all 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 93 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Looks like it got too creepy for its own good.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago*

    Link shorteners and redirectors, especially new and lesser-known ones tend to get caught in the fray with things like Google Safe Browsing (which FF uses as well) and Smart Screen.

    It's because the original/shortened link gets reported and not the real/destination site. Then the domain (of the shortener/redirector) gets flagged, instead of the real site.

    This happened to me at work this very week, with a redirector service that's a part of our email security stack. FF and Chrome were both blocking links that were safe, because the redirector service itself was classified as sus.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Firefox on Android doesn't even have the "ignore" option :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.

    Sketchy dark pattern ads

    Love the concept, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    Ad for an ad-blocker. Genius 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Probably the only ad ever to hit exactly and only the correct target demographic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Doubtful. If you still have ads in 2026 you never valued your own time, software, or consent anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Or maybe you like supporting creators and in general pay people for their goods and services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I support creators I like, ad revenue goes mostly to corpo and not them so I block ads, simple

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Depending on the site, TikTok takes like 80% while YouTube take less than 50%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I know, that's why I donate or buy merch/products from creators I like.

    They get more money from that than they would ever get from ad revenue, and I get a less annoying experience of what ever platform I'm using (plus minimize profit corpos make on me, that's always good).

    If what ever corpo media wanted me to allow it easier profit, if sure better grow feet and give me a happy ending, otherwise it's not gonna happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 131 points 9 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] [S] 98 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

    Cm0002:

    waltzes into chat about deceptive links

    clicks a deceptive link

    realizes they have been deceived

    Cm0002: "No, it is the person who posted the deceptive link who is wrong".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Jokes on you I saw the ad first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    3/4 of screen space filled with ads, how do you live like this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I don't use yt on my phone. I was actually interested what op put behind the link. I thought it would be a rickroll, but yk, I had to click it. I know, it hurts me too, seeing other people suffer so many ads. Also this is my newest phone and I don't have the time to spend tinkering around ad free stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 9 months ago

    alive internet theory

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Pfft, I got one with TODO_Obfuscate_URL. I wish I saved it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I totally believe this works, but there's no way I'm clicking on any of those links

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago
    [–] 12 points 9 months ago*
    [–] 11 points 9 months ago
    [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    This is so funny and useless, I love it

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    it would be quite something, if the links actually went to/through malicious sites...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It's why they have a report feature. No idea how well they moderate things tho.

    Site seems best for gags with friends.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I used to run a public link shortener. Once the scammers catch wind and add it to their rotation all bets are off. I got inundated with reports and my standing with my web host would have been at risk as well (long story). I now use Shlink on those domains lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago
    [–] 9 points 9 months ago
    [–] 7 points 9 months ago* (5 children)

    Congratulations! You've won an iPhone! Click our secure link to claim your prize! We promise this is not a Rip Off!

    https://secure.ic6do.com/tRn4TI_ip_grab

    EDIT: Please do click the link so my joke can land

    EDIT 2: Sorry I'm too much of a wimp to even happy-prank people

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    What even is the point of URL shorteners? I always understood it as a Twitter thing, but I see them more outside of Twitter.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    When sharing links with people in places where there’s a character limit or to avoid polluting visuals.

    Also, when sharing like orally or showing it to someone else when you have no other way to communicate it: ex, the link of a shared cloud file

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Infuriatingly, URL shortners are often used in QR codes because they have a character limit-ish (longer strings make for more detailed QR codes, which are harder to scan from further away so it's a trade-off). but if the QR points to a shortened link then it's more difficult to assess where a QR code is pointing without blindly following the link.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    My biggest bugbear relating to this is the lack of a short text alternative for QR codes, especially with long URLs.
    If the URL is too long to fit into a QR code, then it's also too long for me to type in manually!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I think I like an alternative that uses full words instead of a string of no sense symbols and mixed case letters.

    Something like what What 3 Words does but for short URLs. That would be easy to convey and type

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think sometimes it gives people analytics on how many people click the link when the link is to something they themselves don't control. But I'm not entirely sure if that's a common service shorteners offer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I find it handy for writing down a URL on paper

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I gotta stop trying these out. The other day something to the tune of hot-singles.xxx autofilled in my phone browser the other day and I was so confused.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    This looks like an awesome project idea to steal

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I've never understood the URL shortener idea. It's like a box of chocolates. You just never know what you're going to fudge into next.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    One benefit/reason is to make it easier to manually type in the URL. Like if it's printed on an ad or poster or something.

    Not a significant benefit anymore especially with QR codes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    Yeah I get the idea in that sense. It's just that you are putting a lot of trust in the source. But I guess that's the same with qr codes but at least you get to see the destination in your camera view.

  • source
  • parent