The killing of Renee Good by a federal immigration officer in Minneapolis this week came as Republicans in Congress were planning to bring a homeland security spending bill to the House floor, deciding on whether the agency that's surged thousands of armed agents into communities across the country should have increased funding—and progressive lawmakers are demanding that the Democrats use the upcoming government funding deadline to hopefully reduce the department's ability to wreak further havoc.

"I just don’t understand how we provide votes for a bill that funds the extent of the depravity," Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told CNN Thursday. "I know we can’t fix everything in the appropriations bill but we should be looking at ways we can put some commonsense limitations on their ability to bring violence to our cities."

But the top Democratic leaders, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY) both appeared to have little interest in discussing how their party can use the appropriations process as leverage to rein in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agencies that have taken part in President Donald Trump's mass deportation operation.

Both Schumer and Jeffries sharply criticized Wednesday's shooting and the Trump administration's insistence that, contrary to mounting video evidence, the ICE agent who shot Good was acting in self-defense.

But Jeffries said Thursday that he was focused on passing other appropriations bills that were ultimately approved by the House.

“We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time," Jeffries told reporters.

— (@)

With Congress facing a January 30 deadline for approving government spending packages—and with public disapproval of ICE at an all-time high—several lawmakers have said this week that right now is the "appropriate time" to rein in the agency in any way the Democrats can.

"Statements and letters are not enough, and the appropriations process and the [continuing resolution] expiring January 31 is our opportunity," Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) told Axios.

Schumer also refused to say whether the Democrats would use the appropriations process as leverage to cut funding to ICE, whose budget is set to balloon to $170 billion following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year. Republicans will need Democratic support to pass a spending bill in the Senate, where 60 votes are required.

— (@)

The Senate leader said only that he has "lots of problems with ICE" when asked whether he would support abolishing the agency—a proposal whose support has gone by 20 percentage points among voters in just one year, according to a recent survey. Both leaders also would not commit to slashing the homeland security budget should the Democrats win back majorities in Congress this year.

"It’s hard to be an opposition party when you refuse to oppose the blatantly illegal and immoral things being done by the opposition," said Melanie D'Arrigo, executive director of the Campaign for New York Health.

Sharing a clip of Jeffries' remarks to reporters about the agency's funding, historian Moshik Temkin said that "people need to understand that at its core ICE is a bipartisan project, increasingly funded and normalized over multiple Democratic administrations and congressional majorities, and a few of them (not this guy) are starting to realize how foolish, weak, and misguided they were."

Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) are among the progressive lawmakers calling on the Democrats to demand reduced funding for ICE—even if it means another government shutdown months after the longest one in US history late last year, which began when the Democrats refused to join the GOP in passing a spending bill that would have allowed Affordable Care Act tax credits to expire. Ultimately, some Senate Democrats caved, and the subsidies lapsed.

"We can't just keep authorizing money for these illegal killers," Jayapal told Axios. "That's what they are, this rogue force."

Ocasio-Cortez told the Independent that Democrats should "absolutely" push to cut funding.

“This Congress, this Republican Congress, while they cut a trillion dollars to Americans’ healthcare, and they exploded the ICE budget to $170 billion making it one of the largest paramilitary forces in the United States with zero accountability as they shoot US citizens in the head—absolutely,” she said.

On the podcast The Majority Report, Emma Vigeland and Sam Seder called on progressive Democrats to demand Schumer's ouster in light of his refusal to take action to rein in ICE as its violence in American communities escalates.

It's time for Democrats to oust Chuck Schumer from leadership pic.twitter.com/ByWMJ495zb
— Majority Report (@majorityfm) January 9, 2026

"Change the news cycle and show that you'll be an opposition party," said Vigeland. "Call for his ouster."

Seder added that Schumer "has the ability to wage a fight to prevent the funding of DHS. He has the ability to do that and he doesn't want it. He's running away from any leverage he has, deliberately."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 10 months ago

I am so fucking sick of Schummer. Useless piece of shit.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    They're doing everything they possibly can to prevent the Democrats from taking power.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    “We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time," Jeffries told reporters.

    We'll do nothing right now while it's urgent and relevant and could help prevent more murders, and maybe we'll do something later (but don't check our track record on that) at some mysteriously more appropriate time (though we can't divulge when that might be). In the meantime, comply with their demands, send donations, and don't call us back.

    Now that's how you beat fascism!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    They take cues from the voters who thought sitting out an election where one party is the literal devil himself was 'showing their party how its done'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    The only opposition they represent is being opposed to the peoples will and desires. They are fascists defending fascism. They always have been.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    “We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time," Jeffries told reporters.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    People love to say Kamala wouldn't have done most of what Trump's done on immigration. While obviously she would have been less crass about it, I could absolutely see her tripling ICE's budget, simply for not wanting to seem soft on illegal immigration. It's not like Kamala or Biden are out there now calling for ICE to have its funding slashed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 73 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 91 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    “We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

    Bruh how is it not here and now? If not now, when? if not you, who?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 141 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Spineless punk ass bitches.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 49 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago* (9 children)

    Seriously this is an unbelievably dumb fucking move. They cannot be this fucking dumb.

    More and more I wonder who it is that actually calls the shots for these Democrats? Who is that gives them their orders. Obviously it's corporate donors just like it is with Republicans, but who are they?

    Did they really let Venezuela happen because they didn't want to look weak, or do they share the same incentives as Republicans courtesy of the oil industry?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago* (8 children)

    Schumer, at least, has proven himself to be a person who will claim one position in public while encouraging others to do the opposite, which is his real position. He'll take a stand for the right thing only when he knows he has enough people doing the wrong thing that he will be defeated, and then he'll publicly shrug and regret that there was nothing more he could do. He's dishonest and cowardly and does not serve the voters.

    Jeffries is just an insubstantial man who blows in the corporate wind. And also just blows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    Then you have people like Ro Kahnna making a very public display of allegedly fighting for equality and justice while Peter Thiel pulls his fucking strings from backstage. Calling for the U.S. to recognize Palestine as an independent state while downplaying his own investments in Palantir and history with other silicon valley billionaires like David Sackler.

    It just makes me wonder how many billionaires are actually funding both sides and directing Democrats to play off of each other in this never ending one step forward and two steps back bullshit of calling for the right thing as a publicity stunt, only because they know it will go nowhere and be blocked by a simultaneous counter measure they're running at the same time..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Primary them in a few months. Then, we build an actual party and hopefully redo this whole fucker because this hasn't been working for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Primary them in a few months.

    This is contingent on democrats running honest primaries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Not if it's overwhelming. Unless they pull the Biden/harris shit again, then yeah. But that would surprise me. If they do that, we can move straight to burn this mother fucker down so no one can have it mode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Collecting politicians is the new hobby among billionaires. Anyone can buy a car, yacht, even a rocketship, but to actually own and control a politician? That's valuable.

    Theil is putting together a nice collection, starting with Vance. Musk had Trump in his collection for a while, but Trump likes to remain a free agent. He's in the unique position to be able to collect Billionaires instead.

    And we're just down here, standing in the rain. That is rain, isn't it? They wouldn't actually be pissing on us, would they?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Well if nothing trickled down they would look like a bunch of liars and con artists... So if anyone asks, yes it's rain.

    Also, Thiel and Trump have been lovey dovey since his first term, he was just smart enough to keep fairly quiet about it. I suspect he actually brought Musk (and all the other tech bros) into the throuple to be the scapegoats for everything he's been planning for over a decade at this point.

    Theil actually pitched deregulating the FDA to Trump, long before Trump decided to partner with RFK Jr. Theil also helped select several of Trump's cabinet members, including Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) member, Michael Kratsios.

    Further, Kratsios served as CTO under Trump, while some very questionable policy decisions regarding technology were made. However, neither the previous jokes regarding his lack of science experience nor his role in miserably failed COVID related tech policies (see example at the end of this post), were ever mentioned by the press when Trump picked Kratsios to serve as his official science advisor for his second term.

    I wrote that in March of 2025, but in hindsight, I've started to suspect that what I always assumed were "failed" COVID tech policies, were most likely just a preview of what we're seeing in Trump's second term as he pretty openly attacks and destroys democracy and the United States. Policies hidden behind bold faced lies that were always intended to fail in order to accomplish the exact opposite of what the administration claims they are doing.

    ... while Trump has asked Kratsios to utilize AI technology to blaze a trail for American dominance in 2025, it may also be worth noting that just over 5 years ago, in March of 2020, Kratsios was also tasked by Trump to use cutting edge technology to tackle COVID misinformation and track early cases of the virus in the U.S. in order to keep it from spreading.

    March2020: The White House on Wednesday asked the tech industry’s top players to help the government in the fight against coronavirus, tapping the expertise of companies like Apple, Facebook and Amazon to help beat back falsehoods and use artificial intelligence to glean new insights into the fast-spreading virus.

    There's obviously no way to prove this, but I honestly believe the true goal was probably always to spread COVID misinformation online, especially information regarding masking during the earliest days of the pandemic.

    Why would the tech side of the Trump administration care about keeping people from masking? My guess is because the beginning of the pandemic also happened to coincide with the earliest stages of Thiel et al. rolling out Clearview AI's facial recognition technology and collecting surveillance data.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If they were controlled opposition what would they be doing different right now?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Fine, fuck it, rope for them too, hang out like Mussolini did.

    Fuck these goddamn traitors.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 10 months ago* (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I am obligated every time someone brings up Mussolini to remind everyone that Mussolini was not overthrown and executed by a plucky band of rebels....

    Sadly no, but there's always the Gaddafi treatment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Schuemer and Jeffries are not just useless, they are intentionally useless fuckwits. As with Johnson, they must be removed from office.

    Donorcrats and Turdpublicans alike are traitors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    Whenever I see these two in a picture in my feed I know some pusillanimous bullshit is going down in the Democratic Party without even reading the headline or article

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 10 months ago

    Not a time for a change in leadership but a time to obtain some leadership. Any leadership at all. Sometimes that means at least saying "Fuck You" to the people running this new system of government.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago

    They dont give a fuck about the average citizen. These are the same people that voted to slash funding Medicaid just a couple months ago. These are the same people that voted against impeaching Trump a couple months before that. These people want Republicans to pass every shithole bill they can because it's better for their bank account in the long run and the typical rube will blame the Republicans for it happening.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago

    Schumner, Jeffries unable to speak coherently with all the donor dick in their mouth.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Tf is wrong with these dipshits

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    Anyone who doesn’t stand on the right side of this issue need to be thrown out regardless of their political views.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    These two croaking would probably do more for the world than Trump. They're incompetent at best and traitors at worst.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago

    The Controlled Opposition Party at it again. Showing the world they won't do a damn thing to actually make things better. These corporate and AIPAC sponsored Dems need to go.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago

    “We’ll figure out the accountability mechanisms at the appropriate time,” Jeffries told reporters.

    Uhh….

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago

    Go ahead and call them complicit. This probably what they mean when they say they are 'playing the long game'. Idiots.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    IF Dems ever take power again, the first thing they have to do is get rid of these treasonous DINOMAGAs. They are 50% of the reason that MAGA regained power. There is no way the virtuosically incompetent MAGAs should have survived the Biden Administration, they are far too stupid, but they had plenty of help, support, and cover by these two cowardly, insipid little bitches.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    To the surprise of absolutely no one.

    Incrementalist centrism is woefully inadequate to stop fascism, even if its practitioners were interested at all in doing so.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It's almost like we've been right this entire time, weird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    It's not like centrists actually believe in incrementalism anyway. They didn't incrementally work towards helping netanyahu commit genocide. They can get out of their own way when it's the only thing any centrist has ever wanted or will ever want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 10 months ago

    There's the Democrats I know

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    Important to remember that Jeffries has ties to the Kushner family. Also Chuck Schumer is in love with and subservient to his imaginary Republican friends.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    If they were compost, at least they would be providing value for the planet.

    Just food for thought.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Schumer is a republican politician, of course he won't join Democrats

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    Schumer is the new McConnell. Determined to wreck the efficacy of the Democrats.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Ineffective and out of touch leadership needs to step aside. AOC really ought to primary Schumer in 2028, but Democrats need different congressional leadership way before then. And Jeffries is so robotic to me. He never has the backbone when it's needed, just like Schumer

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Of course. The Dems' donors won't allow any real opposition to fascism.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Man, I mean what will the Baileys say of this?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    Fuck Schumer, Pelosi and all the old ass Democrats.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    The largest blame belongs on the GOP, but let's be clear... Competent democratic leadership could have prevented all of this.

    These crooked, shit ass democrats like Schumer, Jeffries, Pelosi - even RGB - are soaked at this point in the blood and despair of the American people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    RGB cold in her grave is to blame for our troubles now? Fucks sake if it weren't for her we would be miles worse. Stop taking one persons missteps and snowballing it into apocalypse. There are so many active agents of chaos already alive and well.

    Seriously, a random time traveler stepping on a butterfly and consiquently the dinosaurs still existing make more sense that that garbage. You have the benefit of hindsight. Just like alcohol and weed, please use it responsibly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    He’ll write them a strongly worded letter, at least.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago

    The spineless shitlib corrupt politicians have once again shown their loyalty and its to the capitalist class. Once again those who seek to reform the system are consistently proven little more than controlled opposition.

    This is why we must abolish capitalism in its entirety, there is no room to compromise with reactionary filth.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago*

    They’ll be enabling mass graves. They’re not on our side

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    We need leaders that want to try new things and aren't afraid to fight back. This is not normal and if they are afraid then they need to step aside and let others lead.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago

    Both parties are literally owned by the Israeli,s and the same Zionist oligarchs. Until we fix this fact nothing will change

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I recognize that the knee-jerk reaction to end ICE is probably not the best solution.

    But, read the room. Your constituents are begging you for strong leadership actions.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why? What has ice done for anyone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Fire those sunza bitches!

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/libjerk@anarchist.nexus view that post
    [–] [S] 7 points 10 months ago

    Is it time for a change in leadership to hold ICE accountable?

    Yes, it is!

    Will it happen?

    No, it won't!

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/lefty_news@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Those two provide a lot of the answer to the question "Why do people hate the Democratic party so much that they find voting for a convicted felon pedo fascist preferable ".

  • source