top 76 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 136 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Close another studio? Cancel some more games? That's the best way to make more money, right? Lay everyone off and stop making products?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    I do think they should actually downsize. Stop pushing out a new Assassins Creed every year or 2. Reduce the magnitude of the games a bit. First few Assassins Creeds were special. Far Cry games used to be great too. Now they just feel like a grindfest. As do the AC games.

    But I don't think Ubisoft leadership would be capable of doing it right. They'd probably just lay off everyone who actually does work, and expect a similar amount of games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    There are industries where that works. In business software, that's incredibly common, in part because people buy the same software every year, or on a subscription. So the company makes a half decent product, hires an insane amount of people to market it while firing the vast majority of the developers, sells a ton of subscriptions, then coasts for a decade or two. Any time a competitor starts forming, buy them, lay off the staff, and coast on that too.

    It's the business model of the vast majority of business to business software/service products out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago

    Cool, that sounds exactly like how people want game companies to run. Just make a subscription based game, fire a bunch of people that actually made the product, and kill any innovative competition!

    Doesn't sound fucking deplorable at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Any time a competitor starts forming, buy them, lay off the staff, and coast on that too.

    Hey! Don't go calling Norton out like that, man

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Those are good ideas, but their advisors will probably have them take out a massive loan and use it to buy another game studio, then lay off the staff at that game studio, to briefly appear profitable, before crashing into bankruptcy to be bought by Microsoft.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 9 months ago

    Ubisoft will own nothing, and we will be happy...

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    They need some fun original IP, so much of their work is derivative and rehashes of old stuff now.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Beyond that, to GET to their rehashed derivative stuff you need a separate launcher with a separate and annoying login.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    O, I forgot about that. If it isn't in Steam or Heroic, I apparently need active reminders it even exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    They are on steam!

    https://store.steampowered.com/publisher/ubisoft

    I am fairly confident they are one of the companies where when you launch the game you purchased through steam it redirects you to the ubisoft launcher like how some Microsoft games in steam prompt a xbox login. Forza Horizon 5, I'm looking at you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Not only that, but true to Ubisoft form, many Uplay DRM games still require Steam if you buy them through Steam, so you actually must have both launchers running to play, not just Ubisoft's. If you start it from Uplay (yeah, I know, it's "Ubisoft Connect" now), it will start Steam up. Steam doesn't require this--lots of Steam games don't require Steam's DRM. It's completely Ubisoft's choice to force Steam DRM on top of their own DRM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    I noped out of the Outlaws demo when I was forced to create a Ubisoft account to play.

    Whole point of console gaming is convenience.

    They obviously don't want my $60. I wonder how much they make selling the data to brokers that someone downloaded their demo and ditched it at the login screen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The fact that they have shareholders means that they’re likely to keep rehashing old stuff.

    Shareholders love “guaranteed” money, which is why movie studios keep making the same crap over and over again. It’s more stable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 41 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    What do you say Lemmy, should we all put in $20 and make an acquisition offer? The people in this thread should cover it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Current evaluation is about 720M USD I believe. At 20 USD per person, that implies there are 36M persons in this thread.

    Lemmy had gotten BIG!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago*

    Nobody deserves insolvency more than Ubisoft. They are not just greedy. They're also incompetent and delusional. They took solid gold franchises and fucked them to death.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago

    I hope Ubisoft goes belly up. Fuck them greedy dickheads. And special fuck you’s to the Trump family and the Saudis.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    Turns out making games just to please shareholders doesn't make sales?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago

    Meh. Their games are mediocre at best and the bullshit they attach to playing a game makes it totally not worth bothering to give Ubisoft any money.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    The markets probably didn't like all the cancelled games in the pipeline but a reset is probably for the best. Their main franchises have gotten steadily worst. I used to look forward to their games, now I don't even buy them on special.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They said they want to focus on open world and live service games, so it sounds like the ones they canceled were the actual good ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Tbh, they cancelled the prince of Persia remake. I don't think we know what the other games were. I know it's a popular franchise but I hate remakes, they always end up being a cash grab. Open world is kind of their bread and butter but it's been mostly shit, so if they focus on the quality aspect, it might turn it around.

    I don't really dig live service but r6 siege was one so maybe we can get another gem or two like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    They certainly can be cash grabs but I wouldn’t say always. Usually it’s the low effort remasters that don’t warrant rebuying at full price as they’re mostly a technical refresh (with mixed results based on how much they tried).

    Remake implies them remaking the game instead of upgrading it where you get things like the ffvii remakes or the upcoming dragon quest vii which looks pretty good. Sometimes they miss but I wouldn’t call them a cash grab as it still takes significant investment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    But this isnt what enshittification is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Its why their stock was so high and at least partially why theyve been suffering as of late. They've completely enshittified their portfolio and cant milk any more out of fed up users. They chose not to innovate content and instead found new ways to pump up numbers for short term shareholder returns.

    Im sure they haven't learned and will only innovate more ways to enshittify themselves as that is their MO.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I loved AC Shadows, a really fun game. I was surprised though, Mirage was shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    What about Mirage was shit? As much as I loved Shadows, the story kind of went nowhere towards the end. On the other hand, Mirage despite having a simple story, is the best AC game I have played in ages. That said, I've always been a fan of the original pre-RPG AC games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Good, maybe turning that $70 game into a free to play wasn’t such a good idea, eh?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Ahh ubisoft. I have known you since the 90s with classics like B.A.T. 2 The Koshan Conspiracy (a game that still looks beautiful even if i still have no fucking idea what it is about!) And... well... I dont remember what else.

    Anyway, you suck now and you can die peacefully.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Love that for them ❤️

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Far Cry 7 is rumored to add a 24-hour time limit (similar to Dead Rising's mechanic) and lean heavily into multiplayer

    It won't be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    For the uninformed what does that mean?

    Are they pulling a Nvidia - you only get 24 hours of playtime or you have to pay more - type of deal? Because fuck that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    No, it's a game mechanic where you have to accomplish a certain objective before the time ends or you lose. Hopefully it's just a rumor, because that sounds terrible for a Far Cry game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    I hate that Ubisoft have Steep and Riders Republic. Hands down my favourite snowboarding/skiing games that aren't SSX.

    I don't suppose there are any better alternatives? I much prefer the arcade style over realism. It's nice to be able to finish work and just freeride to unwind.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Descenders has mountainbiking and snowboarding

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Thanks, been looking into this and it seems there is Descenders and Descenders Next. The former is really well received but it seems Next is still quite a work in progress. The impression I get from the store page is Descenders only has mountain biking? Still looks great though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I just hope trackmania survives

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Good. Fuck any publicly held company.

  • source
  • [+] -16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I don't get why gamers are so obsessed on hating ubisoft while at the same time praising Steam. Both are evil capitalist business, the difference being that ubi employs thousands of dev while steam as sub 300 employees (while taking 30% of every game sold lol). This goes for all the major studios, no matter how much youn like or hate their games, the executive only care about money and the devs want to work on games while being paid.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Well, Valve funds Linux development and other than GOG, they run the only passable online game store. Idk if you remember, but you used to have to find a shop that stocked the game you wanted and then buy it from there. Steam and EGS have more or less everything, but since EGS is a Chrome instance running inside Unreal Engine 4, it's extremely slow. Yes, they managed to invent something worse than Electron.

    Ubisoft, on the other hand, went from creating some of the most iconic games ever made, to pumping out repetitive garbage. Any individual newish Assassin's Creed game isn't bad, but once you've played Origins, Odyssey, Valhalla... You no longer feel like buying Mirage and Shadows.

    I may be wrong, but there's sources saying Valve pays game and steam developers roughly 1 million dollars a year, hardware developers about 400k a year. Likely much of it in the form of profit sharing. They could hire 10x as many people and still be profitable, but what's the point of adding bloat to something that works? Over-hiring during good times tends not to end well for the people hired, nor the company's actual productivity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    PPL just want a good guy, steam charges the same 30% everyone does and it's why companies want their own stores/launchers, so they don't have to gove steam a cut, not crazy on their part. Steam fr started loot crates, paid mods, skin gambling, etc.

  • source
  • parent