top 79 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

I believe that GenAI is a scam that should've been treated and criminalized/prosecuted like one long before it got to the point of destructiveness that it's currently at and I'll die on that hill.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I said in a meeting "that's a really bad idea"

    They still did it.

    During years, we had trouble with it. I kept saying "I told you it was a bad idea".

    After 6 years, they finally removed it. I said "well, I said it was a bad idea".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (9 children)

    They tried to argue that all math was useless bullshit because it couldn't deal with infinity.

    I tried to show different ways math has been useful for me personally, and for humanity generally. None of that mattered to them. I tried to explain how math can actually work with infinity. They insisted I was lying.

    A part of me thought they were just trying to troll me, but after seeing and interacting with them multiple times afterwards, I'm pretty sure those were their genuine beliefs. They were also a moon landing denier, but after the whole math discussion I didn't touch that topic with a ten foot pole.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    JFC don't send them stopdoingmath.jpeg

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I now consider it one of many examples of the idea that you can't use reason and evidence to change someone's beliefs, if they never used reason or evidence to conclude those beliefs in the first place.

    I feel sorry for those who have never felt the excitement of changing their beliefs based on new evidence or understanding, especially when due to their own hubris. Being wrong is an opportunity to learn and discover. Everyone who has ever lived, and will ever live, is sometimes wrong.

    In a way, that's the general theme of this thread. We stood our ground when we knew we were right and could prove it with reason and evidence, while facing opposition that was based on stubbornness, hubris, and refusal to admit to being wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I feel sorry for those who have never felt the excitement of changing their beliefs based on new evidence or understanding, especially when due to their own hubris.

    Not only is it sad, nearly everything wrong with the world right now can be boiled down to a handful of people having this character flaw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    You can't even prove numbers are real!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I was once a consultant for wine companies. I was working on helping establish a new wine brand. The client was really clear that they did not want to rely on the idea of terroir, nor their vineyards closeness to the ocean as selling points.

    My boss thought the brand should use a bunch sails and anchor imagery to sell the terroir and the vineyard's closeness to the ocean.

    I told him the client wouldn't like it as they'd been clear that's not what they wanted. He said I was wrong. If he'd told me the client was wrong that would have been fine but he insisted that I had heard it wrong and started gas lighting me.

    Turns out the client felt they'd been really clear that they didn't want a brand that focused on the terroir and closeness to the ocean and refused to pay for that round of work.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago*

    I have to be "that guy" sometimes when it comes to fire performance safety. There's huge risks involved so there really isn't a lot of wiggle room. I try to treat any fuckups as learning opportunities though, I don't want to scare away the newbies

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, we had a tooling design and it was going to fail because the angles and mechanisms were not right. My boss overruled me, under protest, and we built it how the customer wanted it with no changes.

    It failed in production.

    There was a big meeting with everyone upset. I said I told you! And tried to reexplain why it doesnt work. They denied knowing about the issues previously.

    Thankfully the president stepped in and said, I was in the initial meeting and remember you warning of the potential failure. Then everyone shut up.

    We redid everything my way.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Sounds like an awesome president.

    I have the same story (with a huge failure at a metal factory) that I had a dozen times made a big scene about how terrible an idea it was. The corporate guy who suggested it decided to email god and country that if only (my team specifically of) engineering had supported us more it wouldn't have happened like that. I was fuming, spent half the night furiously detailing and outlining my proof of how we supported him, bad idea, etc.

    I ended up drunkenly scrapping the entire write up and just reply alling "fuck you (name)". Perhaps my proudest work moment, tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago

    yeah I'm autistic this happens very often

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    That smart phones are surveillance/psyop devices, and that they own you, not them. I've been 100% phone free for 5 years now. I'm a 30+ Year IT expert. Also, fuck A.I.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    100% phone free or 100% smartphone free? Thats wild

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    ALL: I don't own a smartphone, dumb cellphone, landline, or anything else. I don't own a tablet either.

    I only use my computer without any camera's, microphones or other feedback systems that social media can use to listen in or watch what my eye is focused on. I limit my online time to less than 2 hours a day, and often go several days without it at all.

    I do have a media player that uses yt-dlp too download a few youtube channels I like, but with all the ads and whatnot removed. It's as anonymous as I can get to limit what big tech knows I've consumed. Censorship and book burning start by knowing the source of the offending information.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Ive thought about going smartphone free, but I literally need it for a lot of 2fa stuff and travel.

    However, all I do on it is, read, read lemmy, and talk to friends. Sometimes play nethack. Im not on toxic social media. So other than being on lemmy a little too much, I dont think its a bad thing to have, minus all the spyware, which I hope to get a pixel or light phone someday to rid that.

    What I do think is good and needed more is respecting it. I dont need to be on it when im with friends. I dont need to look at it first thing in the morning. I dont need it when im in public and could sit contently or talk to a neighbor. Usually on weekends I leave it in my sock drawer and check it once or twice (unless i just need it for 2fa)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I'm a structural engineer. It is part of the job.

    I've been mostly right.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Climate change is real and damaging to everyone and we need to take action to mitigate its progression. People who deny it are just insane. Not sure why some folks think losing freshwater and having more extreme weather events isn't a problem but it will end human civilization as we know it and eventually our species as a whole. We need to get with the program and stop politicizing a global issue.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Playing noise on your phone in a public place is wrong. Violators should be put in one those midevil contraptions that lock your head and wrists in a plank of wood so that we may all pelt you with rotten fruit and vegetables.

    No one wants to hear that shit. You're an asshole and should feel bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's cheese curds and gravy that make it a poutine, not cheese. You can put cheese AND cheese curds on a poutine along with other stuff, but without cheese curds, all you have is fries and gravy with assorted hangers on.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    This is correct. I used to live in southern US and could not find any place that served even something similar to poutine much less actual poutine with cheese curds. Youd think they would be more into that stuff its got fried stuff, gravy and whatnot

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    From watching the commercial, I had an immediate revulsion to the Lunesta sleep aid because of the green moths that would fly in through your window and land on you and you would fall into a beautiful peaceful sleep.

    I had friends and family that took it and they said it was the only sleep aid that worked for them and that I was being irrational.

    And then it came out that people would take the shit and then sleepwalk and go for drives and wake up in their underwear out in the middle of the fucking woods because the Lunesta sleep moth had taken over them and made them do all kinds of crazy shit.

    https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-risk-serious-injuries-caused-sleepwalking-certain-prescription-insomnia

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Ok, but you're still being irrational... Their advertising choices are not at all related to real life side effects of the drug. The moth was probably thought up by an overworked, unpaid intern during a brainstorming session.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    Oh my ex wanted me to cut his hair, but just pulled it over one shoulder and said cut it off. He wanted to see it cut, understand? No, neither did i. I said "no, it will be slanty because it's all pulled to one side, let me cut it into a haircut." He said no, it will be fine, just cut it. "It will be slanty!" He was getting mad, JUST CUT IT! Finally he just took scissors and cut it how he wanted. "Oh no, it's all slanty!"

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    If you're walking down stairs or an escalator you stand/walk on the right. always. If you live in a country that drives on the left side then you apply the same to stairs.

    When walking on the sidewalk you pass on the right.

    People who walk down the opposite side are a cancer to society.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Fun fact, in Japan, they drive on the left. As a result, they also walk on the left on the sidewalk. However in Osaka, they walk up stairs and use escalators "international style" on the right. They still walk on sidewalks on the left side. The rest of the country is not like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    It's so fucking bad. Always has been. And coming on directly after Seinfeld only highlighted how supremely unfunny the show was.

    I honestly judge people irl who tell me they think Friends is funny. I honestly cannot stop myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Nobody likes candy corn and anyone who does is trying to gaslight me personally

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I love candy corn. I like sticking it onto my front upper incisors like I'm some weird harvest vampire. Yes I'm an adult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I like two to seven pieces of candy corn a year. After that it's too much and I can't take it anymore, but every year the counter resets and I don't know how many I'm going to get to eat before I'm sick of them again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I like a small handful a day while it's seasonal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I liked candycorn till one of my kids made a bunch of it at home and pointed out the layers are just food colour and not a different flavour ingredient etc. The facade was ruined.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pizza that traditionally comes with sauce on top would be better if you did no sauce on top and instead dipped the pizza in sauce as you ate. I like my crunchy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Random programming one, but some of the changes in C++20 are terrible and do not belong in the language. I will die on the hill of just because something is easier to learn/work with doesn't make it better.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago

    Yes. OS Security. A bunch of "don't do that or you'll learn why" stuff.

    Have I been right on all of my positions? Not yet.

    Yet.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago* (8 children)

    I think having pets is fundamentally unethical. Your dog lives in a tiny fraction of the world with absolutely no agency and only “loves” you because it is literally programmed to after centuries of breeding for traits that promote that. Your pet did not choose you and if it “loves” you at all, it’s only because they are utterly dependent on you because they have been taken far from where their species can survive or that place has been ruined by humanity. Animals cannot consent period and by extension cannot and never do consent to being property.

    I’m not a PETA freak. I don’t shame people for having pets, but I’m unable to think of pets without considering these facts and it makes the entire thing seem gross and wrong to me. I rarely bring it up because it never leads to an engaging or productive conversation. No one ever really has an argument against it besides something along the lines of “Humans have had pets for millennia” or “It’s too late to put them back” which don’t actually prove me wrong in any way.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago

    Domestication is interesting because your average German shepherd is arguably living a significantly higher quality of life than a wolf living in the wild. While they may not have the same "freedom" as a wolf living in the woods, the wolf lives in its own shackles, always fighting for food, shelter and protection from predators. While I don't disagree that having pets is fundamentally a problematic concept, I also think its always a bad idea to attribute abstract human traits and concepts onto animals, most of which want food, water, safe territory, and engagement.

    Almost every animal specialist I talked to never talks about animals as if they were people, they always have a sense of respect for them being an animal and of a different species. I suppose they have a greater understanding of what an animal "wants".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    The second part of the question was were you right, and I think you're probably wrong most of the time on your stance, but there are definitely areas where you are correct.

    My argument would be that even though many of these pets have ingrained psychosocial issues that make them more amenable to being owned as pets, the counterpoint is, is there is no fundamental and absolute right way to live.

    If there's a tiny little section where people and animals can be happy, then there's nothing wrong with that happiness.

    Blaming someone for not taking the entirety of the universe into account for something that gave them happiness is generally considered a dick move.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I’m not really blaming anyone. It’s a complicated idea. I don’t expect every person to philosophize about the problem. Ultimately I’m just one person who gets uncomfortable when I consider what a pets life really is. It’s not a high priority to me and I don’t get preachy about it. There are more pressing issues in the world to me.

    To your point of an “absolutely right way to live”, I agree, but my belief is that living things should ideally have the freedom to choose how they want to live rather than someone assert their personal opinion of the correct way to live. Pets however have absolutely no freedom to choose how to live. They don’t choose their owners nor the conditions they live in nor can they truly do anything about how they are treated.

    The fact that they are (sometimes) happy makes it an easier pill to swallow except for the fact that their happiness comes largely from a variety of factors that limit their perspective. That’s not even considering the unknowable number of mistreated pets there are or innocent creatures that lived entire lives of misery and abuse due to uncaring owners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Yours is a fascinating perspective that I haven't considered before.

    My "shooting from the hip" response is to consider the life of an animal in a 2x2 grid. The first column is pets, the second column is non-pets (i.e. Animals living in the wild). The first row is animals with sufficient access to food, shelter, and overall wellbeing. The second row is animals without those needs being met (i.e. Suffering under the hands of either humans or nature).

    In my opinion, based on my personal life experience, and only if you consider the animals that are not typically used for food (that's an entirely different, but also important discussion), the number of animals in the top left quadrant are second only to the number of animals in the bottom right. Because of this, I believe that the concept of pet ownership is an overall net positive.

    That still absolutely does rob the pet of the free will to decide their own destiny, and that is still absolutely a moral quandary.

    Edit: Another way to frame my opinion that pets are a net positive is that we humans have done a great deal to improve our general quality of life (for better or worse to the world at large), and have mostly brought our pets up to a similar quality with us. Food, water, and shelter are usually provided to pets at a minimum, but those are anything but guaranteed in the wild. Pets lives also greatly improve compared to wild animals if you consider modern heating and cooling, pet friendly dietary considerations, veterinary care, and an overall pet friendly society.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I mean you can make the same argument for many humans, we as children don't choose where we are born and who are our parents. And each country and society will decide for them the "correct" way to live. If anything, you could say we are currently treating tiny humans as pets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    if it makes you feel better, there are different ways to take care of a pet (or companion animal if you prefer that term)

    my dogs (**my **as in they are under my care, like children) don't know tricks, they are free to perform any behavior that doesn't put them or any other animal in danger

    around me they are free to keep doing whatever they want or ask to be pet, the only orders I give them is to sit down and stay still when I give them treats so they don't start a fight over it and to move from one part of my yard to another when we need to move heavy stuff

    whenever the capitalist system let's me keep enough energy after my chores I take them out for walks but when that's not the case I play with them in my yard

    I respect and love them in that way

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Happens often and most of the times is it because of a misunderstanding. Usually we actually agree with each other but we think we are disagreeing and arguing about how the thing we agree on is correct. I have seen this happen with two coworker many times and it makes me laugh every time until it gets too serious. I actually had this kind of "discussion" yesterday, my coworker said he couldn't see change x in my PR and I told him how it was before and how it is after the change and then it became heated (I assume it is because he wrote the code and the tests) he stepped back when I told him even the tests expected the faulty state then he understood what outcome we needed and saw that the change was there and it was actually correct.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Bigotry is bad. Segregation is bad.

    In progressive spaces this is USUALLY met with agreement. That's easy whenever we are talking about equal rights for people who have been historically been oppressed. However, a dark corner of progressive spaces likes to hate. Hate on men, cis people, white people. It's usually just one or two people, who have probably been personally hurt by people who happen to fall into those groups, and the rest don't feel like they can say anything.

    I strongly believe that things like segregation are fundamentally wrong and make the world a worse place. Not that they were tools that were used for evil and can now be used for good in the right hands. Not just temporarily as balancing measures for society. Equality isn't just something you can pick and choose when to believe in, when it's pretty and convenient and makes you feel good.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Yes, and yes.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›