Don't have to wear a condom if you don't have sex 😎
post
Vascectomy for the win.
The amount of guys I've met in my whole life who outright refused to wear a condom was... One. Singular.
Called him an idiot. Then he ended up catching an STD. His dick burned for two weeks and I couldn't stop smiling.
Anyway, this seems to be another one of those comics that tries present abnormal behaviour as a common thing.
Yep. Plenty of women out there that insist on having sex without condom as well.
Depends on where you live/your cultural context. The number of times I’ve heard from women in recent years that men refuse to wear condoms has been truly surprising.
Not only that, but the fact is, the vast majority of the time a Bad Thing (e.g. STI transmission or unwanted pregnancy) happens from unprotected sex, it's because both partners simply didn't care enough to use anything. Even taking the idiot in your example, he got laid in the end, that's how he got what he got.
Without these idiots of both sexes, unwanted pregnancy would be extremely rare, and almost no STI would survive longer than a generation.
Guys saying condoms are uncomfortable don't know how to properly put them on, and/or use the incorrect size for their dick.
I've tried several brands and sizes and the right condom makes a big difference.
This was me for a good three years. Standard condoms were always uncomfortable, to the point of pain, but not once did I consider going larger, thanks to my first girlfriend (our breakup was... less than ideal thanks to her cheating, and she then went on to tell me, and most of our friends, that my size was entirely inadequate, borderline micropenis, which I took to heart for quite a while).
It took the aforementioned three years and quite a few one-night stands telling me I'm big to even start thinking "hey maybe I need larger condoms".
Guys, don't be like me, if it's uncomfortable, go check out the many brands that do specifically sized nominal widths for condoms. Each will have a guide on successfully measuring yourself, or offer a sample kit which you can try for the right fit. Don't ruin your sex life with shitty condom choices.
I always bought regular size but then I sent my gf to buy and she took the larger ones. Not that we have sex like ever but when we do, there is a big difference now. Doesn't hurt and I don't get off in 2 seconds 😂
what about guys with weird shaped penis's?
are there churo or star shaped condoms?
I liked playdoh as a kid and got curious about the extrusion set one day....
edit: wow, touchy subject! who knew men were so insecure about their penises and feel personally attacked when a dick joke is made!

Put a regular condom on one and find out. Condoms stretch and conform, so all your question shows is that you've never used one. Its amazing how eager circumcised virgins are to out themselves over this stuff.
churo
So ribbed (lengthwise) for her pleasure?
It's not always simple, if Durex XXL and Magnum XL sit tight, check out the Condomeria in Amsterdam, they have a "numbers" line, like 64 for example and they ship worldwide!
Life saver.
There are multiple birth control methods to choose from. Planned Parenthood has a great guide.
Am I the only person who is more deathly afraid of a life long STD that could fucking kill me than an unplanned pregnancy?
I dont care which one of us got the snip, unless I'm sure I'm the only dude you're banging I'm bagging the fuck up until I see some test results which I'll be happy to get and provide in kind.
I'd assume because many people in these discussions are married... in which case yeah getting an STD would be the booger on top of the shit sundae. But yeah the test results only have to be checked overall at the start of the long term relationship... at least assuming you can trust your partner... while pregnancy is something you've got to be alert to in the entirety of a relationship.
Get the 3 HPV vaccines, the 3 Hep A/B vaccines, and start truvada (or the dirt cheap generic brands).
And learn about the signs of syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea. And just get anti-biotics if you catch them.
And learn to watch out for Herpes sores in a partner. (Not deadly but obviously you don't want Herpes)
EDIT: Oh and get regular testing obviously. Asking your partners to do the same on the regular is a lot easier if you're doing so.
There, you've mitigated like 99% of the threat. You could be an absolute horndog or slut rawdogging all the time and you're more likely to die in a car accident than because of an STI in the US at least.
I really can't think of an STI that would kill you these days. Am I missing one?
Yay condoms!
In a first world country with access to excellent medical care, no underlying conditions in an otherwise healthy person you're probably going to be fine.
Thats not to say it might not be a significant contributor to what does get you.
What might be a significant contributor to what gets you? Like what STI(s) are you thinking about?
Honestly why I downvoted OP. They shouldn't be at the point of having this pissing-match without having used condoms together already, and cumming-inside the vagina isn't exactly required for intimacy even then.
OPs characters lack imagination, and are catering to an audience that shouldn't be encouraged into maintaining such a narrow way of thought.
a life long STD that could fucking kill me than an unplanned pregnancy?
To be fair, a pregnancy can kill you, too.
Yeah, bi man here, I can't get pregnant, but STDs still would affect me if I had sex with men.
As opposed to the very safe and not fatal action of pregnancy and giving birth?
I read it more as they're open to having kids but not open to having an STD, which honestly is a pretty sane headspace to be in
Yeah, but (if I'm reading correctly) upstream commenter has a pp and doesn't have to worry about the physical dangers of pregnancy/birth.
I had trouble till (hormonal) IUD, would never discount the side effects of most birth control available to women - copper IUD nearly killed me with hemorrhage, and pills raised my blood pressure, anything that went inside me (diaphragm, etc) either gave me yeast infection or bladder infection, so many of the methods seem designed to punish women for wanting sex without pregnancy.
But I'd think guys would love condoms because it's the only reversible birth control they can control themselves.
Condoms can reduce sensitivity, but I don't understand the hate. Is sex for some people some kind of race to see who can cum first? Try taking your time and enjoy it.
If you can't cum with a condom on, maybe the problem isn't the condom? Get your blood pressure checked. One of the first things I noticed when I started having issue with high blood pressure, was that the extra BP created a bit of extra "hardness", but also reduced my sensitivity.
But I’d think guys would love condoms because it’s the only reversible birth control they can control themselves.
Yeah, what's with that? Why are there dozens of different birth control options for women, and men have exactly condoms, permanent sterilization and nothing else?
You'd think there would be some kind of decent male birth control by now. It's been 65 years since the first hormonal birth control for women was released. It's been more than enough time to get something decent done for men too.
Why are there dozens of different birth control options for women, and men have exactly condoms, permanent sterilization and nothing else?
Because only the female body has a built-in 'fertility off' mode (pregnancy) that pharmacopoeia can manipulate. The most effective contraceptive methods we have all depend on tricking the female body into thinking it's pregnant when it isn't. The reason women have so many options is simply because there are a lot of different ways to accomplish that 'trickery', pharmaceutically. Women also only have one real barrier method, the diaphragm. It's even shittier than condoms, re efficacy.
Those are just the biological facts of the matter. It's not some sinister scheme to pass the buck from men to women. The above is exacerbated by the simple fact that it's about stopping one egg a month versus stopping millions of constantly-created sperm.
There's been various methods for blocking sperm from travelling down the vas deferens that managed to get through studies and then just got dropped.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vas-occlusive_contraception
Edit: This is what Wikipedia has to say on that topic:
Despite this, pharmaceutical companies are reluctant to lose market share of a thriving global market for female contraceptives and condoms which bring billions of dollars of revenue each year. Initially, RISUG attracted some interest from pharmaceutical companies. However, considering that RISUG is an inexpensive, one-time procedure, manufacturers retracted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance
That kind of procedure would wipe out most of the contraceptive industry. And of course that can't be allowed.
so many of the methods seem designed to punish women for wanting sex without pregnancy.
Yes, that's right, the people inventing these contraceptives were all huddled in a room twirling their misogyny mustaches, discussing "okay, we're going to make this thing that prevents pregnancy, but we have to MAKE SURE it has unpleasant side effects, these women must be punished!"
Please.
But I’d think guys would love condoms because it’s the only reversible birth control they can control themselves.
Guys do like that, but not as much as they dislike the fact that it makes sex a lot less pleasurable, which is the primary reason they want to have sex in the first place. That's why a lot of guys, like me, would rather just not have sex with a woman, if the only 'safe' (re both STIs and pregnancy) way to have sex with her, is with a condom on.
Broadly speaking I agree since entitled guys certainly exist but also I've heard some women describe condom sex as feeling like getting fucked with a sandwich baggie and not their favorite
"feels like I'm being fucked by a rubber duck" are words from my now wife that I won't ever forget.
Neither sex prefers condoms to no condoms. No pair of sexual partners ever utilize them unless they have a good reason to (and even with a good reason, many people don't, lol).
Neither sex prefers condoms to no condoms.
I can't speak for everyone in my gender, but I've rarely found an issue with them. Desensitizes the man so he lasts longer, comes pre-lubricated so that's one less thing to worry about, and neatly addresses the post-sex mess. There's even a little fun foreplay right before the main event, if you're feeling kinky.
No pair of sexual partners ever utilize them unless they have a good reason to (and even with a good reason, most people don’t, lol).
Especially early in a relationship, they were always bog standard for me. Rarely met a partner who didn't feel the same way. Admittedly, the AIDS epidemic was in my rear view mirror growing up, so maybe I'm just more paranoid about unprotected sex than the Zoomers.
I can’t speak for everyone in my gender, but I’ve rarely found an issue with them.
Not what I said, though. Do you prefer sex with a condom to sex without? If not, you align with what I said.
Especially early in a relationship, they were always bog standard for me.
That's obviously in the "good reason" category. Also agrees with the other part of my sentence, as tons of short-sighted people forgo them altogether, including one-night stands with strangers.
Do you prefer sex with a condom to sex without?
I don't have a strong opinion either way. I like sex and I like a sense of safety. With new partners, or old partners who fear a risk of pregnancy, condoms guarantee both and that makes me feel good coming and going.
I don't prefer unprotected sex when it leaves me paranoid the day after. There's more to the experience than just degrees of friction.
You're missing my point, which I thought was clear, but add "when the condom is not preventing anything" to the end of the bit you quoted to clarify it.
My point is that, unless you have a good reason to do it (the source of the "sense of safety" and the prevention of the "paranoia", described above), you're obviously not going to do it.
If your partner is infertile, and you know that both of you have no STIs, neither of you are going to want to use a condom. Condoms are used because they're needed, not because they're wanted.
but add “when the condom is not preventing anything”
"Would you wear a seatbelt if you knew you weren't going to crash?"
I don't know that. I don't know the condom isn't preventing anything. That's the whole point. It's a precautionary measure that let's me enjoy sex without worrying about the consequences.
If your partner is infertile, and you know that both of you have no STIs, neither of you are going to want to use a condom.
Okay but what happens if you're having sex under the age of 50?
“Would you wear a seatbelt if you knew you weren’t going to crash?”
I don’t know that. I don’t know the condom isn’t preventing anything.
Dude...It's a hypothetical...the "whole point" is that people only use condoms (and seat belts) because they do something that the user needs done. That's why people wear seat belts in their car, but not on their couch at home.
No one actually enjoys using condoms, and as soon as their functionality (contraception and/or STI prevention) isn't needed, they're ditched immediately. Just like how people don't put on a seat belt when they're getting into their car to sit stationary in their driveway and listen to music or something.
My birth control is my face. Been working great.
If your oral contraceptives cause you any significant side effects, it makes sense to consult a gynecologist to change the prescription. There are many options out there, and correctly chosen ones should not typically cause them.
In terms of pregnancies, oral contraceptives can be both more or less efficient that condoms depending on the mode of usage for each (and also discipline, don't skip either). Besides, for many couples accidental pregnancy is a bit of a change of plans, but not something that will warrant abortion or make children unwanted. Again, case-dependent.
It's okay to choose condoms as well, as long as partners are happy about it. If that gives you a peace of mind, you can even combine both measures at the same time! It's only important to remember that there are two (or more) partners involved, and all being happy about the choices made is crucial for great intimacy. Do not ever force someone to take pills if they don't want to, and discuss your options if someone has issues with condoms. Maybe the issues are with latex condoms specifically, with polyurethane options providing less allergenicity and better sensitivity. Maybe a diaphragm can be your option. Or maybe something else. You can always discuss, you're not on a gender war or something, you're partners.
Personally, I can't wait for male contraceptive pills to hit the market. Not only it will provide a solution to this specific problem, shifting responsibility for proper selection of contraception and any issues coming with it onto the people who need it the most, it will also provide men with more agency about their reproduction. Finally, you can combine male and female contraceptives to get unparalleled non-barrier protection with good insurance in case one partner misses the pill. Win all-round.
On another personal note, sexual discomfort is obviously an important factor to account for when talking about intimacy and love, so it shouldn't be seen as stupid and unimportant, as portrayed here.
That should not overpower any health concerns, not least because they are too sources of discomfort, but it should be taken into account.
Talk it through with your partner - you're in it together, and there's almost certainly an option for both of you. Feel free to explore something other than pills and condoms as well if you need it - the world of contraception methods is huge.
If oral contraceptives have too many side effects, just don't have oral sex. Easy.
This is why your headache didn't go away. It is actually pronounced 'analgesic', not 'ANALgesic'. The pills go into your mouth.

I have used up all my friday and saturday pills, what to do, only have sex on mondays now?
Yeah but then the person can't make a comic to shit on men.
I'm so very tired of these pointless gender wars, honestly.
There are better and more productive ways to voice general concerns - there truly exists a pressure on some women to use hormonal contraception, and this is bad - it's not okay to pressure your partner in matters of health and intimacy. But what helps is getting to the root of the problem.
The root is sexual discomfort on one side and anxiety on the other standing in the way of intimacy. So, maybe there are other unexplored options to resolve this conflict in a way that is comfortable to all sides? The world of contraception is very rich, and tries to cater to everyone's use cases.
IUD's can be great too. My wife has used them for years. Reduced period frequency and severity, higher effective rate of contraception, no need to worry about taking a pill late or missing one. Her gynecologist said it will probably reduce pre-menopausal symptoms too when she gets older. And it's pretty easily removable.
There was a couple of weeks when she was sore from the initial placement, and the same whenever it gets changed. They keep on getting approved to last longer and longer- the most recent one was good for 8 years, but there's a good chance it will get extended before it needs to be replaced as more research is done.
Not for everyone, but great for a lot of people.
Absolutely! Know a few folks who use IUD's, and heard mostly positive feedback.
I saw one in an efficacy chart for different contraceptives that IUDs were slightly better than tubal ligation (literal sterilization)! Given the side effects etc. of the latter, it seems like 'getting your tubes tied' has become completely obsoleted by modern IUDs.
To be fair, this is likely about hormonal options, which is the primary reason people might be concerned about oral contraception mentioned in the post.
Regular copper IUDs have their track record a bit worse, but still going very strong.
Also, using IUDs ideally requires checking if the device is still set right after each period - not doing so may increase one's chances of getting pregnant.
We both like actually touching each-other instead of latex
I prefer to be on the pill, honestly. I get that it isn't the sane experience fir everyone, but there are multiple other options other than the two mentioned. Even when it comes to pills, there is also the mini pill which has no estrogen and therefore can help with some of the negative symptoms. I started taking that one because I had a few negative reactions to regular birth control pills.
With the mini pill you have to be pretty precise with the time of day where you take it but once you have that down, it's just so pleasant. In my case, it entirely stops menstruation and stabilizes me. I get to live a very normal life without all this cycle shit disrupting me.
I get that not all women feel about their periods like I do, but for me, it has always felt like an assault on my body that I have to be in pain, have crazy mood swings and feeling gross every single month. I don't have any of it anymore thanks to the mini pill.
Again, there are many more options to go for when it comes to birth control, other than pills and condoms and in general I don't want us to demonize it. Especially not in these times where there is a genuine push in American politics to spread anti-birthcontrol propaganda online.

top 95 comments