Based. Codebase denies AI generated contributions.

I didn't know Chinese Wikipedia existed

Do the cops not have access to the registration records on a digital system?

If you're building a game from start to finish in a game engine written in c++, you'll probably end up having to touch some c++ eventually. Better to learn that, than only ever learning a scripting language.

Always thought I was a weirdo for adding more milk per milk in my cereal as a kid but I'm glad I'm not the only one. Respect to all my milk brothers.

What if there's more than two Trevors?

Just cause 2. Bought a physical copy and was confused why I needed an internet connection.

I haven't used my all apps screen in months. I just use a search based home screen. My home screen is just a clock and weather widget.

There are plenty of games using Midjourney to generate textures which are then heavily modified to look less AI generated. Should they opt to not disclose their ai usage?

Lying to your customers and audience about how your game was made is fucked up and I don't plan on supporting developers who do this.

They updated their guidelines explicitly to say this.

I think the forced distinction between ai code and GenAI art is harmful because it is meant to shallowly appease the anti ai crowd while also demeaning the act of writing software as not art and not representative of the artistic value of a video game, which I strongly disagree with.

My issue is that it's misleading

You can advertise your game as no AI on steam despite heavily using it for everything that makes the game a game. I don't just buy games because they're fun I buy games to support a developer. I'd rather support a developer that still places value on the craft of game development.

The ai tag is only required for assets made with ai. You can vibe code your entire game and as long as the assets weren't ai generated you don't have to disclose AI usage.