses at this point and a waste of my time and bandwidth.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I mean I think that it does work on most people. I have a few people in my life who just don't block ads. Some of them do not even change their radio frequency when ads play through it. They think that they can choose for it to not affect them, but that's not really how propaganda works.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    Just think how many people started making sourdough bread during covid lockdowns. That may not have been intentional advertising, just a few people starting a thing & then it was everywhere, and so many people who'd never cooked a day in their life became obsessed with sourdough bread. Advertising fills in the blank when you say, "Fuck it, let's just _____"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    There was a small window around 2010 when Google's targeted Ads is actually kinda good (which is to say, not annoying and somewhat relevant).

    Then everything enshittified.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›