all 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 9 months ago (7 children)

What are you looking for, here? Posts of solidarity with the Iranian protests? Seems like you could have just made one. Be the change.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Simply pointing out how there's (rightfully!) all the righteous anger in the world when certain countries do evil, but a blatant massacre is going unremarked upon or excused because Iran is "anti-west". I was expecting more than apathetic shrugs here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago*

    You may be unaware of the americans dying in the streets. Ice murdered a baby yesterday. Americans are occupied, mentally and otherwise

    You'll also notice that palestine is still being genocided. It's the news cycle. It happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

    I’m seeing posts. I don’t know what you’re talking about. I have little respect for “where are all the posts?” posts. It’s complaining that everyone else isn’t doing it for you. Someone has to sit down and post those posts. Maybe for this, since you obviously care, it’s you. Instead you’re shitting on everyone else for not already having done it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Well, I ain't, hence this post. Fun fact: I did actually sit down and post this post, as evidenced by us posting within this post. Sorry to drive you up the post by my posting, I shall send by post a post-it note reminding me to post more post-haste.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The slaughter happens and you post about the inabundance of posts and therefore contribute to...what, exactly? Curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    If I posted a post about not posting enough posts, does this post not add to the posted total of posts? Call or post your representatives, no need to shove me against the post for posting a post about the lack of posts!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Touché, but remember your post only contributes to the not posted enough total of posts and not to the posts that the post posts about so the total posts that the post posts about remains posted at the same total, while the posts about the lack of total posts about what the post posts about only posts about something that seems to post about lack of posts but for what reason?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 9 months ago (9 children)

    Sorry. What am I supposed to be doing?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] [S] -11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

    Mentioning it? This site is surprisingly a ghost town when it comes to an actual revolution being repressed. Going to a protest near your politicians or calling/writing them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Its because you cant see hexbear. Definitely not silent at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Hexbear deserved to be defederated. No regrets

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Hex bear is the best part of lemmy in my experience tbh idk while y'all hate them so much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Mods openly denied the Uyghour genocide in front of everyone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    I do see doubt put on the genocide label for what's happening to the Uyghur Muslims. I also don't think that label fits.

    Maybe I'm just ignorant, it's one of those issues you don't hear much about. I saw this the other day and thought it was interesting

    https://youtu.be/wYlzjuAoaSI

    Not trying to argue with you so much as hope you got some links I can check to make sure I ain't missing big pieces.

    I know a lot of arrests were made in like 2018ish and they had camps for them but I thought they transfer people to standard jails or let them out by now tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    Be the change you want to see in the world. Post news articles, make comments, make memes about the event itself, not making lemmy users the subject of your ire, the same people you wish to convince? Not the most efficient way to start the convo

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    2500 dead, 10 000 arrested.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago

    I like how you conflate three very different groups of users together and smear half of them as something they're not.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 9 months ago

    They're not revolutionizing in the correct revolutionary way, which makes them bourgeoise agents of Western Imperialism.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago

    "ICE officers roam the streets and kill innocent civilians but 3%er, patriot front, nra and proud boys are silent"

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago (13 children)

    Yes, but you see, the US is on their side, which means they're the bad guys.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    On the one hand, sure, the people there should watch out for the possibility that the US or similar tries to get a government satisfactory to them installed if the current one falls.

    But on the other hand, it's not like there's any mechanism, in a revolution, to collectively declare "you're not allowed to support us" and have it stick. So if all it takes for a revolution to be illegitimate is the US to declare itself in favor, then the US has the power to delegitimize any revolution it wishes without recourse, which doesn't make much sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    My personal problem with this is that we're not talking about ANY country but specifically about the current US admin which has recently, shitting on all international rules, declared itself to be above international law and kidnapped an foreign leader (yes, he was dictator, but for international laws to be valuable they must treat EVERYONE equal... not only the ones deemed worthy by the biggest bully in the yard). Since this isn't the first wave of protests but the first one to, apparently, get inhumanely bloody in this magnitude one obvious key factor differing this one from the previous ones is the openly hostile and antidemocratic US admin taking power one year ago.

    Taking this factors into consideration it seems highly questionable weather these protests will lead to an overall better situation for the Iranian people... and this outcome would be the only one justifying the blood shed.

    People don't want to repeat their mistake of blindly cheering revolutions just for them to turn into even worse dictatorships afterwards... like it happened in many countries after Arabian spring. Hence the skepticism and caution in my eyes is more a sign of an ability to learn from past mistakes... especially since this time a foreign nation isn't ,,secondarily involved" but repeatedly made actual threats to destabilize the nation in question and is actively threatening with war, not for the people but to fill its own pockets and demonstrate its power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    "Opposing a dictatorship is bad if the connotations are problematic"

    Go outside

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    ,,Opposing a dictatorship is always good... even if the majority of the people there are worse off afterwards. The main thing is that I feel morally superior while risking nothing myself. "

    Read a book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    Its funny since lots of revolutions only really succeeded due to another state actor involved. Imagine being against the Haitian revolution because you think its just some psyop by the Americans to harm the French

    edit: To clarify I don't know if the Haitians NEEDED the US, but the US did help

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    The Hatian revolution didn't really succeed either. Dessalines basically just re-enslaved everyone but they all started to slowly starve because nobody would trade with them after the rampage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Speaking up is a good start. Having infinite energy for condemnation of every misstep of a bourgeois liberal regime but not a single moment for the condemnation of repression in an authoritarian theocratic regime because it's "Anti-West" is suspect.

    Luckily(/s) many of the usual suspects on here have shown that they have plenty of energy... for condemning the Iranian protests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Because their oppressors are in opposition to the United States, alot of so called revolutionaries on Lemmy have sided with the oppressors. Many Leftist on this site express more solidarity with "the enemy of my enemy" than they do with workers internationally and they'll happily abandon the Iranian people rather then risk a new Iranian government that's less hostile to the West.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure what youre looking for here, validation? Fanfare? Anger?

    Good for them. They died fighting for what they believed in and history will remember them kindly. Should we all be so lucky.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    The "Everything America supports" is bad virus, many such cases. I think Foucoult wrote a bunch of papers in support of the Iran regime when they got rid of the Western backed government (Not to say I support that government). Did not age well..

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

    Because its a Mossad/CIA operation and part of a campaign of a several decade long regime change attempt by israel.

    PS: trump is Netanyahu's bitch

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    No shit Sherlock, every revolution in history has been supported by a regime's enemies. The French supported the Americans, the Germans smuggled Lenin into Russia, Soviets supported Mao, etc etc.

    Braindead way to handwave away rape, murder, and maiming as state policy to terrorize and suppress their population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah man, it's all the Mossad, actual Iranians are totally happy and totally support their very friendly government. They are totally not writing songs about how they are going to tear government officials limb from limb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Not saying they are totally happy. But this is because of 20+ years of economic and financial sanctions by Europe and the USA for the crime of supporting Palestine.

    Sanctions have become even more extreme after Trump pulled out of JCPOA in 2018 and applied 'maximum pressure" sanctions package.

    I am impressed with how Iranians have protested en mass. It puts western so called democracies to Shame. But you have to be real that Israel doesn't care about democracy. It wants.Iran to be broken up unto a dozen statelets that it can bomb at will like Syria.

    This is scheming by the US Empire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Oh Israel does not want a free Iran. We're on the same page here. But Iranians do. And just going "tHeY'rE aLl MoSsAd AgEnTs" is fucking hilarious when you see how many of them are willing to get shot for their freedom. Surely it must all be done by Mossad agitators.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    If the US dropped sanctions then the economic situation would improve. The problem is the US is owned by Zionists and they want to destroy Iran. They're using protestors to achieve that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I'll take things that never happened for 10 bucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Tankies are gonna tankie, that's nothing new. There are plenty of leftists siding with the Iranian revolutionaries on Lemmy, so what the OP says (that leftists in general are silent on Iran) is false. Unless they're specifically talking about tankies, but nowhere do I see them making that distinction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not denying anything, except the neutrality of HRAI. It looks, in my view, as a CIA front. Also, they report 10000 detained people, but it's not like you would care about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Ah, it's "just" 2,600 human lives cut short for protesting against authoritarianism and we'll over 10,000 more imprisoned with the regime pledging to execute them. Not that you care about it as those three magic letters clearly justify anything to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (8 children)

    Almost as if the lemmites "communist, socialist, anarchist" population are fascist authoritarians hiding behind a mask, posing for online clout.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    There's not really a lot of actual socialists here. Tankies and accelerationists far as the eye can see, but surprisingly few socialists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I thought the contingency here of leftists and liberals was pretty high?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Leftists yeah, liberals it depends on the instance. The difference between those terms means a lot more here than on reddit. Plenty would argue successfully that liberals aren't left at all but then we're getting into anti capitalist theory which isn't very practical in a capitalist society. But most lemmy communists seem to be of the Soviet and Chinese variety, so you know, not really communist at all but definitely anti capitalist authoritarian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Plenty of real socialists. Just filter grad, ml, and Hexbear, and the ratio much improves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

    From what I've read it sounds like they're attempting a bourgeois revolution. Historically, it doesn't bode well for the working class there, and eventually even for the revolutionaries themselves. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.

    I don't particularly care for the Iranian government (they support Palestine and are anti-imperialist, but they have some really shitty policies at home). That said, the most likely outcome if the revolutionaries succeed is the US installing a puppet fascist government, most likely reinstating the Shah. It can get so much worse from here, just look at Syria.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

    "Some shitty policies" is an astonishing euphemism for a government just murdered 10k+ protesters and is actively using rape, murder, and maiming as weapons to terrorize its people into compliance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I agree it's fucked up what Khamenei is doing. Even before the protests the government had some awful policies when it came to human rights of the Iranian people. The protestors have every right to be angry and fuck shit up.

    But judging by their slogans, a lot of them are aligning themselves with their fundamental enemies - imperialists whose sanctions have led the country to its current economic state.

    Unless a revolution is staunchly anti-imperialist, it is bound to be co-opted by the US to set up a puppet government and extract as much labor & resources as they can muster, by any means necessary. Remember that the last time the Shah came to power, the protests were founded in real issues and grievances of the population, and look at the outcome. Look at the outcome for Syria or almost any Arab Spring country. I guess for many Iranians getting US to support them seems like the only way to win, in which case it's a real catch-22. Maybe it will turn out that this iteration of the monarchist government will be slightly better than the clerical one, but looking at the state of US right now it's unlikely.

    I am heartbroken about this whole thing, because those people are clearly fighting for a better future for themselves, and they're getting slaughtered for it. But it is likely that their sacrifice will be for nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The current regime has been enforcing a gender apartheid system for over 45 years. I reserve the same hatred for these fuckers like I do for Netanyahu and Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeah, but the monarchist protestors want to reinstate the US-backed Pahlavi dynasty in the form of Reza Pahlavi.

    His father Mohammad, the last US-installed Shah of Iran has literally said this in an interview:

    Women are wicked, evil, all of them ... Women haven’t produced anything, no scientists, they’re pretty creatures

    And has repeatedly referred to women as sexual objects existing only for his gratification.

    Reza himself has been quiet on women's rights, never once denouncing either his father's views or the currently existing gender inequality in Iran.

    I guess it wasn't very socially acceptable to be that misogynistic in the US after the 70s or so. Maybe he will finally speak out now that Trump made this kind of discourse mainstream again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    I feel really icky defending a prince, but Reza Kiri has, on multiple occasions, denounced the gender apartheid in Iran.

    His father being misogynistic, like any patriarch, does not negate the fact that women are de facto second class citizens in Iran. Their testimony in court is worth less than that of a man, their right to divorce is severely limited and let's not forget how Mahsa Amini got beaten to death for not wearing her hijab correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Most of you here are against personal firearm ownership, make fun of the constant US school shootings, yet expect revolutions to be won against the State with only rocks and cleverly written signs.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    I'm confused, are you saying that constant school shootings are a necessary evil? Don't you think think personal firearm ownership is possible without schools getting shot up constantly? Apologies if I misconstrued your point but that's what I understood

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    That looks like being in denial about Republican complicity much more than being an apologist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Actually can you explain what you meant here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Many conservatives with a poor knowledge of history and/or poor political education and/or poor pattern recognition struggle to accept that their party is a currently fascist. They often view Fascist/Nazi as an insult rather than a descriptive term with definitions. They are complicit in fascism because their actions help support it but since they're convinced they are not Nazis they make no apologies for Nazis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    So when are you flying to iran and joining the protests?

  • source
  • [+] -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)